Cargando…

A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)

BACKGROUND: The Provisional Diagnostic Instrument (PDI-4) is a brief, adult self-report instrument for 4 common psychiatric diagnoses in primary care patients: major depressive episode (MDE), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and bipolar I disorder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faries, Douglas E, Houston, John P, Sulcs, Ellen M, Swindle, Ralph W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23067304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-104
_version_ 1782252185638141952
author Faries, Douglas E
Houston, John P
Sulcs, Ellen M
Swindle, Ralph W
author_facet Faries, Douglas E
Houston, John P
Sulcs, Ellen M
Swindle, Ralph W
author_sort Faries, Douglas E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Provisional Diagnostic Instrument (PDI-4) is a brief, adult self-report instrument for 4 common psychiatric diagnoses in primary care patients: major depressive episode (MDE), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and bipolar I disorder based on past or present mania. Our objective was to assess validity of the PDI-4 in a population independent of the study population originally used to develop the scale. METHODS: An online version of the 17-item PDI-4 was administered to 1,047 adults in the US; respondents also completed the PHQ-9, HADS-A, CAARS-S, and MDQ within the online survey. Respondents self-reported diagnosis by a healthcare professional with the terms depression (n=221), anxiety (n=218), attention deficit disorder (n=206), bipolar or manic depressive disorder (n=195), or none of these (n=207). Statistical analyses examined convergent and discriminant validity, and operating characteristics of the PDI-4 relative to the individual, validated, self-rated scales PHQ-9, HADS-A, CAARS-S, and MDQ, for each PDI-4 diagnosis. RESULTS: Convergent validity of the PDI-4 was supported by strong correlations with the corresponding individual scales (range of 0.63 [PDI-4 and MDQ] to 0.87 [PDI-4 and PHQ-9]). Operating characteristics of the PDI-4 were similar to results in the previous site-based study. The scale exhibited moderate sensitivities (0.52 [mania] to 0.70 [ADHD]) and strong specificities (0.86 [mania] to 0.92 [GAD]) using the individual scales as the gold standards. ANOVAs demonstrated that PDI-4 discriminated between subsets of patients defined by pre-specified severity level cutoff scores of the individual scales. However, overlapping symptoms and co-morbidities made differentiation between mental diagnoses much weaker than differentiation from the control group with none of the diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The PDI-4 appears to be a suitable, brief, self-rated tool for provisional diagnoses of common mental disorders. However, the high level of symptom overlap between these diagnoses emphasizes that such brief scales are not a replacement for thorough diagnostic evaluation by trained medical providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3515462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35154622012-12-06 A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4) Faries, Douglas E Houston, John P Sulcs, Ellen M Swindle, Ralph W BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The Provisional Diagnostic Instrument (PDI-4) is a brief, adult self-report instrument for 4 common psychiatric diagnoses in primary care patients: major depressive episode (MDE), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and bipolar I disorder based on past or present mania. Our objective was to assess validity of the PDI-4 in a population independent of the study population originally used to develop the scale. METHODS: An online version of the 17-item PDI-4 was administered to 1,047 adults in the US; respondents also completed the PHQ-9, HADS-A, CAARS-S, and MDQ within the online survey. Respondents self-reported diagnosis by a healthcare professional with the terms depression (n=221), anxiety (n=218), attention deficit disorder (n=206), bipolar or manic depressive disorder (n=195), or none of these (n=207). Statistical analyses examined convergent and discriminant validity, and operating characteristics of the PDI-4 relative to the individual, validated, self-rated scales PHQ-9, HADS-A, CAARS-S, and MDQ, for each PDI-4 diagnosis. RESULTS: Convergent validity of the PDI-4 was supported by strong correlations with the corresponding individual scales (range of 0.63 [PDI-4 and MDQ] to 0.87 [PDI-4 and PHQ-9]). Operating characteristics of the PDI-4 were similar to results in the previous site-based study. The scale exhibited moderate sensitivities (0.52 [mania] to 0.70 [ADHD]) and strong specificities (0.86 [mania] to 0.92 [GAD]) using the individual scales as the gold standards. ANOVAs demonstrated that PDI-4 discriminated between subsets of patients defined by pre-specified severity level cutoff scores of the individual scales. However, overlapping symptoms and co-morbidities made differentiation between mental diagnoses much weaker than differentiation from the control group with none of the diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The PDI-4 appears to be a suitable, brief, self-rated tool for provisional diagnoses of common mental disorders. However, the high level of symptom overlap between these diagnoses emphasizes that such brief scales are not a replacement for thorough diagnostic evaluation by trained medical providers. BioMed Central 2012-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3515462/ /pubmed/23067304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-104 Text en Copyright ©2012 Faries et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Faries, Douglas E
Houston, John P
Sulcs, Ellen M
Swindle, Ralph W
A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
title A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
title_full A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
title_fullStr A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
title_full_unstemmed A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
title_short A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
title_sort cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (pdi-4)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23067304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-104
work_keys_str_mv AT fariesdouglase acrossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4
AT houstonjohnp acrossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4
AT sulcsellenm acrossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4
AT swindleralphw acrossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4
AT fariesdouglase crossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4
AT houstonjohnp crossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4
AT sulcsellenm crossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4
AT swindleralphw crossvalidationoftheprovisionaldiagnosticinstrumentpdi4