Cargando…
Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients
The bone mineral density (BMD) of retrieved cancellous bone samples is compared to the BMD measured in vivo in the respective osteoarthritic patients. Furthermore, mechanical properties, in terms of structural modulus (E (s)) and ultimate compression strength (σ (max)) of the bone samples, are corre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific World Journal
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/242403 |
_version_ | 1782252081293295616 |
---|---|
author | Haba, Yvonne Skripitz, Ralf Lindner, Tobias Köckerling, Martin Fritsche, Andreas Mittelmeier, Wolfram Bader, Rainer |
author_facet | Haba, Yvonne Skripitz, Ralf Lindner, Tobias Köckerling, Martin Fritsche, Andreas Mittelmeier, Wolfram Bader, Rainer |
author_sort | Haba, Yvonne |
collection | PubMed |
description | The bone mineral density (BMD) of retrieved cancellous bone samples is compared to the BMD measured in vivo in the respective osteoarthritic patients. Furthermore, mechanical properties, in terms of structural modulus (E (s)) and ultimate compression strength (σ (max)) of the bone samples, are correlated to BMD data. Human femoral heads were retrieved from 13 osteoarthritic patients undergoing total hip replacement. Subsequently, the BMD of each bone sample was analysed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as well as ashing. Furthermore, BMDs of the proximal femur were analysed preoperatively in the respective patients by DXA. BMDs of the femoral neck and head showed a wide variation, from 1016 ± 166 mg/cm(2) to 1376 ± 404 mg/cm(2). BMDs of the bone samples measured by DXA and ashing yielded values of 315 ± 199 mg/cm(2) and 347 ± 113 mg/cm(3), respectively. E (s) and σ (max) amounted to 232 ± 151 N/mm(2) and 6.4 ± 3.7 N/mm(2). Significant correlation was found between the DXA and ashing data on the bone samples and the DXA data from the patients at the femoral head (r = 0.85 and 0.79, resp.). E (s) correlated significantly with BMD in the patients and bone samples as well as the ashing data (r = 0.79, r = 0.82, and r = 0.8, resp.). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3514811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Scientific World Journal |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35148112012-12-07 Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients Haba, Yvonne Skripitz, Ralf Lindner, Tobias Köckerling, Martin Fritsche, Andreas Mittelmeier, Wolfram Bader, Rainer ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The bone mineral density (BMD) of retrieved cancellous bone samples is compared to the BMD measured in vivo in the respective osteoarthritic patients. Furthermore, mechanical properties, in terms of structural modulus (E (s)) and ultimate compression strength (σ (max)) of the bone samples, are correlated to BMD data. Human femoral heads were retrieved from 13 osteoarthritic patients undergoing total hip replacement. Subsequently, the BMD of each bone sample was analysed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as well as ashing. Furthermore, BMDs of the proximal femur were analysed preoperatively in the respective patients by DXA. BMDs of the femoral neck and head showed a wide variation, from 1016 ± 166 mg/cm(2) to 1376 ± 404 mg/cm(2). BMDs of the bone samples measured by DXA and ashing yielded values of 315 ± 199 mg/cm(2) and 347 ± 113 mg/cm(3), respectively. E (s) and σ (max) amounted to 232 ± 151 N/mm(2) and 6.4 ± 3.7 N/mm(2). Significant correlation was found between the DXA and ashing data on the bone samples and the DXA data from the patients at the femoral head (r = 0.85 and 0.79, resp.). E (s) correlated significantly with BMD in the patients and bone samples as well as the ashing data (r = 0.79, r = 0.82, and r = 0.8, resp.). The Scientific World Journal 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3514811/ /pubmed/23226981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/242403 Text en Copyright © 2012 Yvonne Haba et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Haba, Yvonne Skripitz, Ralf Lindner, Tobias Köckerling, Martin Fritsche, Andreas Mittelmeier, Wolfram Bader, Rainer Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients |
title | Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients |
title_full | Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients |
title_fullStr | Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients |
title_short | Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients |
title_sort | bone mineral densities and mechanical properties of retrieved femoral bone samples in relation to bone mineral densities measured in the respective patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/242403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habayvonne bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients AT skripitzralf bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients AT lindnertobias bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients AT kockerlingmartin bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients AT fritscheandreas bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients AT mittelmeierwolfram bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients AT baderrainer bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients |