Cargando…

187 Reduction in Asthma Deteriorations in Subjects with Persistent Asthma not Well Controlled on Low-, Medium-, or High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids: A Pooled Analysis From Three Clinical Trials Using Combined Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol

BACKGROUND: We present a post hoc analysis from 3 phase III clinical trials examining the effects of mometasone furoate/formoterol (MF/F) combination therapy on asthma deterioration in subjects previously not well controlled on low-, medium-, or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). METHODS: A 2-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinstein, Steven, Nathan, Robert, Meltzer, Eli, Gates, Davis, Nolte, Hendrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512925/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000411944.28600.9b
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We present a post hoc analysis from 3 phase III clinical trials examining the effects of mometasone furoate/formoterol (MF/F) combination therapy on asthma deterioration in subjects previously not well controlled on low-, medium-, or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). METHODS: A 2- to 3-week run-in period with twice-daily (BID) MF 100 μg (MF/F 100/10 μg BID study), MF 200 μg (MF/F 200/10 μg BID study), or MF 400 μg (MF/F 400/10 μg BID study) was performed before subjects (aged ≥12 years) were randomized to BID: MF/F 100/10 μg, MF 100 μg, F 10 μg, or placebo for 26 weeks (n = 746; MF/F 100/10 μg BID study); MF/F 200/10 μg, MF 200 μg, F 10 μg, or placebo for 26 weeks (n = 781; MF/F 200/10 μg BID study); or MF/F 200/10 μg, MF/F 400/10 μg, or MF 400 μg for 12 weeks (n = 728; MF/F 400/10 μg BID study). Assessment of asthma deterioration (ie, 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV(1)], 30% decrease in peak expiratory flow [PEF] on ≥2 consecutive days, or clinically judged deterioration [ie, emergency treatment, hospitalization, or treatment with excluded medications]) was a coprimary endpoint for the MF/F 100/10 μg BID and 200/10 μg BID studies and a secondary endpoint for the MF/F 400/10 μg BID study. Post hoc pair-wise comparisons of pooled MF/F vs pooled MF, F, and placebo treatment groups were performed. RESULTS: Sample sizes in this pooled analysis were 861 for MF/F, 620 for MF, 390 for F, and 384 for placebo. There was a significantly lower incidence of asthma deterioration with MF/F (17.2%) versus MF (26.1%; P = 0.002), F (49.5%; P < 0.001), and placebo (50.8%; P < 0.001). Incidence of individual asthma deterioration criteria was 7.0% for MF/F, 10.0% for MF, 13.8% for F, and 17.7% for placebo for FEV(1) reduction; 7.5%, 12.6%, 27.2%, and 26.3%, respectively, for PEF reduction; and 2.1%, 2.6%, 6.7%, and 5.2% for clinically judged deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: MF/F-treated subjects experienced a significantly lower rate of asthma deterioration compared with MF, F, and placebo in subjects previously not well controlled on low-, medium-, or high-dose ICS.