Cargando…
PERSIST: Physician’s Evaluation of Restasis(®) Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review
BACKGROUND: Chronic dry eye disease often requires long-term therapy. Tear film alterations in the setting of dry eye may include reduced tear volume as well as an increase in inflammatory cytokines and osmolarity. Topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis(®); Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226002 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S30261 |
_version_ | 1782251955652919296 |
---|---|
author | Mah, Francis Milner, Mark Yiu, Samuel Donnenfeld, Eric Conway, Taryn M Hollander, David A |
author_facet | Mah, Francis Milner, Mark Yiu, Samuel Donnenfeld, Eric Conway, Taryn M Hollander, David A |
author_sort | Mah, Francis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic dry eye disease often requires long-term therapy. Tear film alterations in the setting of dry eye may include reduced tear volume as well as an increase in inflammatory cytokines and osmolarity. Topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis(®); Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) is indicated to increase tear production in patients with dry eye and reduced tear production presumed to be due to ocular inflammation. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a second trial of topical cyclosporine in patients with dry eye who were previously considered treatment failures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter (three cornea practices) retrospective chart review evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with dry eye who received a second trial of cyclosporine after a prior treatment failure, defined as prior discontinuation of topical cyclosporine after less than 12 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients, most of whom were female (71.4%) and Caucasian (62.9%), were identified. Prior discontinuation was most commonly due to burning/stinging (60%). The median duration of second treatment was 10 months (range 1 week to 45 months). Physician education was provided in the second trial in 97.1% of cases. At initiation of the second trial of cyclosporine, 10 (28.6%) patients received courses of topical corticosteroids. Physicians reported on a questionnaire that 80% of patients achieved clinical benefit with a second trial of cyclosporine. CONCLUSION: A repeat trial with topical cyclosporine can achieve clinical success. Direct patient education via the physician and staff may be key to success. Proper patient education may overcome adherence issues, particularly with respect to the need for long-term treatment of chronic dry eye. This study has the usual limitations associated with a retrospective chart review, and future prospective studies are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3514052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35140522012-12-05 PERSIST: Physician’s Evaluation of Restasis(®) Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review Mah, Francis Milner, Mark Yiu, Samuel Donnenfeld, Eric Conway, Taryn M Hollander, David A Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Chronic dry eye disease often requires long-term therapy. Tear film alterations in the setting of dry eye may include reduced tear volume as well as an increase in inflammatory cytokines and osmolarity. Topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis(®); Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) is indicated to increase tear production in patients with dry eye and reduced tear production presumed to be due to ocular inflammation. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a second trial of topical cyclosporine in patients with dry eye who were previously considered treatment failures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter (three cornea practices) retrospective chart review evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with dry eye who received a second trial of cyclosporine after a prior treatment failure, defined as prior discontinuation of topical cyclosporine after less than 12 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients, most of whom were female (71.4%) and Caucasian (62.9%), were identified. Prior discontinuation was most commonly due to burning/stinging (60%). The median duration of second treatment was 10 months (range 1 week to 45 months). Physician education was provided in the second trial in 97.1% of cases. At initiation of the second trial of cyclosporine, 10 (28.6%) patients received courses of topical corticosteroids. Physicians reported on a questionnaire that 80% of patients achieved clinical benefit with a second trial of cyclosporine. CONCLUSION: A repeat trial with topical cyclosporine can achieve clinical success. Direct patient education via the physician and staff may be key to success. Proper patient education may overcome adherence issues, particularly with respect to the need for long-term treatment of chronic dry eye. This study has the usual limitations associated with a retrospective chart review, and future prospective studies are warranted. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3514052/ /pubmed/23226002 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S30261 Text en © 2012 Mah et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mah, Francis Milner, Mark Yiu, Samuel Donnenfeld, Eric Conway, Taryn M Hollander, David A PERSIST: Physician’s Evaluation of Restasis(®) Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review |
title | PERSIST: Physician’s Evaluation of Restasis(®) Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review |
title_full | PERSIST: Physician’s Evaluation of Restasis(®) Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review |
title_fullStr | PERSIST: Physician’s Evaluation of Restasis(®) Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review |
title_full_unstemmed | PERSIST: Physician’s Evaluation of Restasis(®) Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review |
title_short | PERSIST: Physician’s Evaluation of Restasis(®) Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review |
title_sort | persist: physician’s evaluation of restasis(®) satisfaction in second trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226002 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S30261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahfrancis persistphysiciansevaluationofrestasissatisfactioninsecondtrialoftopicalcyclosporineophthalmicemulsion005fordryeyearetrospectivereview AT milnermark persistphysiciansevaluationofrestasissatisfactioninsecondtrialoftopicalcyclosporineophthalmicemulsion005fordryeyearetrospectivereview AT yiusamuel persistphysiciansevaluationofrestasissatisfactioninsecondtrialoftopicalcyclosporineophthalmicemulsion005fordryeyearetrospectivereview AT donnenfelderic persistphysiciansevaluationofrestasissatisfactioninsecondtrialoftopicalcyclosporineophthalmicemulsion005fordryeyearetrospectivereview AT conwaytarynm persistphysiciansevaluationofrestasissatisfactioninsecondtrialoftopicalcyclosporineophthalmicemulsion005fordryeyearetrospectivereview AT hollanderdavida persistphysiciansevaluationofrestasissatisfactioninsecondtrialoftopicalcyclosporineophthalmicemulsion005fordryeyearetrospectivereview |