Cargando…

Workers’ Compensation Status: Does It Affect Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Previous reviews have demonstrated that patient outcomes following orthopaedic surgery are strongly influenced by the presence of Workers’ Compensation. However, the variability in the reviews’ methodology may have inflated the estimated strength of this association. The main objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe, Godin, Katelyn, Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara, Faloppa, Flávio, Bhandari, Mohit, Belloti, João Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23227160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050251
_version_ 1782252207256633344
author de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe
Godin, Katelyn
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara
Faloppa, Flávio
Bhandari, Mohit
Belloti, João Carlos
author_facet de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe
Godin, Katelyn
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara
Faloppa, Flávio
Bhandari, Mohit
Belloti, João Carlos
author_sort de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Previous reviews have demonstrated that patient outcomes following orthopaedic surgery are strongly influenced by the presence of Workers’ Compensation. However, the variability in the reviews’ methodology may have inflated the estimated strength of this association. The main objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the influence of Workers’ Compensation on the outcomes of orthopaedic surgical procedures. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the literature published in this area from 1992–2012, with no language restrictions. The following databases were used MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Google Scholar, LILACS and Pubmed. We also hand-searched the reference sections of all selected papers. We included all prospective studies evaluating the effect of compensation status on outcomes in adult patients who had undergone surgery due to orthopaedic conditions or diseases. Outcomes of interest included disease specific, region specific and/or overall quality of life scales/questionnaires and surgeons’ personal judgment of the results. We used an assessment tool to appraise the quality of all included studies. We used Review Manager to create forest plots to summarize study data and funnel plots for the assessment of publication bias. RESULTS: Twenty studies met our eligibility criteria. The overall risk ratio for experiencing an unsatisfactory result after orthopaedic surgery for patients with compensation compared to non-compensated patients is 2.08 (95% CI 1.54–2.82). A similar association was shown for continuous data extracted from the studies using assessment scales or questionnaires (Standard Mean Difference = −0.70 95% CI -0.97- −0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who undergo orthopaedic surgical procedures, those receiving Workers’ Compensation experience a two-fold greater risk of a negative outcome. Our findings show a considerably lower estimate of risk compared to previous reviews that include retrospective data. Further research is warranted to determine the etiological explanation for the influence of compensation status on patient outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42012002121
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3515555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35155552012-12-07 Workers’ Compensation Status: Does It Affect Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe Godin, Katelyn Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara Faloppa, Flávio Bhandari, Mohit Belloti, João Carlos PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Previous reviews have demonstrated that patient outcomes following orthopaedic surgery are strongly influenced by the presence of Workers’ Compensation. However, the variability in the reviews’ methodology may have inflated the estimated strength of this association. The main objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the influence of Workers’ Compensation on the outcomes of orthopaedic surgical procedures. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the literature published in this area from 1992–2012, with no language restrictions. The following databases were used MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Google Scholar, LILACS and Pubmed. We also hand-searched the reference sections of all selected papers. We included all prospective studies evaluating the effect of compensation status on outcomes in adult patients who had undergone surgery due to orthopaedic conditions or diseases. Outcomes of interest included disease specific, region specific and/or overall quality of life scales/questionnaires and surgeons’ personal judgment of the results. We used an assessment tool to appraise the quality of all included studies. We used Review Manager to create forest plots to summarize study data and funnel plots for the assessment of publication bias. RESULTS: Twenty studies met our eligibility criteria. The overall risk ratio for experiencing an unsatisfactory result after orthopaedic surgery for patients with compensation compared to non-compensated patients is 2.08 (95% CI 1.54–2.82). A similar association was shown for continuous data extracted from the studies using assessment scales or questionnaires (Standard Mean Difference = −0.70 95% CI -0.97- −0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who undergo orthopaedic surgical procedures, those receiving Workers’ Compensation experience a two-fold greater risk of a negative outcome. Our findings show a considerably lower estimate of risk compared to previous reviews that include retrospective data. Further research is warranted to determine the etiological explanation for the influence of compensation status on patient outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42012002121 Public Library of Science 2012-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3515555/ /pubmed/23227160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050251 Text en © 2012 de Moraes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe
Godin, Katelyn
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara
Faloppa, Flávio
Bhandari, Mohit
Belloti, João Carlos
Workers’ Compensation Status: Does It Affect Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis
title Workers’ Compensation Status: Does It Affect Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis
title_full Workers’ Compensation Status: Does It Affect Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Workers’ Compensation Status: Does It Affect Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Workers’ Compensation Status: Does It Affect Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis
title_short Workers’ Compensation Status: Does It Affect Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis
title_sort workers’ compensation status: does it affect orthopaedic surgery outcomes? a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23227160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050251
work_keys_str_mv AT demoraesviniciusynoe workerscompensationstatusdoesitaffectorthopaedicsurgeryoutcomesametaanalysis
AT godinkatelyn workerscompensationstatusdoesitaffectorthopaedicsurgeryoutcomesametaanalysis
AT tamaokimarceljunsugawara workerscompensationstatusdoesitaffectorthopaedicsurgeryoutcomesametaanalysis
AT faloppaflavio workerscompensationstatusdoesitaffectorthopaedicsurgeryoutcomesametaanalysis
AT bhandarimohit workerscompensationstatusdoesitaffectorthopaedicsurgeryoutcomesametaanalysis
AT bellotijoaocarlos workerscompensationstatusdoesitaffectorthopaedicsurgeryoutcomesametaanalysis