Cargando…

76 Factors Associated with Development of Food Allergy in Liver-Transplanted Children

BACKGROUND: The development of food allergy (FA) after transplantation has been described mainly about liver transplantation in children (Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009; 20: 741–747). It has been becoming important issue in this population. Although tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy has been consi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shoda, Tetsuo, Nomura, Ichiro, Ohya, Yukihiro, Sakamoto, Seisuke, Kasahara, Mureo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512931/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000411821.16388.df
_version_ 1782251835750350848
author Shoda, Tetsuo
Nomura, Ichiro
Ohya, Yukihiro
Sakamoto, Seisuke
Kasahara, Mureo
author_facet Shoda, Tetsuo
Nomura, Ichiro
Ohya, Yukihiro
Sakamoto, Seisuke
Kasahara, Mureo
author_sort Shoda, Tetsuo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of food allergy (FA) after transplantation has been described mainly about liver transplantation in children (Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009; 20: 741–747). It has been becoming important issue in this population. Although tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy has been considered a significant risk factor (J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011; 127: 1296–1298), other risk factors are not identified yet. This study was undertaken to evaluate the risk factors other than tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of pediatric liver transplant recipients in our hospital. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent liver transplantation during study period. Data collected including preceding-hepatic diseases, the number of previous surgeries, age at liver transplantation and etc. RESULTS: Between November 2005 and May 2010, 106 children received liver transplantation. The most common indication for liver transplantation was biliary atresia (BA; 47 patiens, 44.3%). The other conditions were: congenital metabolic diseases in 27 patients, fulminant hepatic failure in 19, liver cirrhosis in 6, congenital absence of portal vein in 3, congenital hepatic fibrosis in 2 and hepatic tumor in 2 patients. After transplantation, all the patients received immunosuppressive therapy based on tacrolimus regimen. Fifteen patients (10 female and 5 male) developed new-onset FA (14.2%). The average age at transplantation was 10 months and FA has been developed within 2 years (median 11 months, IQR, 4.5–19.0). Eleven patients with BA (23.4%) and 4 patients with the other conditions (6.8%) developed new-onset FA (P = 0.023). Among the patients who developed FA, the number of previous surgeries was significantly higher in patients with BA (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: New-onset food allergy after liver transplantation is now becoming a significant problem. We observed a trend toward an excess of FA in patients with BA compared to patients with other indications for liver transplantation. Patients with BA received surgical operations in several times before liver transplantation. Frequent operations might add some stimulation to generate new-onset FA and should be considered as a susceptible subgroup that requires specific attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3512931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher World Allergy Organization Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35129312012-12-21 76 Factors Associated with Development of Food Allergy in Liver-Transplanted Children Shoda, Tetsuo Nomura, Ichiro Ohya, Yukihiro Sakamoto, Seisuke Kasahara, Mureo World Allergy Organ J Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress BACKGROUND: The development of food allergy (FA) after transplantation has been described mainly about liver transplantation in children (Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009; 20: 741–747). It has been becoming important issue in this population. Although tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy has been considered a significant risk factor (J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011; 127: 1296–1298), other risk factors are not identified yet. This study was undertaken to evaluate the risk factors other than tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of pediatric liver transplant recipients in our hospital. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent liver transplantation during study period. Data collected including preceding-hepatic diseases, the number of previous surgeries, age at liver transplantation and etc. RESULTS: Between November 2005 and May 2010, 106 children received liver transplantation. The most common indication for liver transplantation was biliary atresia (BA; 47 patiens, 44.3%). The other conditions were: congenital metabolic diseases in 27 patients, fulminant hepatic failure in 19, liver cirrhosis in 6, congenital absence of portal vein in 3, congenital hepatic fibrosis in 2 and hepatic tumor in 2 patients. After transplantation, all the patients received immunosuppressive therapy based on tacrolimus regimen. Fifteen patients (10 female and 5 male) developed new-onset FA (14.2%). The average age at transplantation was 10 months and FA has been developed within 2 years (median 11 months, IQR, 4.5–19.0). Eleven patients with BA (23.4%) and 4 patients with the other conditions (6.8%) developed new-onset FA (P = 0.023). Among the patients who developed FA, the number of previous surgeries was significantly higher in patients with BA (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: New-onset food allergy after liver transplantation is now becoming a significant problem. We observed a trend toward an excess of FA in patients with BA compared to patients with other indications for liver transplantation. Patients with BA received surgical operations in several times before liver transplantation. Frequent operations might add some stimulation to generate new-onset FA and should be considered as a susceptible subgroup that requires specific attention. World Allergy Organization Journal 2012-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3512931/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000411821.16388.df Text en Copyright © 2012 by World Allergy Organization
spellingShingle Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress
Shoda, Tetsuo
Nomura, Ichiro
Ohya, Yukihiro
Sakamoto, Seisuke
Kasahara, Mureo
76 Factors Associated with Development of Food Allergy in Liver-Transplanted Children
title 76 Factors Associated with Development of Food Allergy in Liver-Transplanted Children
title_full 76 Factors Associated with Development of Food Allergy in Liver-Transplanted Children
title_fullStr 76 Factors Associated with Development of Food Allergy in Liver-Transplanted Children
title_full_unstemmed 76 Factors Associated with Development of Food Allergy in Liver-Transplanted Children
title_short 76 Factors Associated with Development of Food Allergy in Liver-Transplanted Children
title_sort 76 factors associated with development of food allergy in liver-transplanted children
topic Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3512931/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000411821.16388.df
work_keys_str_mv AT shodatetsuo 76factorsassociatedwithdevelopmentoffoodallergyinlivertransplantedchildren
AT nomuraichiro 76factorsassociatedwithdevelopmentoffoodallergyinlivertransplantedchildren
AT ohyayukihiro 76factorsassociatedwithdevelopmentoffoodallergyinlivertransplantedchildren
AT sakamotoseisuke 76factorsassociatedwithdevelopmentoffoodallergyinlivertransplantedchildren
AT kasaharamureo 76factorsassociatedwithdevelopmentoffoodallergyinlivertransplantedchildren