Cargando…

369 Comparison of Skin and Conjunctival Reactivity to Aeroallergens

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is based on symptoms and positive skin prick test (SPT) to common aeroallergens. Allergens identified by SPT may not be clinically relevant to the eye. This study aims to compare the skin and conjunctival allergic responses to dust mites and gras...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mercer Mourão, Elizabeth Maria, Rosario, Nelson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512845/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000412132.58554.89
_version_ 1782251815643906048
author Mercer Mourão, Elizabeth Maria
Rosario, Nelson
author_facet Mercer Mourão, Elizabeth Maria
Rosario, Nelson
author_sort Mercer Mourão, Elizabeth Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is based on symptoms and positive skin prick test (SPT) to common aeroallergens. Allergens identified by SPT may not be clinically relevant to the eye. This study aims to compare the skin and conjunctival allergic responses to dust mites and grass pollen. METHODS: 56 subjects (29 ± 11.4 years) with ocular allergy and sensitized to dust mites and/or grass pollens were recruited for the study. Standardized extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p 1 83.8 mcg/mL), Blomia tropicalis (Blo t 5 462.5 ng/mL) and Lolium perenne (Phl p 5 399.2 mcg /mL) were used for skin test end point titration. Increasing 2-fold allergen dilutions were tested in forearms until no skin reaction was elicited. The end point was considered the dilution immediately above that one. Conjunctival provocation test (CPT) was performed with progressive doses of allergen (1:32, 1:16, 1:8, 1:4, 1:2) to the involved allergen. All tests were performed after obtaining written informed consent and out of grass pollen season. Subjects should be assymptomatic and off antiallergic medication. RESULTS: Of 82 conjunctival tests (30 Lp; 26 Bt; 26 Dp), 76% (62/82) occurred with 1:8 to 1:2 dilutions, 18% (15/82) with 1:32 to 1:16 dilutions and 6% (5/82) were negative. CPT were positive in 76% of subjects with Der p 1 (10.5–41.9 mcg/mL), Blo t 5 (57.8–231.3 ng/mL) and Phl p 5 (49.9–199.6 mcg/mL). SPT were positive for allergens with 1:1024 to 1:128 dilutions in 22% (18/82), with 1:64 to 1:16 dilutions in 63% (52/82) and with 1:8 to 1:2 dilutions in 11% (9/82). Three subjects had negative SPT. Allergen threshold dose to trigger a response in the skin was lower than in the eye for all 3 allergens tested (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Reactivity to aeroallergens in provocation tests requires higher allergen dose for CPT than SPT. Positive SPT with standardized allergenic extracts is predictive of clinical relevance in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3512845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher World Allergy Organization Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35128452012-12-21 369 Comparison of Skin and Conjunctival Reactivity to Aeroallergens Mercer Mourão, Elizabeth Maria Rosario, Nelson World Allergy Organ J Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is based on symptoms and positive skin prick test (SPT) to common aeroallergens. Allergens identified by SPT may not be clinically relevant to the eye. This study aims to compare the skin and conjunctival allergic responses to dust mites and grass pollen. METHODS: 56 subjects (29 ± 11.4 years) with ocular allergy and sensitized to dust mites and/or grass pollens were recruited for the study. Standardized extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p 1 83.8 mcg/mL), Blomia tropicalis (Blo t 5 462.5 ng/mL) and Lolium perenne (Phl p 5 399.2 mcg /mL) were used for skin test end point titration. Increasing 2-fold allergen dilutions were tested in forearms until no skin reaction was elicited. The end point was considered the dilution immediately above that one. Conjunctival provocation test (CPT) was performed with progressive doses of allergen (1:32, 1:16, 1:8, 1:4, 1:2) to the involved allergen. All tests were performed after obtaining written informed consent and out of grass pollen season. Subjects should be assymptomatic and off antiallergic medication. RESULTS: Of 82 conjunctival tests (30 Lp; 26 Bt; 26 Dp), 76% (62/82) occurred with 1:8 to 1:2 dilutions, 18% (15/82) with 1:32 to 1:16 dilutions and 6% (5/82) were negative. CPT were positive in 76% of subjects with Der p 1 (10.5–41.9 mcg/mL), Blo t 5 (57.8–231.3 ng/mL) and Phl p 5 (49.9–199.6 mcg/mL). SPT were positive for allergens with 1:1024 to 1:128 dilutions in 22% (18/82), with 1:64 to 1:16 dilutions in 63% (52/82) and with 1:8 to 1:2 dilutions in 11% (9/82). Three subjects had negative SPT. Allergen threshold dose to trigger a response in the skin was lower than in the eye for all 3 allergens tested (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Reactivity to aeroallergens in provocation tests requires higher allergen dose for CPT than SPT. Positive SPT with standardized allergenic extracts is predictive of clinical relevance in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis. World Allergy Organization Journal 2012-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3512845/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000412132.58554.89 Text en Copyright © 2012 by World Allergy Organization
spellingShingle Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress
Mercer Mourão, Elizabeth Maria
Rosario, Nelson
369 Comparison of Skin and Conjunctival Reactivity to Aeroallergens
title 369 Comparison of Skin and Conjunctival Reactivity to Aeroallergens
title_full 369 Comparison of Skin and Conjunctival Reactivity to Aeroallergens
title_fullStr 369 Comparison of Skin and Conjunctival Reactivity to Aeroallergens
title_full_unstemmed 369 Comparison of Skin and Conjunctival Reactivity to Aeroallergens
title_short 369 Comparison of Skin and Conjunctival Reactivity to Aeroallergens
title_sort 369 comparison of skin and conjunctival reactivity to aeroallergens
topic Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512845/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000412132.58554.89
work_keys_str_mv AT mercermouraoelizabethmaria 369comparisonofskinandconjunctivalreactivitytoaeroallergens
AT rosarionelson 369comparisonofskinandconjunctivalreactivitytoaeroallergens