Cargando…

Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: Factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised

Background: The Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (IPQ-R) is commonly used to measure illness perceptions. We tested whether the structure of the IPQ-R was appropriate for use with primary care musculoskeletal pain patients. Methods: Confirmatory (C) and exploratory (E) factor analyses (FA)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholls, Elaine E., Hill, Susan, Foster, Nadine E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.714782
_version_ 1782252346023084032
author Nicholls, Elaine E.
Hill, Susan
Foster, Nadine E.
author_facet Nicholls, Elaine E.
Hill, Susan
Foster, Nadine E.
author_sort Nicholls, Elaine E.
collection PubMed
description Background: The Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (IPQ-R) is commonly used to measure illness perceptions. We tested whether the structure of the IPQ-R was appropriate for use with primary care musculoskeletal pain patients. Methods: Confirmatory (C) and exploratory (E) factor analyses (FA) were used to test whether the structure of the IPQ-R was supported for patients with knee pain (n = 393), hand pain (n = 2113) and back pain (n = 1591). CFA was used to test whether the timeline acute/chronic, timeline cyclical, consequences, personal control, treatment control, illness coherence and emotional representation dimensions of the IPQ-R were distinct; EFA was used to explore potential structure for patients’ views on the cause of their condition. Results: Goodness-of-fit indices for the CFA were below our criteria for good model fit. Removal of six items from the model improved model fit, but our criteria for good model fit was still not achieved. An interpretable factor solution could not be determined for the causal items on the questionnaire. Conclusions: Our data show limited evidence that the seven dimensions of the IPQ-R are distinct. A clear structure for the causal items was not determined. Further work is needed to develop the IPQ-R for use with primary care musculoskeletal pain patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3516816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35168162012-12-10 Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: Factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised Nicholls, Elaine E. Hill, Susan Foster, Nadine E. Psychol Health Research Article Background: The Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (IPQ-R) is commonly used to measure illness perceptions. We tested whether the structure of the IPQ-R was appropriate for use with primary care musculoskeletal pain patients. Methods: Confirmatory (C) and exploratory (E) factor analyses (FA) were used to test whether the structure of the IPQ-R was supported for patients with knee pain (n = 393), hand pain (n = 2113) and back pain (n = 1591). CFA was used to test whether the timeline acute/chronic, timeline cyclical, consequences, personal control, treatment control, illness coherence and emotional representation dimensions of the IPQ-R were distinct; EFA was used to explore potential structure for patients’ views on the cause of their condition. Results: Goodness-of-fit indices for the CFA were below our criteria for good model fit. Removal of six items from the model improved model fit, but our criteria for good model fit was still not achieved. An interpretable factor solution could not be determined for the causal items on the questionnaire. Conclusions: Our data show limited evidence that the seven dimensions of the IPQ-R are distinct. A clear structure for the causal items was not determined. Further work is needed to develop the IPQ-R for use with primary care musculoskeletal pain patients. Taylor & Francis 2012-08-15 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3516816/ /pubmed/22891727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.714782 Text en © 2013 Taylor & Francis http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nicholls, Elaine E.
Hill, Susan
Foster, Nadine E.
Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: Factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised
title Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: Factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised
title_full Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: Factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised
title_fullStr Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: Factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised
title_full_unstemmed Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: Factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised
title_short Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: Factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised
title_sort musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: factor structure of the illness perceptions questionnaire-revised
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22891727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.714782
work_keys_str_mv AT nichollselainee musculoskeletalpainillnessperceptionsfactorstructureoftheillnessperceptionsquestionnairerevised
AT hillsusan musculoskeletalpainillnessperceptionsfactorstructureoftheillnessperceptionsquestionnairerevised
AT fosternadinee musculoskeletalpainillnessperceptionsfactorstructureoftheillnessperceptionsquestionnairerevised