Cargando…

Has Vietnam Health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor?

BACKGROUND: The elderly population is increasing in Vietnam. Access to health services for the elderly is often limited, especially for those in rural areas. User fees at public health care facilities and out-of-pocket payments for health care services are major barriers to access. With the aim of h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thanh, Nguyen Xuan, Lindholm, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22999637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-333
_version_ 1782251997267755008
author Thanh, Nguyen Xuan
Lindholm, Lars
author_facet Thanh, Nguyen Xuan
Lindholm, Lars
author_sort Thanh, Nguyen Xuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The elderly population is increasing in Vietnam. Access to health services for the elderly is often limited, especially for those in rural areas. User fees at public health care facilities and out-of-pocket payments for health care services are major barriers to access. With the aim of helping the poor access public health care services and reduce health care expenditures (HCE), the Health Care Funds for the Poor policy (HCFP) was implemented in 2002. The aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of this policy on elderly households. METHODS: Elderly households were defined as households which have at least one person aged 60 years or older. The impacts of HCFP on elderly household HCE as a percentage of total expenditure and health care utilization were assessed by a double-difference propensity score matching method using panel data of 3,957 elderly households in 2001, 2003, 2005 and 2007, of which 509 were classifies as “treated” (i.e. covered by the policy). Variables included in a logistic regression for estimating the propensity scores to match the treated with the control households, were household and household-head characteristics. RESULTS: In the first time period (2001–2003) there were no significant differences between treated and controls. This can be explained by the delay in implementing the policy by the local governments. In the second (2001–2005) and third period (2001–2007) the utilizations of Communal Health Stations (CHS) and go-to-pharmacies were significant. The treated were using CHS and pharmacies more between 2001 and 2007 while control households decreased their use. CONCLUSION: The main findings suggest HCFP met some goals but not all in the group of households having at least one elderly member. Utilization of CHS and pharmacies increased while the change in HCE as a proportion of total expenditures was not significant. To some extent, private health care and self-treatment are replaced by more utilization of CHS, indicating the poor elderly are better off. However, further efforts are needed to help them access higher levels of public health care (e.g. district health centers and provincial/central hospitals) and to reduce their HCE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3514242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35142422012-12-05 Has Vietnam Health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor? Thanh, Nguyen Xuan Lindholm, Lars BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The elderly population is increasing in Vietnam. Access to health services for the elderly is often limited, especially for those in rural areas. User fees at public health care facilities and out-of-pocket payments for health care services are major barriers to access. With the aim of helping the poor access public health care services and reduce health care expenditures (HCE), the Health Care Funds for the Poor policy (HCFP) was implemented in 2002. The aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of this policy on elderly households. METHODS: Elderly households were defined as households which have at least one person aged 60 years or older. The impacts of HCFP on elderly household HCE as a percentage of total expenditure and health care utilization were assessed by a double-difference propensity score matching method using panel data of 3,957 elderly households in 2001, 2003, 2005 and 2007, of which 509 were classifies as “treated” (i.e. covered by the policy). Variables included in a logistic regression for estimating the propensity scores to match the treated with the control households, were household and household-head characteristics. RESULTS: In the first time period (2001–2003) there were no significant differences between treated and controls. This can be explained by the delay in implementing the policy by the local governments. In the second (2001–2005) and third period (2001–2007) the utilizations of Communal Health Stations (CHS) and go-to-pharmacies were significant. The treated were using CHS and pharmacies more between 2001 and 2007 while control households decreased their use. CONCLUSION: The main findings suggest HCFP met some goals but not all in the group of households having at least one elderly member. Utilization of CHS and pharmacies increased while the change in HCE as a proportion of total expenditures was not significant. To some extent, private health care and self-treatment are replaced by more utilization of CHS, indicating the poor elderly are better off. However, further efforts are needed to help them access higher levels of public health care (e.g. district health centers and provincial/central hospitals) and to reduce their HCE. BioMed Central 2012-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3514242/ /pubmed/22999637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-333 Text en Copyright ©2012 Thanh and Lindholm; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thanh, Nguyen Xuan
Lindholm, Lars
Has Vietnam Health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor?
title Has Vietnam Health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor?
title_full Has Vietnam Health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor?
title_fullStr Has Vietnam Health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor?
title_full_unstemmed Has Vietnam Health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor?
title_short Has Vietnam Health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor?
title_sort has vietnam health care funds for the poor policy favored the elderly poor?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22999637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-333
work_keys_str_mv AT thanhnguyenxuan hasvietnamhealthcarefundsforthepoorpolicyfavoredtheelderlypoor
AT lindholmlars hasvietnamhealthcarefundsforthepoorpolicyfavoredtheelderlypoor