Cargando…

After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care

BACKGROUND: This study explores with patients, carers and health care professionals if, when and how Advance Care Planning conversations about patients’ preferences for place of care (and death) were facilitated and documented. METHODS: The study adopted an exploratory case study design using qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almack, Kathryn, Cox, Karen, Moghaddam, Nima, Pollock, Kristian, Seymour, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-11-15
_version_ 1782252382807130112
author Almack, Kathryn
Cox, Karen
Moghaddam, Nima
Pollock, Kristian
Seymour, Jane
author_facet Almack, Kathryn
Cox, Karen
Moghaddam, Nima
Pollock, Kristian
Seymour, Jane
author_sort Almack, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study explores with patients, carers and health care professionals if, when and how Advance Care Planning conversations about patients’ preferences for place of care (and death) were facilitated and documented. METHODS: The study adopted an exploratory case study design using qualitative interviews, across five services delivering palliative care to cancer and non-cancer patients within an urban and rural English region. The study recruited 18 cases made up of patients (N = 18; 10 men; 8 women; median age 75); nominated relatives (N = 11; 7 women; 4 men; median age 65) and healthcare professionals (N = 15) caring for the patient. Data collection included: 18 initial interviews (nine separate interviews with patients and 9 joint interviews with patients and relatives) and follow up interviews in 6 cases (involving a total of 5 patients and 5 relatives) within one year of the first interview. Five group interviews were conducted with 15 healthcare professionals; 8 of whom also participated in follow up interviews to review their involvement with patients in our study. RESULTS: Patients demonstrated varying degrees of reticence, evasion or reluctance to initiate any conversations about end of life care preferences. Most assumed that staff would initiate such conversations, while staff were often hesitant to do so. Staff-identified barriers included the perceived risks of taking away hope and issues of timing. Staff were often guided by cues from the patient or by intuition about when to initiate these discussions. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the complexities surrounding the initiation of Advance Care Planning involving conversations about end of life care preferences with patients who are identified as having palliative care needs, in particular in relation to the risks inherent in the process of having conversations where mortality must be acknowledged. Future research is needed to examine how to develop interventions to help initiate conversations to develop person centred plans to manage the end of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3517317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35173172012-12-08 After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care Almack, Kathryn Cox, Karen Moghaddam, Nima Pollock, Kristian Seymour, Jane BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: This study explores with patients, carers and health care professionals if, when and how Advance Care Planning conversations about patients’ preferences for place of care (and death) were facilitated and documented. METHODS: The study adopted an exploratory case study design using qualitative interviews, across five services delivering palliative care to cancer and non-cancer patients within an urban and rural English region. The study recruited 18 cases made up of patients (N = 18; 10 men; 8 women; median age 75); nominated relatives (N = 11; 7 women; 4 men; median age 65) and healthcare professionals (N = 15) caring for the patient. Data collection included: 18 initial interviews (nine separate interviews with patients and 9 joint interviews with patients and relatives) and follow up interviews in 6 cases (involving a total of 5 patients and 5 relatives) within one year of the first interview. Five group interviews were conducted with 15 healthcare professionals; 8 of whom also participated in follow up interviews to review their involvement with patients in our study. RESULTS: Patients demonstrated varying degrees of reticence, evasion or reluctance to initiate any conversations about end of life care preferences. Most assumed that staff would initiate such conversations, while staff were often hesitant to do so. Staff-identified barriers included the perceived risks of taking away hope and issues of timing. Staff were often guided by cues from the patient or by intuition about when to initiate these discussions. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the complexities surrounding the initiation of Advance Care Planning involving conversations about end of life care preferences with patients who are identified as having palliative care needs, in particular in relation to the risks inherent in the process of having conversations where mortality must be acknowledged. Future research is needed to examine how to develop interventions to help initiate conversations to develop person centred plans to manage the end of life. BioMed Central 2012-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3517317/ /pubmed/22985010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-11-15 Text en Copyright ©2012 Almack et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Almack, Kathryn
Cox, Karen
Moghaddam, Nima
Pollock, Kristian
Seymour, Jane
After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care
title After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care
title_full After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care
title_fullStr After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care
title_full_unstemmed After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care
title_short After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care
title_sort after you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-11-15
work_keys_str_mv AT almackkathryn afteryouconversationsbetweenpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsinplanningforendoflifecare
AT coxkaren afteryouconversationsbetweenpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsinplanningforendoflifecare
AT moghaddamnima afteryouconversationsbetweenpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsinplanningforendoflifecare
AT pollockkristian afteryouconversationsbetweenpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsinplanningforendoflifecare
AT seymourjane afteryouconversationsbetweenpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsinplanningforendoflifecare