Cargando…

Analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality

BACKGROUND: It has been a challenge to determine breast cancer clonality accurately. The aim of the present study was to assess methods using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue to differentiate new primary tumours from true recurrences that are associated with poorer prognoses and often...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masuda, S, Kadowaki, T, Kumaki, N, Tang, X, Tokuda, Y, Yoshimura, S, Takekoshi, S, Osamura, R Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23169290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.505
_version_ 1782252335237431296
author Masuda, S
Kadowaki, T
Kumaki, N
Tang, X
Tokuda, Y
Yoshimura, S
Takekoshi, S
Osamura, R Y
author_facet Masuda, S
Kadowaki, T
Kumaki, N
Tang, X
Tokuda, Y
Yoshimura, S
Takekoshi, S
Osamura, R Y
author_sort Masuda, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been a challenge to determine breast cancer clonality accurately. The aim of the present study was to assess methods using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue to differentiate new primary tumours from true recurrences that are associated with poorer prognoses and often require more aggressive treatment. METHODS: We investigated the novel method of analysing gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop region (GAMDDL) and compared it with the conventional method of analysing the X-chromosome-linked human androgen receptor (HUMARA). The FFPE sections of primary and secondary breast cancers, the non-neoplastic mammary gland, and lymph nodes were examined. RESULTS: Informative rates for HUMARA, GAMDDL, and combined analyses were 42.1%, 76.9%, and 89.5%, respectively. All of the 10 contralateral breast cancers were determined to be non-clonal. In contrast, 3 out of 8 (37.5%) of the ipsilateral secondary tumours shared a clonal origin with the primary tumour and were classified as true recurrences, whereas 4 out of 8 (50%) were classified as new primary tumours. CONCLUSION: GAMDDL analysis represents a novel and useful molecular method for examining the precise cell lineages of primary and secondary tumours, and was more accurate than HUMARA in determining clonality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3516690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35166902013-12-04 Analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality Masuda, S Kadowaki, T Kumaki, N Tang, X Tokuda, Y Yoshimura, S Takekoshi, S Osamura, R Y Br J Cancer Genetics & Genomics BACKGROUND: It has been a challenge to determine breast cancer clonality accurately. The aim of the present study was to assess methods using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue to differentiate new primary tumours from true recurrences that are associated with poorer prognoses and often require more aggressive treatment. METHODS: We investigated the novel method of analysing gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop region (GAMDDL) and compared it with the conventional method of analysing the X-chromosome-linked human androgen receptor (HUMARA). The FFPE sections of primary and secondary breast cancers, the non-neoplastic mammary gland, and lymph nodes were examined. RESULTS: Informative rates for HUMARA, GAMDDL, and combined analyses were 42.1%, 76.9%, and 89.5%, respectively. All of the 10 contralateral breast cancers were determined to be non-clonal. In contrast, 3 out of 8 (37.5%) of the ipsilateral secondary tumours shared a clonal origin with the primary tumour and were classified as true recurrences, whereas 4 out of 8 (50%) were classified as new primary tumours. CONCLUSION: GAMDDL analysis represents a novel and useful molecular method for examining the precise cell lineages of primary and secondary tumours, and was more accurate than HUMARA in determining clonality. Nature Publishing Group 2012-12-04 2012-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3516690/ /pubmed/23169290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.505 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Genetics & Genomics
Masuda, S
Kadowaki, T
Kumaki, N
Tang, X
Tokuda, Y
Yoshimura, S
Takekoshi, S
Osamura, R Y
Analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality
title Analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality
title_full Analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality
title_fullStr Analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality
title_short Analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial DNA D-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality
title_sort analysis of gene alterations of mitochondrial dna d-loop regions to determine breast cancer clonality
topic Genetics & Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23169290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.505
work_keys_str_mv AT masudas analysisofgenealterationsofmitochondrialdnadloopregionstodeterminebreastcancerclonality
AT kadowakit analysisofgenealterationsofmitochondrialdnadloopregionstodeterminebreastcancerclonality
AT kumakin analysisofgenealterationsofmitochondrialdnadloopregionstodeterminebreastcancerclonality
AT tangx analysisofgenealterationsofmitochondrialdnadloopregionstodeterminebreastcancerclonality
AT tokuday analysisofgenealterationsofmitochondrialdnadloopregionstodeterminebreastcancerclonality
AT yoshimuras analysisofgenealterationsofmitochondrialdnadloopregionstodeterminebreastcancerclonality
AT takekoshis analysisofgenealterationsofmitochondrialdnadloopregionstodeterminebreastcancerclonality
AT osamurary analysisofgenealterationsofmitochondrialdnadloopregionstodeterminebreastcancerclonality