Cargando…

User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Parliament of Burkina Faso passed a policy to reduce the direct costs of obstetric services and neonatal care in the country’s health centres, aiming to lower the country’s high national maternal mortality and morbidity rates. Implementation was via a “partial exemption” cov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ameur, Amal Ben, Ridde, Valéry, Bado, Aristide R, Ingabire, Marie-Gloriose, Queuille, Ludovic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-412
_version_ 1782251742786748416
author Ameur, Amal Ben
Ridde, Valéry
Bado, Aristide R
Ingabire, Marie-Gloriose
Queuille, Ludovic
author_facet Ameur, Amal Ben
Ridde, Valéry
Bado, Aristide R
Ingabire, Marie-Gloriose
Queuille, Ludovic
author_sort Ameur, Amal Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Parliament of Burkina Faso passed a policy to reduce the direct costs of obstetric services and neonatal care in the country’s health centres, aiming to lower the country’s high national maternal mortality and morbidity rates. Implementation was via a “partial exemption” covering 80% of the costs. In 2008 the German NGO HELP launched a pilot project in two health districts to eliminate the remaining 20% of user fees. Regardless of any exemptions, women giving birth in Burkina Faso’s health centres face additional expenses that often represent an additional barrier to accessing health services. We compared the total cost of giving birth in health centres offering partial exemption versus those with full exemption to assess the impact on additional out-of-pocket fees. METHODS: A case–control study was performed to compare medical expenses. Case subjects were women who gave birth in 12 health centres located in the Dori and Sebba districts, where HELP provided full fee exemption for obstetric services and neonatal care. Controls were from six health centres in the neighbouring Djibo district where a partial fee exemption was in place. A random sample of approximately 50 women per health centre was selected for a total of 870 women. RESULTS: There was an implementation gap regarding the full exemption for obstetric services and neonatal care. Only 1.1% of the sample from Sebba but 17.5% of the group from Dori had excessive spending on birth related costs, indicating that women who delivered in Sebba were much less exposed to excessive medical expenses than women from Dori. Additional out-of-pocket fees in the full exemption health districts took into account household ability to pay, with poorer women generally paying less. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the elimination of fees for facility-based births benefits especially the poorest households. The existence of excessive spending related to direct costs of giving birth is of concern, making it urgent for the government to remove all direct fees for obstetric and neonatal care. However, the policy of completely abolishing user fees is insufficient; the implementation process must have a thorough monitoring system to reduce implementation gaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3512510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35125102012-12-04 User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation Ameur, Amal Ben Ridde, Valéry Bado, Aristide R Ingabire, Marie-Gloriose Queuille, Ludovic BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Parliament of Burkina Faso passed a policy to reduce the direct costs of obstetric services and neonatal care in the country’s health centres, aiming to lower the country’s high national maternal mortality and morbidity rates. Implementation was via a “partial exemption” covering 80% of the costs. In 2008 the German NGO HELP launched a pilot project in two health districts to eliminate the remaining 20% of user fees. Regardless of any exemptions, women giving birth in Burkina Faso’s health centres face additional expenses that often represent an additional barrier to accessing health services. We compared the total cost of giving birth in health centres offering partial exemption versus those with full exemption to assess the impact on additional out-of-pocket fees. METHODS: A case–control study was performed to compare medical expenses. Case subjects were women who gave birth in 12 health centres located in the Dori and Sebba districts, where HELP provided full fee exemption for obstetric services and neonatal care. Controls were from six health centres in the neighbouring Djibo district where a partial fee exemption was in place. A random sample of approximately 50 women per health centre was selected for a total of 870 women. RESULTS: There was an implementation gap regarding the full exemption for obstetric services and neonatal care. Only 1.1% of the sample from Sebba but 17.5% of the group from Dori had excessive spending on birth related costs, indicating that women who delivered in Sebba were much less exposed to excessive medical expenses than women from Dori. Additional out-of-pocket fees in the full exemption health districts took into account household ability to pay, with poorer women generally paying less. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the elimination of fees for facility-based births benefits especially the poorest households. The existence of excessive spending related to direct costs of giving birth is of concern, making it urgent for the government to remove all direct fees for obstetric and neonatal care. However, the policy of completely abolishing user fees is insufficient; the implementation process must have a thorough monitoring system to reduce implementation gaps. BioMed Central 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3512510/ /pubmed/23171417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-412 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ben Ameur et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ameur, Amal Ben
Ridde, Valéry
Bado, Aristide R
Ingabire, Marie-Gloriose
Queuille, Ludovic
User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation
title User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation
title_full User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation
title_fullStr User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation
title_full_unstemmed User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation
title_short User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation
title_sort user fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in burkina faso: the need for careful implementation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-412
work_keys_str_mv AT ameuramalben userfeeexemptionsandexcessivehouseholdspendingfornormaldeliveryinburkinafasotheneedforcarefulimplementation
AT riddevalery userfeeexemptionsandexcessivehouseholdspendingfornormaldeliveryinburkinafasotheneedforcarefulimplementation
AT badoaristider userfeeexemptionsandexcessivehouseholdspendingfornormaldeliveryinburkinafasotheneedforcarefulimplementation
AT ingabiremariegloriose userfeeexemptionsandexcessivehouseholdspendingfornormaldeliveryinburkinafasotheneedforcarefulimplementation
AT queuilleludovic userfeeexemptionsandexcessivehouseholdspendingfornormaldeliveryinburkinafasotheneedforcarefulimplementation