Cargando…
Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Myopic photorefractive surgery induces a reduction in central corneal thickness, which may lead to underestimation of intraocular pressure. This retrospective clinical study compared intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynami...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38094 |
_version_ | 1782251957291843584 |
---|---|
author | Shemesh, Gabi Soiberman, Uri Kurtz, Shimon |
author_facet | Shemesh, Gabi Soiberman, Uri Kurtz, Shimon |
author_sort | Shemesh, Gabi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Myopic photorefractive surgery induces a reduction in central corneal thickness, which may lead to underestimation of intraocular pressure. This retrospective clinical study compared intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT-Pascal) in eyes undergoing myopic intralaser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (IntraLASIK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). RESULTS: Of a total of 51 eyes, 21 underwent LASEK and 30 underwent IntraLASIK. By GAT, mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 16.2 ± 1.99 mmHg and postoperatively was 10.84 ± 1.45 mmHg. By DCT, mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 15.9 ± 2.08 mmHg and postoperatively was 16.1 ± 2.3 mmHg. Both preoperative and postoperative differences between measurements made by GAT and DCT were found to be statistically significant (P < 0.04 and P < 0.01, respectively). GAT and DCT readings were unaffected by type of surgery (P = 0.74 and P = 0.46, respectively). CONCLUSION: Postoperative GAT measurements were lower than those obtained by DCT. The difference between preoperative and postoperative DCT measurements was minimal, so DCT may be preferable for the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes undergoing myopic IntraLASIK or LASEK. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3514059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35140592012-12-05 Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK Shemesh, Gabi Soiberman, Uri Kurtz, Shimon Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Myopic photorefractive surgery induces a reduction in central corneal thickness, which may lead to underestimation of intraocular pressure. This retrospective clinical study compared intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT-Pascal) in eyes undergoing myopic intralaser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (IntraLASIK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). RESULTS: Of a total of 51 eyes, 21 underwent LASEK and 30 underwent IntraLASIK. By GAT, mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 16.2 ± 1.99 mmHg and postoperatively was 10.84 ± 1.45 mmHg. By DCT, mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 15.9 ± 2.08 mmHg and postoperatively was 16.1 ± 2.3 mmHg. Both preoperative and postoperative differences between measurements made by GAT and DCT were found to be statistically significant (P < 0.04 and P < 0.01, respectively). GAT and DCT readings were unaffected by type of surgery (P = 0.74 and P = 0.46, respectively). CONCLUSION: Postoperative GAT measurements were lower than those obtained by DCT. The difference between preoperative and postoperative DCT measurements was minimal, so DCT may be preferable for the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes undergoing myopic IntraLASIK or LASEK. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3514059/ /pubmed/23226001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38094 Text en © 2012 Shemesh et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shemesh, Gabi Soiberman, Uri Kurtz, Shimon Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK |
title | Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK |
title_full | Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK |
title_fullStr | Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK |
title_short | Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK |
title_sort | intraocular pressure measurements with goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after intralasik or lasek |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shemeshgabi intraocularpressuremeasurementswithgoldmannapplanationtonometryanddynamiccontourtonometryineyesafterintralasikorlasek AT soibermanuri intraocularpressuremeasurementswithgoldmannapplanationtonometryanddynamiccontourtonometryineyesafterintralasikorlasek AT kurtzshimon intraocularpressuremeasurementswithgoldmannapplanationtonometryanddynamiccontourtonometryineyesafterintralasikorlasek |