Cargando…
Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery
AIMS: To compare the retinal sensitivity and frequency of microscotomas found by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) combined with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry after idiopathic macular hole closure, in eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeli...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23077227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302035 |
_version_ | 1782251712686325760 |
---|---|
author | Tadayoni, Ramin Svorenova, Ivana Erginay, Ali Gaudric, Alain Massin, Pascale |
author_facet | Tadayoni, Ramin Svorenova, Ivana Erginay, Ali Gaudric, Alain Massin, Pascale |
author_sort | Tadayoni, Ramin |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To compare the retinal sensitivity and frequency of microscotomas found by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) combined with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry after idiopathic macular hole closure, in eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and eyes that did not. METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-randomised, comparative study. Combined SD-OCT and SLO microperimetry was performed in 16 consecutive eyes after closure of an idiopathic macular hole. A customised microperimetry pattern with 29 measurement points was used. The ILM was peeled in 8/16 eyes. The main outcome measure was mean retinal sensitivity. RESULTS: Mean retinal sensitivity (in dB) was lower after peeling: 9.80±2.35 dB with peeling versus 13.19±2.92 without (p=0.0209). Postoperative microscotomas were significantly more frequent after ILM peeling: 11.3±6.6 points with retinal sensitivity below 10 dB in eyes that underwent peeling versus 2.9±4.6 in those that did not (p=0.0093). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ILM peeling may reduce retinal sensitivity, and significantly increase the incidence of microscotomas. Until a prospective trial confirming or not these results, it seems justified to avoid peeling the ILM when its potential benefit seems minor or unproved, and when peeling is carried out, to limit the surface peeled to the bare minimum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3512349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35123492012-12-14 Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery Tadayoni, Ramin Svorenova, Ivana Erginay, Ali Gaudric, Alain Massin, Pascale Br J Ophthalmol Original Articles AIMS: To compare the retinal sensitivity and frequency of microscotomas found by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) combined with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry after idiopathic macular hole closure, in eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and eyes that did not. METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-randomised, comparative study. Combined SD-OCT and SLO microperimetry was performed in 16 consecutive eyes after closure of an idiopathic macular hole. A customised microperimetry pattern with 29 measurement points was used. The ILM was peeled in 8/16 eyes. The main outcome measure was mean retinal sensitivity. RESULTS: Mean retinal sensitivity (in dB) was lower after peeling: 9.80±2.35 dB with peeling versus 13.19±2.92 without (p=0.0209). Postoperative microscotomas were significantly more frequent after ILM peeling: 11.3±6.6 points with retinal sensitivity below 10 dB in eyes that underwent peeling versus 2.9±4.6 in those that did not (p=0.0093). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ILM peeling may reduce retinal sensitivity, and significantly increase the incidence of microscotomas. Until a prospective trial confirming or not these results, it seems justified to avoid peeling the ILM when its potential benefit seems minor or unproved, and when peeling is carried out, to limit the surface peeled to the bare minimum. BMJ Publishing Group 2012-12 2012-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3512349/ /pubmed/23077227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302035 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tadayoni, Ramin Svorenova, Ivana Erginay, Ali Gaudric, Alain Massin, Pascale Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery |
title | Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery |
title_full | Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery |
title_fullStr | Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery |
title_short | Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery |
title_sort | decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23077227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tadayoniramin decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery AT svorenovaivana decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery AT erginayali decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery AT gaudricalain decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery AT massinpascale decreasedretinalsensitivityafterinternallimitingmembranepeelingformacularholesurgery |