Cargando…

The functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury

BACKGROUND: The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) was recently developed to predict physical function in acute lung injury patients using comorbidity data. Our objectives were to determine: (1) the inter-rater reliability of the FCI collected using in-patient discharge summaries (primary objective)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Eddy, Gifford, Jeneen M, Chandolu, Satish, Colantuoni, Elizabeth, Pronovost, Peter J, Needham, Dale M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22974239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-21
_version_ 1782252395806326784
author Fan, Eddy
Gifford, Jeneen M
Chandolu, Satish
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Pronovost, Peter J
Needham, Dale M
author_facet Fan, Eddy
Gifford, Jeneen M
Chandolu, Satish
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Pronovost, Peter J
Needham, Dale M
author_sort Fan, Eddy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) was recently developed to predict physical function in acute lung injury patients using comorbidity data. Our objectives were to determine: (1) the inter-rater reliability of the FCI collected using in-patient discharge summaries (primary objective); and (2) the accuracy and predictive validity of the FCI collected using hospital discharge summaries and admission records versus complete chart review (secondary objectives). METHODS: For reliability, we evaluated the FCI’s intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) among trained research staff performing data collection for 421 acute lung injury patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study. For validity and accuracy, we compared the detection of FCI comorbidities across three types of inpatient medical records, and the association of the respective FCI scores obtained with patients’ SF-36 physical function subscale (PFS) scores at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was near-perfect (ICC 0.91; 95% CI 0.89-0.94). Hospital admission records and discharge summaries (vs. complete chart review) significantly underestimated the total FCI score. However, using multivariable linear regression, FCI scores collected using each of the three types of inpatient medical records had similar associations with PFS, suggesting similar predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Data collection using in-patient discharge summaries represents a reliable and valid method for collecting FCI comorbidity information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3517372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35173722012-12-08 The functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury Fan, Eddy Gifford, Jeneen M Chandolu, Satish Colantuoni, Elizabeth Pronovost, Peter J Needham, Dale M BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) was recently developed to predict physical function in acute lung injury patients using comorbidity data. Our objectives were to determine: (1) the inter-rater reliability of the FCI collected using in-patient discharge summaries (primary objective); and (2) the accuracy and predictive validity of the FCI collected using hospital discharge summaries and admission records versus complete chart review (secondary objectives). METHODS: For reliability, we evaluated the FCI’s intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) among trained research staff performing data collection for 421 acute lung injury patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study. For validity and accuracy, we compared the detection of FCI comorbidities across three types of inpatient medical records, and the association of the respective FCI scores obtained with patients’ SF-36 physical function subscale (PFS) scores at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was near-perfect (ICC 0.91; 95% CI 0.89-0.94). Hospital admission records and discharge summaries (vs. complete chart review) significantly underestimated the total FCI score. However, using multivariable linear regression, FCI scores collected using each of the three types of inpatient medical records had similar associations with PFS, suggesting similar predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Data collection using in-patient discharge summaries represents a reliable and valid method for collecting FCI comorbidity information. BioMed Central 2012-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3517372/ /pubmed/22974239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-21 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fan, Eddy
Gifford, Jeneen M
Chandolu, Satish
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Pronovost, Peter J
Needham, Dale M
The functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury
title The functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury
title_full The functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury
title_fullStr The functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury
title_full_unstemmed The functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury
title_short The functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury
title_sort functional comorbidity index had high inter-rater reliability in patients with acute lung injury
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22974239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-21
work_keys_str_mv AT faneddy thefunctionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT giffordjeneenm thefunctionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT chandolusatish thefunctionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT colantuonielizabeth thefunctionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT pronovostpeterj thefunctionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT needhamdalem thefunctionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT faneddy functionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT giffordjeneenm functionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT chandolusatish functionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT colantuonielizabeth functionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT pronovostpeterj functionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury
AT needhamdalem functionalcomorbidityindexhadhighinterraterreliabilityinpatientswithacutelunginjury