Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of RAGE Gene Polymorphism and Coronary Heart Disease Risk

BACKGROUND: Recent data from human and animal studies have shown an upregulated expression of advanced glycosylation end product–specific receptor (RAGE) in human atherosclerotic plaques 1 and in retina, messangial, and aortic vessels, suggesting an important role of RAGE in the pathogenesis of athe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jun, Zou, Lianjiang, Song, Zhigang, Lang, Xilong, Huang, Shengdong, Lu, Fanglin, Han, Lin, Xu, Zhiyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050790
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Recent data from human and animal studies have shown an upregulated expression of advanced glycosylation end product–specific receptor (RAGE) in human atherosclerotic plaques 1 and in retina, messangial, and aortic vessels, suggesting an important role of RAGE in the pathogenesis of atherothrombotic diseases. In the past few years, the relationship between RAGE polymorphisms (−429T/C, −374T/A, and G82S) and coronary heart disease (CHD) has been reported in various ethnic groups; however, these studies have yielded contradictory results. METHODS: PubMed, ISI web of science, EMBASE and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Data were abstracted independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between RAGE polymorphisms and susceptibility to CHD. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies including 4343 patients and 5402 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant results were observed for −429T/C (OR  = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.92–1.12, P  = 0.78), −374T/A (OR  = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.98–1.26, P  = 0.09) and G82S (OR  = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.86–1.45, P  = 0.41) polymorphism. In the stratified analyses according to ethnicity, sample size, CHD endpoint and Hardy-Weinberg status, no evidence of any gene-disease association was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that there is no association between the RAGE −429T/C, −374T/A and G82S polymorphisms and CHD.