Cargando…

CD4 count evolution of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care

OBJECTIVE: To study the evolution of CD4 count of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care. METHODS: Adult patients newly diagnosed with HIV in 2007 who entered in care in the AIDS Reference Centres (ARC) and remained in care for at least one year were studied until end...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasse, A, Van Beckhoven, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512513/
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.6.18102
_version_ 1782251743472517120
author Sasse, A
Van Beckhoven, D
author_facet Sasse, A
Van Beckhoven, D
author_sort Sasse, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study the evolution of CD4 count of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care. METHODS: Adult patients newly diagnosed with HIV in 2007 who entered in care in the AIDS Reference Centres (ARC) and remained in care for at least one year were studied until end 2009. Optimal CD4 evolution was defined as having a CD4 count above 350 cells/mm(3) after 1 year in HIV care, or an increasing rate exceeding 50 cells/mm(3) per year, and this regardless of antiviral therapy. The proportion of patients with optimal CD4 evolution was measured and factors associated with outcome were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: 482 patients were included. Median age was 37 years, 31.1% were females, 51.7% Belgians, 32.2% from Sub-Saharan Africa, 50.5% heterosexual, 48.7% MSM. 59.5% had a CD4 count above 350 at entry in care, 11.2% did not have a regular retention in care (at least 1 consultation/6-month period). 401 (83.2%) patients had an optimal CD4 evolution after 1 year in care. 60.5% of patients with non-optimal evolution had a CD4 count below 350 at entry in care. Although the proportion of female sex, heterosexual transmission, Sub-Saharan nationality and low retention in care was higher in the non-optimal CD4 evolution group compared to the optimal group, none of these characteristics showed a significant association with non-optimal CD4 count evolution. CONCLUSION: 83.2% of patients had an optimal CD4 evolution after at least 1 year in HIV care. This indicator, analysed together with indicators of entry and retention in care, could contribute to a better monitoring of the HIV epidemic and to identify more precisely the steps in care system that could be improved. These indicators should be fully integrated in HIV surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3512513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35125132012-12-03 CD4 count evolution of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care Sasse, A Van Beckhoven, D J Int AIDS Soc Poster Abstract – P17 OBJECTIVE: To study the evolution of CD4 count of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care. METHODS: Adult patients newly diagnosed with HIV in 2007 who entered in care in the AIDS Reference Centres (ARC) and remained in care for at least one year were studied until end 2009. Optimal CD4 evolution was defined as having a CD4 count above 350 cells/mm(3) after 1 year in HIV care, or an increasing rate exceeding 50 cells/mm(3) per year, and this regardless of antiviral therapy. The proportion of patients with optimal CD4 evolution was measured and factors associated with outcome were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: 482 patients were included. Median age was 37 years, 31.1% were females, 51.7% Belgians, 32.2% from Sub-Saharan Africa, 50.5% heterosexual, 48.7% MSM. 59.5% had a CD4 count above 350 at entry in care, 11.2% did not have a regular retention in care (at least 1 consultation/6-month period). 401 (83.2%) patients had an optimal CD4 evolution after 1 year in care. 60.5% of patients with non-optimal evolution had a CD4 count below 350 at entry in care. Although the proportion of female sex, heterosexual transmission, Sub-Saharan nationality and low retention in care was higher in the non-optimal CD4 evolution group compared to the optimal group, none of these characteristics showed a significant association with non-optimal CD4 count evolution. CONCLUSION: 83.2% of patients had an optimal CD4 evolution after at least 1 year in HIV care. This indicator, analysed together with indicators of entry and retention in care, could contribute to a better monitoring of the HIV epidemic and to identify more precisely the steps in care system that could be improved. These indicators should be fully integrated in HIV surveillance. International AIDS Society 2012-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3512513/ http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.6.18102 Text en © 2012 Sasse A and Van Beckhoven D. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstract – P17
Sasse, A
Van Beckhoven, D
CD4 count evolution of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care
title CD4 count evolution of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care
title_full CD4 count evolution of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care
title_fullStr CD4 count evolution of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care
title_full_unstemmed CD4 count evolution of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care
title_short CD4 count evolution of HIV-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care
title_sort cd4 count evolution of hiv-infected patients in follow-up as an indicator of quality of care
topic Poster Abstract – P17
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512513/
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.6.18102
work_keys_str_mv AT sassea cd4countevolutionofhivinfectedpatientsinfollowupasanindicatorofqualityofcare
AT vanbeckhovend cd4countevolutionofhivinfectedpatientsinfollowupasanindicatorofqualityofcare
AT cd4countevolutionofhivinfectedpatientsinfollowupasanindicatorofqualityofcare