Cargando…

Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: Bronchodilator response in patients with asthma is evaluated based on post-bronchodilator increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC). However, the need for additional parameters, mainly among patients with severe asthma, has already been d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azevedo, Karen S, Luiz, Ronir R, Rocco, Patricia RM, Conde, Marcus B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22950529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-49
_version_ 1782252385399209984
author Azevedo, Karen S
Luiz, Ronir R
Rocco, Patricia RM
Conde, Marcus B
author_facet Azevedo, Karen S
Luiz, Ronir R
Rocco, Patricia RM
Conde, Marcus B
author_sort Azevedo, Karen S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bronchodilator response in patients with asthma is evaluated based on post-bronchodilator increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC). However, the need for additional parameters, mainly among patients with severe asthma, has already been demonstrated. METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of vital capacity (VC) and inspiratory capacity (IC) to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthma patients with persistent airflow obstruction. The 43 asthma patients enrolled in the study were stratified into moderate or severe airflow obstruction groups based on baseline FEV(1). All patients performed a 6-minute walk test before and after the bronchodilator (BD). A bipolar visual analogue scale post-BD was performed to assess clinical effect. The correlation between VC and IC and clinical response, determined by visual analogue scale (VAS) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT), was investigated. RESULTS: Patients in the severe group presented: 1) greater bronchodilator response in VC (48% vs 15%, p = 0.02), 2) a significant correlation between VC variation and the reduction in air trapping (Rs = 0.70; p < 0.01), 3) a significant agreement between VC and VAS score (kappa = 0.57; p < 0.01). There was no correlation between IC and the reduction in air trapping or clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: VC may be a useful additional parameter to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthma patients with severe airflow obstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3517328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35173282012-12-08 Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study Azevedo, Karen S Luiz, Ronir R Rocco, Patricia RM Conde, Marcus B BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Bronchodilator response in patients with asthma is evaluated based on post-bronchodilator increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC). However, the need for additional parameters, mainly among patients with severe asthma, has already been demonstrated. METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of vital capacity (VC) and inspiratory capacity (IC) to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthma patients with persistent airflow obstruction. The 43 asthma patients enrolled in the study were stratified into moderate or severe airflow obstruction groups based on baseline FEV(1). All patients performed a 6-minute walk test before and after the bronchodilator (BD). A bipolar visual analogue scale post-BD was performed to assess clinical effect. The correlation between VC and IC and clinical response, determined by visual analogue scale (VAS) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT), was investigated. RESULTS: Patients in the severe group presented: 1) greater bronchodilator response in VC (48% vs 15%, p = 0.02), 2) a significant correlation between VC variation and the reduction in air trapping (Rs = 0.70; p < 0.01), 3) a significant agreement between VC and VAS score (kappa = 0.57; p < 0.01). There was no correlation between IC and the reduction in air trapping or clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: VC may be a useful additional parameter to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthma patients with severe airflow obstruction. BioMed Central 2012-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3517328/ /pubmed/22950529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-49 Text en Copyright ©2012 Azevedo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Azevedo, Karen S
Luiz, Ronir R
Rocco, Patricia RM
Conde, Marcus B
Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study
title Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study
title_full Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study
title_fullStr Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study
title_short Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study
title_sort vital capacity and inspiratory capacity as additional parameters to evaluate bronchodilator response in asthmatic patients: a cross sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22950529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-49
work_keys_str_mv AT azevedokarens vitalcapacityandinspiratorycapacityasadditionalparameterstoevaluatebronchodilatorresponseinasthmaticpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT luizronirr vitalcapacityandinspiratorycapacityasadditionalparameterstoevaluatebronchodilatorresponseinasthmaticpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT roccopatriciarm vitalcapacityandinspiratorycapacityasadditionalparameterstoevaluatebronchodilatorresponseinasthmaticpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT condemarcusb vitalcapacityandinspiratorycapacityasadditionalparameterstoevaluatebronchodilatorresponseinasthmaticpatientsacrosssectionalstudy