Cargando…

Evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis): Impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment

BACKGROUND: Cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis, are one of the most common ectoparasites infesting dogs and their environments. This study evaluated the efficacy of imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen (PPF) (Advantage® II for Dogs) and spinosad (Comfortis®) against established C. felis populations in dogs’ si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ross, Douglas H, Arther, Robert G, von Simson, Cristiano, Doyle, Veronica, Dryden, Michael W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22958307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-192
_version_ 1782251994219544576
author Ross, Douglas H
Arther, Robert G
von Simson, Cristiano
Doyle, Veronica
Dryden, Michael W
author_facet Ross, Douglas H
Arther, Robert G
von Simson, Cristiano
Doyle, Veronica
Dryden, Michael W
author_sort Ross, Douglas H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis, are one of the most common ectoparasites infesting dogs and their environments. This study evaluated the efficacy of imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen (PPF) (Advantage® II for Dogs) and spinosad (Comfortis®) against established C. felis populations in dogs’ simulated home environments. METHODS: Thirty Beagle dogs were randomly assigned to three groups of 10 dogs each and treated twice (Study Days 0 and 28) with imidacloprid + PPF, spinosad tablets, or a negative control (untreated). Dogs were housed individually in controlled simulated home environments capable of supporting the flea life cycle. Flea infestations were established in these environments by infesting each dog with 100 adult cat fleas on Study Days −21, -16 and 1. The impact of the treatments on fleas in the dogs’ environments were assessed by collecting floor mat samples from each simulated home environment, incubating them for 32 days, and counting the number of emerging adult fleas. On Study Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and 56, after collection of the cocoa matting samples, each dog was infested with an additional 5 ± 1 fleas to maintain the environmental infestations. Flea comb counts on dogs were conducted on Study Days 0 (pretreatment) and 63. RESULTS: From Study Days 7–28, flea infestations in the imidacloprid + PPF environments were significantly lower (p < 0.03) than those in the spinosad environments. Following the second treatment, flea infestations in all the imidacloprid + PPF environments fell to zero for the remainder of the study. In contrast, flea infestations persisted in some of the spinosad environments through the study’s end. On Study Day 63 all 10 dogs treated with imidacloprid + PPF were flea free, while only one of the 10 spinosad treated dogs was flea free. Flea counts on the other 9 spinosad treated dogs ranged from 3 to 46 fleas/dog (geometric mean = 8.6). A mean of 405 adult fleas/animal were recovered from the control dogs on Study Day 63. CONCLUSION: Flea infestations in environments of dogs treated with imidacloprid + PPF declined more rapidly than in those containing dogs treated with spinosad. Flea infestations were completely eliminated by Study Day 56 in environments of dogs treated with imidacloprid + PPF, but persisted through the study’s end in some of environments of dogs treated with spinosad.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3514229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35142292012-12-06 Evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis): Impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment Ross, Douglas H Arther, Robert G von Simson, Cristiano Doyle, Veronica Dryden, Michael W Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis, are one of the most common ectoparasites infesting dogs and their environments. This study evaluated the efficacy of imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen (PPF) (Advantage® II for Dogs) and spinosad (Comfortis®) against established C. felis populations in dogs’ simulated home environments. METHODS: Thirty Beagle dogs were randomly assigned to three groups of 10 dogs each and treated twice (Study Days 0 and 28) with imidacloprid + PPF, spinosad tablets, or a negative control (untreated). Dogs were housed individually in controlled simulated home environments capable of supporting the flea life cycle. Flea infestations were established in these environments by infesting each dog with 100 adult cat fleas on Study Days −21, -16 and 1. The impact of the treatments on fleas in the dogs’ environments were assessed by collecting floor mat samples from each simulated home environment, incubating them for 32 days, and counting the number of emerging adult fleas. On Study Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and 56, after collection of the cocoa matting samples, each dog was infested with an additional 5 ± 1 fleas to maintain the environmental infestations. Flea comb counts on dogs were conducted on Study Days 0 (pretreatment) and 63. RESULTS: From Study Days 7–28, flea infestations in the imidacloprid + PPF environments were significantly lower (p < 0.03) than those in the spinosad environments. Following the second treatment, flea infestations in all the imidacloprid + PPF environments fell to zero for the remainder of the study. In contrast, flea infestations persisted in some of the spinosad environments through the study’s end. On Study Day 63 all 10 dogs treated with imidacloprid + PPF were flea free, while only one of the 10 spinosad treated dogs was flea free. Flea counts on the other 9 spinosad treated dogs ranged from 3 to 46 fleas/dog (geometric mean = 8.6). A mean of 405 adult fleas/animal were recovered from the control dogs on Study Day 63. CONCLUSION: Flea infestations in environments of dogs treated with imidacloprid + PPF declined more rapidly than in those containing dogs treated with spinosad. Flea infestations were completely eliminated by Study Day 56 in environments of dogs treated with imidacloprid + PPF, but persisted through the study’s end in some of environments of dogs treated with spinosad. BioMed Central 2012-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3514229/ /pubmed/22958307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-192 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ross et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ross, Douglas H
Arther, Robert G
von Simson, Cristiano
Doyle, Veronica
Dryden, Michael W
Evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis): Impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment
title Evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis): Impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment
title_full Evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis): Impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment
title_fullStr Evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis): Impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis): Impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment
title_short Evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis): Impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy of topically administered imidacloprid + pyriproxyfen and orally administered spinosad against cat fleas (ctenocephalides felis): impact of treated dogs on flea life stages in a simulated home environment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22958307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-192
work_keys_str_mv AT rossdouglash evaluationoftheefficacyoftopicallyadministeredimidaclopridpyriproxyfenandorallyadministeredspinosadagainstcatfleasctenocephalidesfelisimpactoftreateddogsonflealifestagesinasimulatedhomeenvironment
AT artherrobertg evaluationoftheefficacyoftopicallyadministeredimidaclopridpyriproxyfenandorallyadministeredspinosadagainstcatfleasctenocephalidesfelisimpactoftreateddogsonflealifestagesinasimulatedhomeenvironment
AT vonsimsoncristiano evaluationoftheefficacyoftopicallyadministeredimidaclopridpyriproxyfenandorallyadministeredspinosadagainstcatfleasctenocephalidesfelisimpactoftreateddogsonflealifestagesinasimulatedhomeenvironment
AT doyleveronica evaluationoftheefficacyoftopicallyadministeredimidaclopridpyriproxyfenandorallyadministeredspinosadagainstcatfleasctenocephalidesfelisimpactoftreateddogsonflealifestagesinasimulatedhomeenvironment
AT drydenmichaelw evaluationoftheefficacyoftopicallyadministeredimidaclopridpyriproxyfenandorallyadministeredspinosadagainstcatfleasctenocephalidesfelisimpactoftreateddogsonflealifestagesinasimulatedhomeenvironment