Cargando…

Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Myopic photorefractive surgery induces a reduction in central corneal thickness, which may lead to underestimation of intraocular pressure. This retrospective clinical study compared intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shemesh, Gabi, Soiberman, Uri, Kurtz, Shimon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226001
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38094
_version_ 1782251957291843584
author Shemesh, Gabi
Soiberman, Uri
Kurtz, Shimon
author_facet Shemesh, Gabi
Soiberman, Uri
Kurtz, Shimon
author_sort Shemesh, Gabi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Myopic photorefractive surgery induces a reduction in central corneal thickness, which may lead to underestimation of intraocular pressure. This retrospective clinical study compared intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT-Pascal) in eyes undergoing myopic intralaser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (IntraLASIK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). RESULTS: Of a total of 51 eyes, 21 underwent LASEK and 30 underwent IntraLASIK. By GAT, mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 16.2 ± 1.99 mmHg and postoperatively was 10.84 ± 1.45 mmHg. By DCT, mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 15.9 ± 2.08 mmHg and postoperatively was 16.1 ± 2.3 mmHg. Both preoperative and postoperative differences between measurements made by GAT and DCT were found to be statistically significant (P < 0.04 and P < 0.01, respectively). GAT and DCT readings were unaffected by type of surgery (P = 0.74 and P = 0.46, respectively). CONCLUSION: Postoperative GAT measurements were lower than those obtained by DCT. The difference between preoperative and postoperative DCT measurements was minimal, so DCT may be preferable for the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes undergoing myopic IntraLASIK or LASEK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3514059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35140592012-12-05 Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK Shemesh, Gabi Soiberman, Uri Kurtz, Shimon Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Myopic photorefractive surgery induces a reduction in central corneal thickness, which may lead to underestimation of intraocular pressure. This retrospective clinical study compared intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT-Pascal) in eyes undergoing myopic intralaser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (IntraLASIK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). RESULTS: Of a total of 51 eyes, 21 underwent LASEK and 30 underwent IntraLASIK. By GAT, mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 16.2 ± 1.99 mmHg and postoperatively was 10.84 ± 1.45 mmHg. By DCT, mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 15.9 ± 2.08 mmHg and postoperatively was 16.1 ± 2.3 mmHg. Both preoperative and postoperative differences between measurements made by GAT and DCT were found to be statistically significant (P < 0.04 and P < 0.01, respectively). GAT and DCT readings were unaffected by type of surgery (P = 0.74 and P = 0.46, respectively). CONCLUSION: Postoperative GAT measurements were lower than those obtained by DCT. The difference between preoperative and postoperative DCT measurements was minimal, so DCT may be preferable for the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes undergoing myopic IntraLASIK or LASEK. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3514059/ /pubmed/23226001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38094 Text en © 2012 Shemesh et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shemesh, Gabi
Soiberman, Uri
Kurtz, Shimon
Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
title Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
title_full Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
title_fullStr Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
title_short Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
title_sort intraocular pressure measurements with goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after intralasik or lasek
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226001
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38094
work_keys_str_mv AT shemeshgabi intraocularpressuremeasurementswithgoldmannapplanationtonometryanddynamiccontourtonometryineyesafterintralasikorlasek
AT soibermanuri intraocularpressuremeasurementswithgoldmannapplanationtonometryanddynamiccontourtonometryineyesafterintralasikorlasek
AT kurtzshimon intraocularpressuremeasurementswithgoldmannapplanationtonometryanddynamiccontourtonometryineyesafterintralasikorlasek