Cargando…

‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Vocational integration of people with mental illness is poor despite their willingness to work. The ‘Individual Placement and Support’ (IPS) model which emphasises rapid and direct job placement and continuing support to patient and employer has proven to be the most effective vocational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordt, Carlos, Brantschen, Elisabeth, Kawohl, Wolfram, Bärtsch, Bettina, Haker, Helene, Rüsch, Nicolas, Rössler, Wulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-165
_version_ 1782251743706349568
author Nordt, Carlos
Brantschen, Elisabeth
Kawohl, Wolfram
Bärtsch, Bettina
Haker, Helene
Rüsch, Nicolas
Rössler, Wulf
author_facet Nordt, Carlos
Brantschen, Elisabeth
Kawohl, Wolfram
Bärtsch, Bettina
Haker, Helene
Rüsch, Nicolas
Rössler, Wulf
author_sort Nordt, Carlos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vocational integration of people with mental illness is poor despite their willingness to work. The ‘Individual Placement and Support’ (IPS) model which emphasises rapid and direct job placement and continuing support to patient and employer has proven to be the most effective vocational intervention programme. Various studies have shown that every second patient with severe mental illness was able to find competitive employment within 18 months. However, the goal of taking up employment within two months was rarely achieved. Thus, we aim to test whether the new concept of limited placement budgets increases the effectiveness of IPS. METHODS/DESIGN: Six job coaches in six out-patients psychiatric clinics in the Canton of Zurich support unemployed patients of their clinic who seek competitive employment. Between June 2010 and May 2011 patients (N=100) are randomly assigned to three different placement budgets of 25h, 40h, or 55h working hours of job coaches. Support lasts two years for those who find a job. The intervention ends for those who fail to find competitive employment when the respective placement budgets run out. The primary outcome measure is the time between study inclusion and first competitive employment that lasted three months or longer. Over a period of three years interviews are carried out every six months to measure changes in motivation, stigmatization, social network and social support, quality of life, job satisfaction, financial situation, and health conditions. Cognitive and social-cognitive tests are conducted at baseline to control for confounding variables. DISCUSSION: This study will show whether the effectiveness of IPS can be increased by the new concept of limited placement budgets. It will also be examined whether competitive employment leads in the long term to an improvement of mental illness, to a transfer of the psychiatric support system to private and vocational networks, to an increase in financial independence, to a reduction of perceived and internalized stigma, and to an increase in quality of life and job satisfaction of the patient. In addition, factors connected with fast competitive employment and holding that job down in the long term are being examined (motivation, stigmatization, social and financial situation). TRIAL REGISTER: ISRCTN89670872
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3512514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35125142012-12-04 ‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial Nordt, Carlos Brantschen, Elisabeth Kawohl, Wolfram Bärtsch, Bettina Haker, Helene Rüsch, Nicolas Rössler, Wulf BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Vocational integration of people with mental illness is poor despite their willingness to work. The ‘Individual Placement and Support’ (IPS) model which emphasises rapid and direct job placement and continuing support to patient and employer has proven to be the most effective vocational intervention programme. Various studies have shown that every second patient with severe mental illness was able to find competitive employment within 18 months. However, the goal of taking up employment within two months was rarely achieved. Thus, we aim to test whether the new concept of limited placement budgets increases the effectiveness of IPS. METHODS/DESIGN: Six job coaches in six out-patients psychiatric clinics in the Canton of Zurich support unemployed patients of their clinic who seek competitive employment. Between June 2010 and May 2011 patients (N=100) are randomly assigned to three different placement budgets of 25h, 40h, or 55h working hours of job coaches. Support lasts two years for those who find a job. The intervention ends for those who fail to find competitive employment when the respective placement budgets run out. The primary outcome measure is the time between study inclusion and first competitive employment that lasted three months or longer. Over a period of three years interviews are carried out every six months to measure changes in motivation, stigmatization, social network and social support, quality of life, job satisfaction, financial situation, and health conditions. Cognitive and social-cognitive tests are conducted at baseline to control for confounding variables. DISCUSSION: This study will show whether the effectiveness of IPS can be increased by the new concept of limited placement budgets. It will also be examined whether competitive employment leads in the long term to an improvement of mental illness, to a transfer of the psychiatric support system to private and vocational networks, to an increase in financial independence, to a reduction of perceived and internalized stigma, and to an increase in quality of life and job satisfaction of the patient. In addition, factors connected with fast competitive employment and holding that job down in the long term are being examined (motivation, stigmatization, social and financial situation). TRIAL REGISTER: ISRCTN89670872 BioMed Central 2012-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3512514/ /pubmed/23034095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-165 Text en Copyright ©2012 Nordt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Nordt, Carlos
Brantschen, Elisabeth
Kawohl, Wolfram
Bärtsch, Bettina
Haker, Helene
Rüsch, Nicolas
Rössler, Wulf
‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title ‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full ‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr ‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed ‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_short ‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_sort ‘placement budgets’ for supported employment – improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-165
work_keys_str_mv AT nordtcarlos placementbudgetsforsupportedemploymentimprovingcompetitiveemploymentforpeoplewithmentalillnessstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brantschenelisabeth placementbudgetsforsupportedemploymentimprovingcompetitiveemploymentforpeoplewithmentalillnessstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kawohlwolfram placementbudgetsforsupportedemploymentimprovingcompetitiveemploymentforpeoplewithmentalillnessstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bartschbettina placementbudgetsforsupportedemploymentimprovingcompetitiveemploymentforpeoplewithmentalillnessstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hakerhelene placementbudgetsforsupportedemploymentimprovingcompetitiveemploymentforpeoplewithmentalillnessstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ruschnicolas placementbudgetsforsupportedemploymentimprovingcompetitiveemploymentforpeoplewithmentalillnessstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rosslerwulf placementbudgetsforsupportedemploymentimprovingcompetitiveemploymentforpeoplewithmentalillnessstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial