Cargando…

Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery

AIMS: To compare the retinal sensitivity and frequency of microscotomas found by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) combined with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry after idiopathic macular hole closure, in eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tadayoni, Ramin, Svorenova, Ivana, Erginay, Ali, Gaudric, Alain, Massin, Pascale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23077227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302035
_version_ 1782251712686325760
author Tadayoni, Ramin
Svorenova, Ivana
Erginay, Ali
Gaudric, Alain
Massin, Pascale
author_facet Tadayoni, Ramin
Svorenova, Ivana
Erginay, Ali
Gaudric, Alain
Massin, Pascale
author_sort Tadayoni, Ramin
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare the retinal sensitivity and frequency of microscotomas found by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) combined with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry after idiopathic macular hole closure, in eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and eyes that did not. METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-randomised, comparative study. Combined SD-OCT and SLO microperimetry was performed in 16 consecutive eyes after closure of an idiopathic macular hole. A customised microperimetry pattern with 29 measurement points was used. The ILM was peeled in 8/16 eyes. The main outcome measure was mean retinal sensitivity. RESULTS: Mean retinal sensitivity (in dB) was lower after peeling: 9.80±2.35 dB with peeling versus 13.19±2.92 without (p=0.0209). Postoperative microscotomas were significantly more frequent after ILM peeling: 11.3±6.6 points with retinal sensitivity below 10 dB in eyes that underwent peeling versus 2.9±4.6 in those that did not (p=0.0093). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ILM peeling may reduce retinal sensitivity, and significantly increase the incidence of microscotomas. Until a prospective trial confirming or not these results, it seems justified to avoid peeling the ILM when its potential benefit seems minor or unproved, and when peeling is carried out, to limit the surface peeled to the bare minimum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3512349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35123492012-12-14 Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery Tadayoni, Ramin Svorenova, Ivana Erginay, Ali Gaudric, Alain Massin, Pascale Br J Ophthalmol Original Articles AIMS: To compare the retinal sensitivity and frequency of microscotomas found by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) combined with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry after idiopathic macular hole closure, in eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and eyes that did not. METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-randomised, comparative study. Combined SD-OCT and SLO microperimetry was performed in 16 consecutive eyes after closure of an idiopathic macular hole. A customised microperimetry pattern with 29 measurement points was used. The ILM was peeled in 8/16 eyes. The main outcome measure was mean retinal sensitivity. RESULTS: Mean retinal sensitivity (in dB) was lower after peeling: 9.80±2.35 dB with peeling versus 13.19±2.92 without (p=0.0209). Postoperative microscotomas were significantly more frequent after ILM peeling: 11.3±6.6 points with retinal sensitivity below 10 dB in eyes that underwent peeling versus 2.9±4.6 in those that did not (p=0.0093). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ILM peeling may reduce retinal sensitivity, and significantly increase the incidence of microscotomas. Until a prospective trial confirming or not these results, it seems justified to avoid peeling the ILM when its potential benefit seems minor or unproved, and when peeling is carried out, to limit the surface peeled to the bare minimum. BMJ Publishing Group 2012-12 2012-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3512349/ /pubmed/23077227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302035 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tadayoni, Ramin
Svorenova, Ivana
Erginay, Ali
Gaudric, Alain
Massin, Pascale
Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery
title Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery
title_full Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery
title_fullStr Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery
title_full_unstemmed Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery
title_short Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery
title_sort decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23077227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302035
work_keys_str_mv AT tadayoniramin decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery
AT svorenovaivana decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery
AT erginayali decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery
AT gaudricalain decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery
AT massinpascale decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery