Cargando…

Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect

The aims of this systematic literature review were to assess whether the detection of pubovisceral avulsions using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or perineal ultrasonography was clinically relevant in women with pelvic floor dysfunction and to evaluate the relation with anatomy, symptoms, and recur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lammers, Karin, Fütterer, Jurgen J., Prokop, Mathias, Vierhout, Mark E., Kluivers, Kirsten B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22581241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1805-0
_version_ 1782252227219423232
author Lammers, Karin
Fütterer, Jurgen J.
Prokop, Mathias
Vierhout, Mark E.
Kluivers, Kirsten B.
author_facet Lammers, Karin
Fütterer, Jurgen J.
Prokop, Mathias
Vierhout, Mark E.
Kluivers, Kirsten B.
author_sort Lammers, Karin
collection PubMed
description The aims of this systematic literature review were to assess whether the detection of pubovisceral avulsions using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or perineal ultrasonography was clinically relevant in women with pelvic floor dysfunction and to evaluate the relation with anatomy, symptoms, and recurrence after surgery. We performed a systematic literature review using three bibliographical databases (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL) as data sources. Clinical studies were included in which pubovisceral avulsions were studied in relation to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage, pelvic floor symptoms, and/or recurrence of POP after surgery. Ultimately, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. POP stage and recurrence of POP after surgery were strongly associated with pubovisceral avulsions. Contradictory results were found regarding the relation between pubovisceral avulsions and urinary symptoms and symptoms of anorectal dysfunction. Pubovisceral avulsions, as diagnosed by MR imaging or perineal ultrasonography, are associated with higher stages of POP and recurrence of POP after surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3515771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35157712012-12-06 Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect Lammers, Karin Fütterer, Jurgen J. Prokop, Mathias Vierhout, Mark E. Kluivers, Kirsten B. Int Urogynecol J Review Article The aims of this systematic literature review were to assess whether the detection of pubovisceral avulsions using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or perineal ultrasonography was clinically relevant in women with pelvic floor dysfunction and to evaluate the relation with anatomy, symptoms, and recurrence after surgery. We performed a systematic literature review using three bibliographical databases (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL) as data sources. Clinical studies were included in which pubovisceral avulsions were studied in relation to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage, pelvic floor symptoms, and/or recurrence of POP after surgery. Ultimately, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. POP stage and recurrence of POP after surgery were strongly associated with pubovisceral avulsions. Contradictory results were found regarding the relation between pubovisceral avulsions and urinary symptoms and symptoms of anorectal dysfunction. Pubovisceral avulsions, as diagnosed by MR imaging or perineal ultrasonography, are associated with higher stages of POP and recurrence of POP after surgery. Springer-Verlag 2012-05-12 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3515771/ /pubmed/22581241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1805-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lammers, Karin
Fütterer, Jurgen J.
Prokop, Mathias
Vierhout, Mark E.
Kluivers, Kirsten B.
Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect
title Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect
title_full Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect
title_fullStr Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect
title_short Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect
title_sort diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22581241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1805-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lammerskarin diagnosingpubovisceralavulsionsasystematicreviewoftheclinicalrelevanceofaprevalentanatomicaldefect
AT futtererjurgenj diagnosingpubovisceralavulsionsasystematicreviewoftheclinicalrelevanceofaprevalentanatomicaldefect
AT prokopmathias diagnosingpubovisceralavulsionsasystematicreviewoftheclinicalrelevanceofaprevalentanatomicaldefect
AT vierhoutmarke diagnosingpubovisceralavulsionsasystematicreviewoftheclinicalrelevanceofaprevalentanatomicaldefect
AT kluiverskirstenb diagnosingpubovisceralavulsionsasystematicreviewoftheclinicalrelevanceofaprevalentanatomicaldefect