Cargando…
A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy
PURPOSE: The intraumbilical incision is being used more frequently, with increasing cases of single incision laparoscopic surgery. Since the umbilicus is deeper than the surrounding wall, it has abundant bacteria. No study has compared the adverse outcomes of periumbilical and intraumbilical incisio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23230554 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.83.6.360 |
_version_ | 1782252043317018624 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jun Suh Hong, Tae Ho Kim, Jun Gi |
author_facet | Lee, Jun Suh Hong, Tae Ho Kim, Jun Gi |
author_sort | Lee, Jun Suh |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The intraumbilical incision is being used more frequently, with increasing cases of single incision laparoscopic surgery. Since the umbilicus is deeper than the surrounding wall, it has abundant bacteria. No study has compared the adverse outcomes of periumbilical and intraumbilical incisions. We analyzed the wound complication rates of perforated appendicitis patients according to the types of umbilical incision. METHODS: A retrospective review was done of 280 patients with perforated appendicitis. One hundred fifty nine patients were treated with the intraumbilical incision, and 121 patients were treated with the periumbilical incision. We compared the perioperative outcomes according to each laparoscopic incision. RESULTS: There was no difference in operation time, postoperative hospital stay and analgesic requirement between the two groups. One case in the intraumbilical group (0.6%) and three cases in the periumbilical group (2.5%) developed wound infections. The umbilical complication rate showed no difference. CONCLUSION: The wound complication rate of intraumbilical and periumbilical incisions are not different. Although this retrospective study has inherent limitations, the intraumbilical incision seems to be a safe and feasible alternative for the periumbilical incision that can be easier to perform, with better cosmetic results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3514478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35144782012-12-10 A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy Lee, Jun Suh Hong, Tae Ho Kim, Jun Gi J Korean Surg Soc Original Article PURPOSE: The intraumbilical incision is being used more frequently, with increasing cases of single incision laparoscopic surgery. Since the umbilicus is deeper than the surrounding wall, it has abundant bacteria. No study has compared the adverse outcomes of periumbilical and intraumbilical incisions. We analyzed the wound complication rates of perforated appendicitis patients according to the types of umbilical incision. METHODS: A retrospective review was done of 280 patients with perforated appendicitis. One hundred fifty nine patients were treated with the intraumbilical incision, and 121 patients were treated with the periumbilical incision. We compared the perioperative outcomes according to each laparoscopic incision. RESULTS: There was no difference in operation time, postoperative hospital stay and analgesic requirement between the two groups. One case in the intraumbilical group (0.6%) and three cases in the periumbilical group (2.5%) developed wound infections. The umbilical complication rate showed no difference. CONCLUSION: The wound complication rate of intraumbilical and periumbilical incisions are not different. Although this retrospective study has inherent limitations, the intraumbilical incision seems to be a safe and feasible alternative for the periumbilical incision that can be easier to perform, with better cosmetic results. The Korean Surgical Society 2012-12 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3514478/ /pubmed/23230554 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.83.6.360 Text en Copyright © 2012, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Journal of the Korean Surgical Society is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Jun Suh Hong, Tae Ho Kim, Jun Gi A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy |
title | A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_full | A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_short | A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_sort | comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23230554 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.83.6.360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejunsuh acomparisonoftheperiumbilicalincisionandtheintraumbilicalincisioninlaparoscopicappendectomy AT hongtaeho acomparisonoftheperiumbilicalincisionandtheintraumbilicalincisioninlaparoscopicappendectomy AT kimjungi acomparisonoftheperiumbilicalincisionandtheintraumbilicalincisioninlaparoscopicappendectomy AT leejunsuh comparisonoftheperiumbilicalincisionandtheintraumbilicalincisioninlaparoscopicappendectomy AT hongtaeho comparisonoftheperiumbilicalincisionandtheintraumbilicalincisioninlaparoscopicappendectomy AT kimjungi comparisonoftheperiumbilicalincisionandtheintraumbilicalincisioninlaparoscopicappendectomy |