Cargando…

Comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Liposomal formulations of anthracyclines appear to have favorable toxicity profile when compared with conventional anthracyclines in elderly, high risk cardiac patients and patients with prior use of anthracyclines. Randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety prof...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rafiyath, Shamudheen M, Rasul, Mohammad, Lee, Byung, Wei, Guoqing, Lamba, Gurpreet, Liu, Delong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23210520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2162-3619-1-10
_version_ 1782251966611587072
author Rafiyath, Shamudheen M
Rasul, Mohammad
Lee, Byung
Wei, Guoqing
Lamba, Gurpreet
Liu, Delong
author_facet Rafiyath, Shamudheen M
Rasul, Mohammad
Lee, Byung
Wei, Guoqing
Lamba, Gurpreet
Liu, Delong
author_sort Rafiyath, Shamudheen M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Liposomal formulations of anthracyclines appear to have favorable toxicity profile when compared with conventional anthracyclines in elderly, high risk cardiac patients and patients with prior use of anthracyclines. Randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of liposomal formulations with conventional anthracyclines. Our aim is to evaluate the adverse effects and quantify the relative safety profile of the liposomal and conventional anthracyclines through meta-analysis of the published randomized trials. METHODS: We conducted a broad search strategy of major electronic databases. We performed a meta- analysis of adverse effects on randomized controlled trials comparing liposomal formulation and conventional anthracyclines on different tumors. The primary outcome was the adverse effects including congestive heart failure (CHF), hematological toxicity, palmar-plantar erythrodysthesias (PPE), alopecia, nausea and vomiting. The odds ratios of the adverse effects were calculated separately and the overall odds ratio of the pooled data was calculated. RESULTS: We identified nine randomized controlled trials comparing liposomal formulations and conventional anthracyclines. The study included 2220 patients, of which1112 patients were treated with liposomal formulations and 1108 were treated with conventional anthracyclines. We found that the liposomal formulations have low incidence of CHF(OR 0.34, 95% CI, 0.24–0.47), alopecia (OR 0.0.25, 95% CI, 0.0.10-0.62), neutropenia (OR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.45- 0.85),(OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.71-1.125), and thrombocytopenia (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.61-1.25). The incidence of PPE was similar in both arms (OR 1.08, 95% CI, 0.11- 10.30). CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal doxorubicin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin demonstrated favorable toxicity profiles with better cardiac safety and less myelosuppression, alopecia, nausea and vomiting compared with the conventional anthracyclines. The better therapeutic index of liposomal anthracyclines without compromising the efficacy makes it a favorable choice over conventional anthracyclines in elderly patients, patients with risk factors for cardiac disease and patients with prior use of anthracyclines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3514106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35141062012-12-05 Comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis Rafiyath, Shamudheen M Rasul, Mohammad Lee, Byung Wei, Guoqing Lamba, Gurpreet Liu, Delong Exp Hematol Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Liposomal formulations of anthracyclines appear to have favorable toxicity profile when compared with conventional anthracyclines in elderly, high risk cardiac patients and patients with prior use of anthracyclines. Randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of liposomal formulations with conventional anthracyclines. Our aim is to evaluate the adverse effects and quantify the relative safety profile of the liposomal and conventional anthracyclines through meta-analysis of the published randomized trials. METHODS: We conducted a broad search strategy of major electronic databases. We performed a meta- analysis of adverse effects on randomized controlled trials comparing liposomal formulation and conventional anthracyclines on different tumors. The primary outcome was the adverse effects including congestive heart failure (CHF), hematological toxicity, palmar-plantar erythrodysthesias (PPE), alopecia, nausea and vomiting. The odds ratios of the adverse effects were calculated separately and the overall odds ratio of the pooled data was calculated. RESULTS: We identified nine randomized controlled trials comparing liposomal formulations and conventional anthracyclines. The study included 2220 patients, of which1112 patients were treated with liposomal formulations and 1108 were treated with conventional anthracyclines. We found that the liposomal formulations have low incidence of CHF(OR 0.34, 95% CI, 0.24–0.47), alopecia (OR 0.0.25, 95% CI, 0.0.10-0.62), neutropenia (OR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.45- 0.85),(OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.71-1.125), and thrombocytopenia (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.61-1.25). The incidence of PPE was similar in both arms (OR 1.08, 95% CI, 0.11- 10.30). CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal doxorubicin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin demonstrated favorable toxicity profiles with better cardiac safety and less myelosuppression, alopecia, nausea and vomiting compared with the conventional anthracyclines. The better therapeutic index of liposomal anthracyclines without compromising the efficacy makes it a favorable choice over conventional anthracyclines in elderly patients, patients with risk factors for cardiac disease and patients with prior use of anthracyclines. BioMed Central 2012-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3514106/ /pubmed/23210520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2162-3619-1-10 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rafiyath et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rafiyath, Shamudheen M
Rasul, Mohammad
Lee, Byung
Wei, Guoqing
Lamba, Gurpreet
Liu, Delong
Comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis
title Comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of safety and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin vs. conventional anthracyclines: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23210520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2162-3619-1-10
work_keys_str_mv AT rafiyathshamudheenm comparisonofsafetyandtoxicityofliposomaldoxorubicinvsconventionalanthracyclinesametaanalysis
AT rasulmohammad comparisonofsafetyandtoxicityofliposomaldoxorubicinvsconventionalanthracyclinesametaanalysis
AT leebyung comparisonofsafetyandtoxicityofliposomaldoxorubicinvsconventionalanthracyclinesametaanalysis
AT weiguoqing comparisonofsafetyandtoxicityofliposomaldoxorubicinvsconventionalanthracyclinesametaanalysis
AT lambagurpreet comparisonofsafetyandtoxicityofliposomaldoxorubicinvsconventionalanthracyclinesametaanalysis
AT liudelong comparisonofsafetyandtoxicityofliposomaldoxorubicinvsconventionalanthracyclinesametaanalysis