Cargando…

Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report

INTRODUCTION: The Lichtenstein technique is currently considered the “gold standard” of open, anterior inguinal hernia repair. It is not free, however, of adverse effects, which may be caused by the implemented synthetic material. AIM: Determination the influence of the mesh employed on treatment re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pielaciński, Konrad, Szczepanik, Andrzej B., Misiak, Andrzej, Wróblewski, Tadeusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23255981
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.26253
_version_ 1782252360691613696
author Pielaciński, Konrad
Szczepanik, Andrzej B.
Misiak, Andrzej
Wróblewski, Tadeusz
author_facet Pielaciński, Konrad
Szczepanik, Andrzej B.
Misiak, Andrzej
Wróblewski, Tadeusz
author_sort Pielaciński, Konrad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Lichtenstein technique is currently considered the “gold standard” of open, anterior inguinal hernia repair. It is not free, however, of adverse effects, which may be caused by the implemented synthetic material. AIM: Determination the influence of the mesh employed on treatment results including immediate complications, return to everyday activities, chronic pain occurrence and hernia recurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tension-free hernia repair using the Lichtenstein technique was performed in all the 59 patients randomized to trial groups. Group P with heavyweight polypropylene mesh contained 34 patients; group V with lightweight, partially absorbable mesh (polypropylene/polyglactin 910) consisted of 25 people. Controlled, scheduled follow-up appointments took place after the 7(th) day and the 3(rd) and 6(th) month. Patients were clinically assessed and pain intensity was determined on an analogue-visual scale. RESULTS: No statistically significant influence of the type of mesh on the risk of early complications, severe pain intensity, the length of hospital stay, time of recovery, or patients’ satisfaction with treatment was observed. After 6 months also no statistically significant differences were observed between groups with regard to recurrence rate (P 3.4% vs. V 4.0%), chronic pain (P 5.9% vs. V 4.0%) and ailments such as “foreign body presence” (V vs. P, OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.077-1.219, p = 0.093) incidence, although their probability was 70% lower for V mesh. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results confirm the effectiveness of the Lichtenstein technique for hernia repair with both types of meshes. It appears that use of a partially absorbable mesh is connected with lower risk of postoperative complications, but the final results require multicentre trials in a larger series of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3516947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35169472012-12-19 Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report Pielaciński, Konrad Szczepanik, Andrzej B. Misiak, Andrzej Wróblewski, Tadeusz Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The Lichtenstein technique is currently considered the “gold standard” of open, anterior inguinal hernia repair. It is not free, however, of adverse effects, which may be caused by the implemented synthetic material. AIM: Determination the influence of the mesh employed on treatment results including immediate complications, return to everyday activities, chronic pain occurrence and hernia recurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tension-free hernia repair using the Lichtenstein technique was performed in all the 59 patients randomized to trial groups. Group P with heavyweight polypropylene mesh contained 34 patients; group V with lightweight, partially absorbable mesh (polypropylene/polyglactin 910) consisted of 25 people. Controlled, scheduled follow-up appointments took place after the 7(th) day and the 3(rd) and 6(th) month. Patients were clinically assessed and pain intensity was determined on an analogue-visual scale. RESULTS: No statistically significant influence of the type of mesh on the risk of early complications, severe pain intensity, the length of hospital stay, time of recovery, or patients’ satisfaction with treatment was observed. After 6 months also no statistically significant differences were observed between groups with regard to recurrence rate (P 3.4% vs. V 4.0%), chronic pain (P 5.9% vs. V 4.0%) and ailments such as “foreign body presence” (V vs. P, OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.077-1.219, p = 0.093) incidence, although their probability was 70% lower for V mesh. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results confirm the effectiveness of the Lichtenstein technique for hernia repair with both types of meshes. It appears that use of a partially absorbable mesh is connected with lower risk of postoperative complications, but the final results require multicentre trials in a larger series of patients. Termedia Publishing House 2011-12-20 2011-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3516947/ /pubmed/23255981 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.26253 Text en Copyright © 2011 Sekcja Wideochirurgii TChP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pielaciński, Konrad
Szczepanik, Andrzej B.
Misiak, Andrzej
Wróblewski, Tadeusz
Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report
title Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report
title_full Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report
title_fullStr Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report
title_full_unstemmed Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report
title_short Randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with Lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. Preliminary report
title_sort randomized clinical trial comparing inguinal hernia repair with lichtenstein technique using non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh. preliminary report
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23255981
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.26253
work_keys_str_mv AT pielacinskikonrad randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinginguinalherniarepairwithlichtensteintechniqueusingnonabsorbableorpartiallyabsorbablemeshpreliminaryreport
AT szczepanikandrzejb randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinginguinalherniarepairwithlichtensteintechniqueusingnonabsorbableorpartiallyabsorbablemeshpreliminaryreport
AT misiakandrzej randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinginguinalherniarepairwithlichtensteintechniqueusingnonabsorbableorpartiallyabsorbablemeshpreliminaryreport
AT wroblewskitadeusz randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinginguinalherniarepairwithlichtensteintechniqueusingnonabsorbableorpartiallyabsorbablemeshpreliminaryreport