Cargando…
A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
BACKGROUND: The Provisional Diagnostic Instrument (PDI-4) is a brief, adult self-report instrument for 4 common psychiatric diagnoses in primary care patients: major depressive episode (MDE), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and bipolar I disorder...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23067304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-104 |
_version_ | 1782252185638141952 |
---|---|
author | Faries, Douglas E Houston, John P Sulcs, Ellen M Swindle, Ralph W |
author_facet | Faries, Douglas E Houston, John P Sulcs, Ellen M Swindle, Ralph W |
author_sort | Faries, Douglas E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Provisional Diagnostic Instrument (PDI-4) is a brief, adult self-report instrument for 4 common psychiatric diagnoses in primary care patients: major depressive episode (MDE), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and bipolar I disorder based on past or present mania. Our objective was to assess validity of the PDI-4 in a population independent of the study population originally used to develop the scale. METHODS: An online version of the 17-item PDI-4 was administered to 1,047 adults in the US; respondents also completed the PHQ-9, HADS-A, CAARS-S, and MDQ within the online survey. Respondents self-reported diagnosis by a healthcare professional with the terms depression (n=221), anxiety (n=218), attention deficit disorder (n=206), bipolar or manic depressive disorder (n=195), or none of these (n=207). Statistical analyses examined convergent and discriminant validity, and operating characteristics of the PDI-4 relative to the individual, validated, self-rated scales PHQ-9, HADS-A, CAARS-S, and MDQ, for each PDI-4 diagnosis. RESULTS: Convergent validity of the PDI-4 was supported by strong correlations with the corresponding individual scales (range of 0.63 [PDI-4 and MDQ] to 0.87 [PDI-4 and PHQ-9]). Operating characteristics of the PDI-4 were similar to results in the previous site-based study. The scale exhibited moderate sensitivities (0.52 [mania] to 0.70 [ADHD]) and strong specificities (0.86 [mania] to 0.92 [GAD]) using the individual scales as the gold standards. ANOVAs demonstrated that PDI-4 discriminated between subsets of patients defined by pre-specified severity level cutoff scores of the individual scales. However, overlapping symptoms and co-morbidities made differentiation between mental diagnoses much weaker than differentiation from the control group with none of the diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The PDI-4 appears to be a suitable, brief, self-rated tool for provisional diagnoses of common mental disorders. However, the high level of symptom overlap between these diagnoses emphasizes that such brief scales are not a replacement for thorough diagnostic evaluation by trained medical providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3515462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35154622012-12-06 A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4) Faries, Douglas E Houston, John P Sulcs, Ellen M Swindle, Ralph W BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The Provisional Diagnostic Instrument (PDI-4) is a brief, adult self-report instrument for 4 common psychiatric diagnoses in primary care patients: major depressive episode (MDE), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and bipolar I disorder based on past or present mania. Our objective was to assess validity of the PDI-4 in a population independent of the study population originally used to develop the scale. METHODS: An online version of the 17-item PDI-4 was administered to 1,047 adults in the US; respondents also completed the PHQ-9, HADS-A, CAARS-S, and MDQ within the online survey. Respondents self-reported diagnosis by a healthcare professional with the terms depression (n=221), anxiety (n=218), attention deficit disorder (n=206), bipolar or manic depressive disorder (n=195), or none of these (n=207). Statistical analyses examined convergent and discriminant validity, and operating characteristics of the PDI-4 relative to the individual, validated, self-rated scales PHQ-9, HADS-A, CAARS-S, and MDQ, for each PDI-4 diagnosis. RESULTS: Convergent validity of the PDI-4 was supported by strong correlations with the corresponding individual scales (range of 0.63 [PDI-4 and MDQ] to 0.87 [PDI-4 and PHQ-9]). Operating characteristics of the PDI-4 were similar to results in the previous site-based study. The scale exhibited moderate sensitivities (0.52 [mania] to 0.70 [ADHD]) and strong specificities (0.86 [mania] to 0.92 [GAD]) using the individual scales as the gold standards. ANOVAs demonstrated that PDI-4 discriminated between subsets of patients defined by pre-specified severity level cutoff scores of the individual scales. However, overlapping symptoms and co-morbidities made differentiation between mental diagnoses much weaker than differentiation from the control group with none of the diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The PDI-4 appears to be a suitable, brief, self-rated tool for provisional diagnoses of common mental disorders. However, the high level of symptom overlap between these diagnoses emphasizes that such brief scales are not a replacement for thorough diagnostic evaluation by trained medical providers. BioMed Central 2012-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3515462/ /pubmed/23067304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-104 Text en Copyright ©2012 Faries et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Faries, Douglas E Houston, John P Sulcs, Ellen M Swindle, Ralph W A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4) |
title | A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4) |
title_full | A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4) |
title_fullStr | A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4) |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4) |
title_short | A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4) |
title_sort | cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (pdi-4) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23067304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fariesdouglase acrossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4 AT houstonjohnp acrossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4 AT sulcsellenm acrossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4 AT swindleralphw acrossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4 AT fariesdouglase crossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4 AT houstonjohnp crossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4 AT sulcsellenm crossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4 AT swindleralphw crossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4 |