Cargando…

75 Efficacy of Slow Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of slow oral immunotherapy (SOIT) is not yet clear, especially regarding tolerance acquisition. METHODS: We recruited 32 cow's milk (CM) allergy confirmed by oral food challenge (OFC). Twenty-five subjects were enrolled as SOIT group, and remaining 7 were as cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogura, Kiyotake, Komata, Takatsugu, Hasegawa, Miho, Hayashi, Noriko, Satou, Miki, Goto, Makiko, Utsunomiya, Tomohiro, Iikura, Katsuhito, Satou, Sakura, Sugizaki, Chizuko, Tomikawa, Morimitsu, Shukuya, Akinori, Imai, Takanori, Ebisawa, Motohiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513047/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000411820.08764.3a
_version_ 1782251863182147584
author Ogura, Kiyotake
Komata, Takatsugu
Hasegawa, Miho
Hayashi, Noriko
Satou, Miki
Goto, Makiko
Utsunomiya, Tomohiro
Iikura, Katsuhito
Satou, Sakura
Sugizaki, Chizuko
Tomikawa, Morimitsu
Shukuya, Akinori
Imai, Takanori
Ebisawa, Motohiro
author_facet Ogura, Kiyotake
Komata, Takatsugu
Hasegawa, Miho
Hayashi, Noriko
Satou, Miki
Goto, Makiko
Utsunomiya, Tomohiro
Iikura, Katsuhito
Satou, Sakura
Sugizaki, Chizuko
Tomikawa, Morimitsu
Shukuya, Akinori
Imai, Takanori
Ebisawa, Motohiro
author_sort Ogura, Kiyotake
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of slow oral immunotherapy (SOIT) is not yet clear, especially regarding tolerance acquisition. METHODS: We recruited 32 cow's milk (CM) allergy confirmed by oral food challenge (OFC). Twenty-five subjects were enrolled as SOIT group, and remaining 7 were as control. The inclusion criteria were as follows; (1) CM allergy without anaphylaxis confirmed by OFC just before the trial, and (2) children >4 years. In SOIT group, they were asked to take small amount of CM at home after the OFC. The initial dose was about 1/4 of the threshold eliciting positive objective symptoms, and it was built up to 200 mL CM depends on the symptoms (build up phase). After reaching 200 mL, they were asked to take 200 mL CM daily until the asymptomatic duration lasting for more than 3m (maintenance phase). The subjects, who completed maintenance phase, underwent OFC to confirm the tolerance acquisition after the cessation of CM ingestion for 2w (confirm-OFC). In control group, they had eliminated CM completely and underwent the confirm-OFC after 9.8 ± 2.9 m (mean ± SD). We investigated the endpoints (adverse reactions, medical treatments, results of confirm-OFC, and laboratory findings), prospectively. RESULTS: In SOIT group (n = 25) and control group (n = 7), the average age was 6.6y and 4.7y, respectively. The average threshold was 52 mL and 17 mL, and the CM specific IgE was 17.6 Ua/mL/9.9 Ua/mL, respectively. The average period of build up and maintenance phases in SOIT group was 80d (n = 25) and 98d (n = 15), respectively. The frequency of adverse reactions in all of build up (1973d) and maintenance phases (2924d) were 13.5% (mild symptoms)/2.3% (moderate symptoms) and 1.7% (mild)/0.3% (moderate), respectively. No patient had administered adrenaline during SOIT. Fifteen subjects in SOIT and 7 in control underwent the confirm-OFC. In SOIT, 8 subjects (53.3%) passed the confirm-OFC, whereas 2 (28.6%) passed in control. There was no statistically significant difference regarding tolerance acquisition between these 2 groups (P = 0.277). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that SOIT for about 1/2 year induces desensitization effectively for CM allergy without severe adverse reactions. Further and longer study would be required to prove accelerated tolerance acquisition by SOIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3513047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher World Allergy Organization Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35130472012-12-21 75 Efficacy of Slow Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy Ogura, Kiyotake Komata, Takatsugu Hasegawa, Miho Hayashi, Noriko Satou, Miki Goto, Makiko Utsunomiya, Tomohiro Iikura, Katsuhito Satou, Sakura Sugizaki, Chizuko Tomikawa, Morimitsu Shukuya, Akinori Imai, Takanori Ebisawa, Motohiro World Allergy Organ J Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of slow oral immunotherapy (SOIT) is not yet clear, especially regarding tolerance acquisition. METHODS: We recruited 32 cow's milk (CM) allergy confirmed by oral food challenge (OFC). Twenty-five subjects were enrolled as SOIT group, and remaining 7 were as control. The inclusion criteria were as follows; (1) CM allergy without anaphylaxis confirmed by OFC just before the trial, and (2) children >4 years. In SOIT group, they were asked to take small amount of CM at home after the OFC. The initial dose was about 1/4 of the threshold eliciting positive objective symptoms, and it was built up to 200 mL CM depends on the symptoms (build up phase). After reaching 200 mL, they were asked to take 200 mL CM daily until the asymptomatic duration lasting for more than 3m (maintenance phase). The subjects, who completed maintenance phase, underwent OFC to confirm the tolerance acquisition after the cessation of CM ingestion for 2w (confirm-OFC). In control group, they had eliminated CM completely and underwent the confirm-OFC after 9.8 ± 2.9 m (mean ± SD). We investigated the endpoints (adverse reactions, medical treatments, results of confirm-OFC, and laboratory findings), prospectively. RESULTS: In SOIT group (n = 25) and control group (n = 7), the average age was 6.6y and 4.7y, respectively. The average threshold was 52 mL and 17 mL, and the CM specific IgE was 17.6 Ua/mL/9.9 Ua/mL, respectively. The average period of build up and maintenance phases in SOIT group was 80d (n = 25) and 98d (n = 15), respectively. The frequency of adverse reactions in all of build up (1973d) and maintenance phases (2924d) were 13.5% (mild symptoms)/2.3% (moderate symptoms) and 1.7% (mild)/0.3% (moderate), respectively. No patient had administered adrenaline during SOIT. Fifteen subjects in SOIT and 7 in control underwent the confirm-OFC. In SOIT, 8 subjects (53.3%) passed the confirm-OFC, whereas 2 (28.6%) passed in control. There was no statistically significant difference regarding tolerance acquisition between these 2 groups (P = 0.277). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that SOIT for about 1/2 year induces desensitization effectively for CM allergy without severe adverse reactions. Further and longer study would be required to prove accelerated tolerance acquisition by SOIT. World Allergy Organization Journal 2012-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3513047/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000411820.08764.3a Text en Copyright © 2012 by World Allergy Organization
spellingShingle Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress
Ogura, Kiyotake
Komata, Takatsugu
Hasegawa, Miho
Hayashi, Noriko
Satou, Miki
Goto, Makiko
Utsunomiya, Tomohiro
Iikura, Katsuhito
Satou, Sakura
Sugizaki, Chizuko
Tomikawa, Morimitsu
Shukuya, Akinori
Imai, Takanori
Ebisawa, Motohiro
75 Efficacy of Slow Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy
title 75 Efficacy of Slow Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy
title_full 75 Efficacy of Slow Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy
title_fullStr 75 Efficacy of Slow Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy
title_full_unstemmed 75 Efficacy of Slow Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy
title_short 75 Efficacy of Slow Oral Immunotherapy for Cow's Milk Allergy
title_sort 75 efficacy of slow oral immunotherapy for cow's milk allergy
topic Abstracts of the XXII World Allergy Congress
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513047/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WOX.0000411820.08764.3a
work_keys_str_mv AT ogurakiyotake 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT komatatakatsugu 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT hasegawamiho 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT hayashinoriko 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT satoumiki 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT gotomakiko 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT utsunomiyatomohiro 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT iikurakatsuhito 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT satousakura 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT sugizakichizuko 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT tomikawamorimitsu 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT shukuyaakinori 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT imaitakanori 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy
AT ebisawamotohiro 75efficacyofsloworalimmunotherapyforcowsmilkallergy