Cargando…

365 Patch Testing Results in Contact Dermatitis from the Allergist's Perspective

BACKGROUND: Contact Dermatitis (CD) is a frequently encountered skin disease by allergists and dermatologists that results from contact with external allergens. Patch Testing (PT) remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of allergic CD. Studies evaluating PT from allergy practices are lacking. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aquino, Marcella, Michelis, Mary Ann, Lighvani, Sebastian, Davis-Lorton, Mark, Fonacier, Luz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513026/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000412128.79639.80
_version_ 1782251858255937536
author Aquino, Marcella
Michelis, Mary Ann
Lighvani, Sebastian
Davis-Lorton, Mark
Fonacier, Luz
author_facet Aquino, Marcella
Michelis, Mary Ann
Lighvani, Sebastian
Davis-Lorton, Mark
Fonacier, Luz
author_sort Aquino, Marcella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contact Dermatitis (CD) is a frequently encountered skin disease by allergists and dermatologists that results from contact with external allergens. Patch Testing (PT) remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of allergic CD. Studies evaluating PT from allergy practices are lacking. METHODS: A multi-center, retrospective chart review of PT within the last 5 years at allergy practices in 3 institutions. We report PT results using allergens in the Thin-Layer Rapid-Use Epicutaneous Test (TT) and additional supplemental allergens [North American Contact Dermatitis (NACD) Panel, Dormer Cosmetic Panel, hairdresser's panel, corticosteroid panel and personal products]. Additionally, patient characteristics including age, gender, occupation, dermatitis site, history of atopic disease and final diagnosis were also obtained. RESULTS: A total of 427 patients (mean age = 49.8 years) were patch tested, 82% were female, 54% reported an atopic history (history of asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis or food allergy), 30% were tested with TT, 60% with NACD panel, 30% with cosmetic series, 15% with corticosteroid series and 35% with personal products. The 5 most common positive PT allergens were nickel sulfate, fragrance mix I, P-phenylenediamine, thimerosal and cobalt chloride. The most common dermatitis sites were eyelid/periorbital (31%), facial (25%) and trunk (21%). 56.9% of patients were positive to at least one TT allergen. 25.6% of patients were positive to both a TT and a supplemental allergen (these patients would have been “partially evaluated” with TT allergens alone as they are positive to at least 1 TT allergen and 1 supplemental allergen). 12.5% of patients were negative to a TT allergen and positive to at least 1 supplemental allergen only (these patients would have been “missed” as they are negative to all TT allergens, but positive to at least 1 supplemental allergen). CONCLUSIONS: Nickel remains the most common allergen. When evaluating patients with CD, testing with TT allergens alone would miss 12.5% of patients while 25.6% of patients would be only partially evaluated. As half of our patients were positive to at least 1 TT allergen, the TT remains an adequate screening tool but a more comprehensive panel may be needed to fully evaluate contact dermatitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3513026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher World Allergy Organization Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35130262012-12-21 365 Patch Testing Results in Contact Dermatitis from the Allergist's Perspective Aquino, Marcella Michelis, Mary Ann Lighvani, Sebastian Davis-Lorton, Mark Fonacier, Luz World Allergy Organ J Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress BACKGROUND: Contact Dermatitis (CD) is a frequently encountered skin disease by allergists and dermatologists that results from contact with external allergens. Patch Testing (PT) remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of allergic CD. Studies evaluating PT from allergy practices are lacking. METHODS: A multi-center, retrospective chart review of PT within the last 5 years at allergy practices in 3 institutions. We report PT results using allergens in the Thin-Layer Rapid-Use Epicutaneous Test (TT) and additional supplemental allergens [North American Contact Dermatitis (NACD) Panel, Dormer Cosmetic Panel, hairdresser's panel, corticosteroid panel and personal products]. Additionally, patient characteristics including age, gender, occupation, dermatitis site, history of atopic disease and final diagnosis were also obtained. RESULTS: A total of 427 patients (mean age = 49.8 years) were patch tested, 82% were female, 54% reported an atopic history (history of asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis or food allergy), 30% were tested with TT, 60% with NACD panel, 30% with cosmetic series, 15% with corticosteroid series and 35% with personal products. The 5 most common positive PT allergens were nickel sulfate, fragrance mix I, P-phenylenediamine, thimerosal and cobalt chloride. The most common dermatitis sites were eyelid/periorbital (31%), facial (25%) and trunk (21%). 56.9% of patients were positive to at least one TT allergen. 25.6% of patients were positive to both a TT and a supplemental allergen (these patients would have been “partially evaluated” with TT allergens alone as they are positive to at least 1 TT allergen and 1 supplemental allergen). 12.5% of patients were negative to a TT allergen and positive to at least 1 supplemental allergen only (these patients would have been “missed” as they are negative to all TT allergens, but positive to at least 1 supplemental allergen). CONCLUSIONS: Nickel remains the most common allergen. When evaluating patients with CD, testing with TT allergens alone would miss 12.5% of patients while 25.6% of patients would be only partially evaluated. As half of our patients were positive to at least 1 TT allergen, the TT remains an adequate screening tool but a more comprehensive panel may be needed to fully evaluate contact dermatitis. World Allergy Organization Journal 2012-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3513026/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000412128.79639.80 Text en Copyright © 2012 by World Allergy Organization
spellingShingle Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress
Aquino, Marcella
Michelis, Mary Ann
Lighvani, Sebastian
Davis-Lorton, Mark
Fonacier, Luz
365 Patch Testing Results in Contact Dermatitis from the Allergist's Perspective
title 365 Patch Testing Results in Contact Dermatitis from the Allergist's Perspective
title_full 365 Patch Testing Results in Contact Dermatitis from the Allergist's Perspective
title_fullStr 365 Patch Testing Results in Contact Dermatitis from the Allergist's Perspective
title_full_unstemmed 365 Patch Testing Results in Contact Dermatitis from the Allergist's Perspective
title_short 365 Patch Testing Results in Contact Dermatitis from the Allergist's Perspective
title_sort 365 patch testing results in contact dermatitis from the allergist's perspective
topic Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513026/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000412128.79639.80
work_keys_str_mv AT aquinomarcella 365patchtestingresultsincontactdermatitisfromtheallergistsperspective
AT michelismaryann 365patchtestingresultsincontactdermatitisfromtheallergistsperspective
AT lighvanisebastian 365patchtestingresultsincontactdermatitisfromtheallergistsperspective
AT davislortonmark 365patchtestingresultsincontactdermatitisfromtheallergistsperspective
AT fonacierluz 365patchtestingresultsincontactdermatitisfromtheallergistsperspective