Cargando…

Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AFib) exists more frequently in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) than in patients without, and AFib may be a sign of progressive deterioration of AS. Echocardiographic assessment of AS in sinus rhythm is well documented, however, little is known about AFib in AS si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burup Kristensen, Charlotte, Jensen, Jan Skov, Sogaard, Peter, Carstensen, Helle Gervig, Mogelvang, Rasmus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23006976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-10-38
_version_ 1782252383040962560
author Burup Kristensen, Charlotte
Jensen, Jan Skov
Sogaard, Peter
Carstensen, Helle Gervig
Mogelvang, Rasmus
author_facet Burup Kristensen, Charlotte
Jensen, Jan Skov
Sogaard, Peter
Carstensen, Helle Gervig
Mogelvang, Rasmus
author_sort Burup Kristensen, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AFib) exists more frequently in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) than in patients without, and AFib may be a sign of progressive deterioration of AS. Echocardiographic assessment of AS in sinus rhythm is well documented, however, little is known about AFib in AS since such patients often are excluded from clinical echocardiographic trials. AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic importance of AFib in AS. METHODS: The study was designed as a single-center case-control study. Patients with AS and AFib were enrolled as cases (n = 103) and subsequently matched to controls (103 patients with AS but sinus rhythm). Cases and controls were matched according to age, gender and severity of AS. Primary outcome was all cause mortality and follow-up was 100% complete. RESULTS: Compared to controls the group with AFib had lower mean ejection fraction (42% vs. 49%; p < 0.001) and stroke volume (47 mL vs. 55 mL; p = 0.004), but higher heart rate (81 bpm vs. 68 bpm; p < 0.001) and no significant difference with regard to cardiac output (3.8 L vs. 4.0 L; p = 0.29). Accordingly, aortic jet velocity and gradients were significantly lower in AFib compared to controls but there were no differences (p = 0.38) in aortic valve area calculated by the continuity equation. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR: 1.2-3.6), 70 (34%) patients with AS died: 42 patients with AFib and 28 patients with sinus rhythm (p < 0.02). After adjusting for echocardiographic significant differences, AFib remained an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.72 (95% CI: 1.12–6.61), p < 0.03). There was no significant interaction (p = 0.62) between AFib and AS on the risk of mortality, indicating that AFib predicted bad outcome regardless of the severity of AS. CONCLUSIONS: AFib is an independent risk factor in patients with AS and the prognostic impact of AFib seems to be the same despite the severity of AS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3517318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35173182012-12-11 Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance Burup Kristensen, Charlotte Jensen, Jan Skov Sogaard, Peter Carstensen, Helle Gervig Mogelvang, Rasmus Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AFib) exists more frequently in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) than in patients without, and AFib may be a sign of progressive deterioration of AS. Echocardiographic assessment of AS in sinus rhythm is well documented, however, little is known about AFib in AS since such patients often are excluded from clinical echocardiographic trials. AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic importance of AFib in AS. METHODS: The study was designed as a single-center case-control study. Patients with AS and AFib were enrolled as cases (n = 103) and subsequently matched to controls (103 patients with AS but sinus rhythm). Cases and controls were matched according to age, gender and severity of AS. Primary outcome was all cause mortality and follow-up was 100% complete. RESULTS: Compared to controls the group with AFib had lower mean ejection fraction (42% vs. 49%; p < 0.001) and stroke volume (47 mL vs. 55 mL; p = 0.004), but higher heart rate (81 bpm vs. 68 bpm; p < 0.001) and no significant difference with regard to cardiac output (3.8 L vs. 4.0 L; p = 0.29). Accordingly, aortic jet velocity and gradients were significantly lower in AFib compared to controls but there were no differences (p = 0.38) in aortic valve area calculated by the continuity equation. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR: 1.2-3.6), 70 (34%) patients with AS died: 42 patients with AFib and 28 patients with sinus rhythm (p < 0.02). After adjusting for echocardiographic significant differences, AFib remained an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.72 (95% CI: 1.12–6.61), p < 0.03). There was no significant interaction (p = 0.62) between AFib and AS on the risk of mortality, indicating that AFib predicted bad outcome regardless of the severity of AS. CONCLUSIONS: AFib is an independent risk factor in patients with AS and the prognostic impact of AFib seems to be the same despite the severity of AS. BioMed Central 2012-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3517318/ /pubmed/23006976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-10-38 Text en Copyright ©2012 Burup Kristensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Burup Kristensen, Charlotte
Jensen, Jan Skov
Sogaard, Peter
Carstensen, Helle Gervig
Mogelvang, Rasmus
Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance
title Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance
title_full Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance
title_fullStr Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance
title_full_unstemmed Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance
title_short Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance
title_sort atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23006976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-10-38
work_keys_str_mv AT burupkristensencharlotte atrialfibrillationinaorticstenosisechocardiographicassessmentandprognosticimportance
AT jensenjanskov atrialfibrillationinaorticstenosisechocardiographicassessmentandprognosticimportance
AT sogaardpeter atrialfibrillationinaorticstenosisechocardiographicassessmentandprognosticimportance
AT carstensenhellegervig atrialfibrillationinaorticstenosisechocardiographicassessmentandprognosticimportance
AT mogelvangrasmus atrialfibrillationinaorticstenosisechocardiographicassessmentandprognosticimportance