Cargando…

Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients

The bone mineral density (BMD) of retrieved cancellous bone samples is compared to the BMD measured in vivo in the respective osteoarthritic patients. Furthermore, mechanical properties, in terms of structural modulus (E (s)) and ultimate compression strength (σ (max)) of the bone samples, are corre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haba, Yvonne, Skripitz, Ralf, Lindner, Tobias, Köckerling, Martin, Fritsche, Andreas, Mittelmeier, Wolfram, Bader, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/242403
_version_ 1782252081293295616
author Haba, Yvonne
Skripitz, Ralf
Lindner, Tobias
Köckerling, Martin
Fritsche, Andreas
Mittelmeier, Wolfram
Bader, Rainer
author_facet Haba, Yvonne
Skripitz, Ralf
Lindner, Tobias
Köckerling, Martin
Fritsche, Andreas
Mittelmeier, Wolfram
Bader, Rainer
author_sort Haba, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description The bone mineral density (BMD) of retrieved cancellous bone samples is compared to the BMD measured in vivo in the respective osteoarthritic patients. Furthermore, mechanical properties, in terms of structural modulus (E (s)) and ultimate compression strength (σ (max)) of the bone samples, are correlated to BMD data. Human femoral heads were retrieved from 13 osteoarthritic patients undergoing total hip replacement. Subsequently, the BMD of each bone sample was analysed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as well as ashing. Furthermore, BMDs of the proximal femur were analysed preoperatively in the respective patients by DXA. BMDs of the femoral neck and head showed a wide variation, from 1016 ± 166 mg/cm(2) to 1376 ± 404 mg/cm(2). BMDs of the bone samples measured by DXA and ashing yielded values of 315 ± 199 mg/cm(2) and 347 ± 113 mg/cm(3), respectively. E (s) and σ (max) amounted to 232 ± 151 N/mm(2) and 6.4 ± 3.7 N/mm(2). Significant correlation was found between the DXA and ashing data on the bone samples and the DXA data from the patients at the femoral head (r = 0.85 and 0.79, resp.). E (s) correlated significantly with BMD in the patients and bone samples as well as the ashing data (r = 0.79, r = 0.82, and r = 0.8, resp.).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3514811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35148112012-12-07 Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients Haba, Yvonne Skripitz, Ralf Lindner, Tobias Köckerling, Martin Fritsche, Andreas Mittelmeier, Wolfram Bader, Rainer ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The bone mineral density (BMD) of retrieved cancellous bone samples is compared to the BMD measured in vivo in the respective osteoarthritic patients. Furthermore, mechanical properties, in terms of structural modulus (E (s)) and ultimate compression strength (σ (max)) of the bone samples, are correlated to BMD data. Human femoral heads were retrieved from 13 osteoarthritic patients undergoing total hip replacement. Subsequently, the BMD of each bone sample was analysed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as well as ashing. Furthermore, BMDs of the proximal femur were analysed preoperatively in the respective patients by DXA. BMDs of the femoral neck and head showed a wide variation, from 1016 ± 166 mg/cm(2) to 1376 ± 404 mg/cm(2). BMDs of the bone samples measured by DXA and ashing yielded values of 315 ± 199 mg/cm(2) and 347 ± 113 mg/cm(3), respectively. E (s) and σ (max) amounted to 232 ± 151 N/mm(2) and 6.4 ± 3.7 N/mm(2). Significant correlation was found between the DXA and ashing data on the bone samples and the DXA data from the patients at the femoral head (r = 0.85 and 0.79, resp.). E (s) correlated significantly with BMD in the patients and bone samples as well as the ashing data (r = 0.79, r = 0.82, and r = 0.8, resp.). The Scientific World Journal 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3514811/ /pubmed/23226981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/242403 Text en Copyright © 2012 Yvonne Haba et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haba, Yvonne
Skripitz, Ralf
Lindner, Tobias
Köckerling, Martin
Fritsche, Andreas
Mittelmeier, Wolfram
Bader, Rainer
Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients
title Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients
title_full Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients
title_fullStr Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients
title_full_unstemmed Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients
title_short Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients
title_sort bone mineral densities and mechanical properties of retrieved femoral bone samples in relation to bone mineral densities measured in the respective patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/242403
work_keys_str_mv AT habayvonne bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients
AT skripitzralf bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients
AT lindnertobias bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients
AT kockerlingmartin bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients
AT fritscheandreas bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients
AT mittelmeierwolfram bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients
AT baderrainer bonemineraldensitiesandmechanicalpropertiesofretrievedfemoralbonesamplesinrelationtobonemineraldensitiesmeasuredintherespectivepatients