Cargando…

The Effect of Badger Culling on Breakdown Prolongation and Recurrence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds in Great Britain

Bovine tuberculosis is endemic in cattle herds in Great Britain, with a substantial economic impact. A reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis within the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) population is thought to have hindered disease control. Cattle herd incidents, termed breakdowns, that are either ‘prolonge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karolemeas, Katerina, Donnelly, Christl A., Conlan, Andrew J. K., Mitchell, Andrew P., Clifton-Hadley, Richard S., Upton, Paul, Wood, James L. N., McKinley, Trevelyan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051342
_version_ 1782252407246290944
author Karolemeas, Katerina
Donnelly, Christl A.
Conlan, Andrew J. K.
Mitchell, Andrew P.
Clifton-Hadley, Richard S.
Upton, Paul
Wood, James L. N.
McKinley, Trevelyan J.
author_facet Karolemeas, Katerina
Donnelly, Christl A.
Conlan, Andrew J. K.
Mitchell, Andrew P.
Clifton-Hadley, Richard S.
Upton, Paul
Wood, James L. N.
McKinley, Trevelyan J.
author_sort Karolemeas, Katerina
collection PubMed
description Bovine tuberculosis is endemic in cattle herds in Great Britain, with a substantial economic impact. A reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis within the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) population is thought to have hindered disease control. Cattle herd incidents, termed breakdowns, that are either ‘prolonged’ (lasting ≥240 days) or ‘recurrent’ (with another breakdown within a specified time period) may be important foci for onward spread of infection. They drain veterinary resources and can be demoralising for farmers. Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) data were re-analysed to examine the effects of two culling strategies on breakdown prolongation and recurrence, during and after culling, using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Separate effect estimates were obtained for the ‘core’ trial areas (where culling occurred) and the ‘buffer’ zones (up to 2 km outside of the core areas). For breakdowns that started during the culling period, ‘reactive’ (localised) culling was associated with marginally increased odds of prolongation, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.7 (95% credible interval [CI] 1.1–2.4) within the core areas. This effect was not present after the culling ceased. There was no notable effect of ‘proactive’ culling on prolongation. In contrast, reactive culling had no effect on breakdown recurrence, though there was evidence of a reduced risk of recurrence in proactive core areas during the culling period (ORs and 95% CIs: 0.82 (0.64–1.0) and 0.69 (0.54–0.86) for 24- and 36-month recurrence respectively). Again these effects were not present after the culling ceased. There seemed to be no effect of culling on breakdown prolongation or recurrence in the buffer zones. These results suggest that the RBCT badger culling strategies are unlikely to reduce either the prolongation or recurrence of breakdowns in the long term, and that reactive strategies (such as employed during the RBCT) are, if anything, likely to impact detrimentally on breakdown persistence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3517421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35174212012-12-12 The Effect of Badger Culling on Breakdown Prolongation and Recurrence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds in Great Britain Karolemeas, Katerina Donnelly, Christl A. Conlan, Andrew J. K. Mitchell, Andrew P. Clifton-Hadley, Richard S. Upton, Paul Wood, James L. N. McKinley, Trevelyan J. PLoS One Research Article Bovine tuberculosis is endemic in cattle herds in Great Britain, with a substantial economic impact. A reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis within the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) population is thought to have hindered disease control. Cattle herd incidents, termed breakdowns, that are either ‘prolonged’ (lasting ≥240 days) or ‘recurrent’ (with another breakdown within a specified time period) may be important foci for onward spread of infection. They drain veterinary resources and can be demoralising for farmers. Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) data were re-analysed to examine the effects of two culling strategies on breakdown prolongation and recurrence, during and after culling, using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Separate effect estimates were obtained for the ‘core’ trial areas (where culling occurred) and the ‘buffer’ zones (up to 2 km outside of the core areas). For breakdowns that started during the culling period, ‘reactive’ (localised) culling was associated with marginally increased odds of prolongation, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.7 (95% credible interval [CI] 1.1–2.4) within the core areas. This effect was not present after the culling ceased. There was no notable effect of ‘proactive’ culling on prolongation. In contrast, reactive culling had no effect on breakdown recurrence, though there was evidence of a reduced risk of recurrence in proactive core areas during the culling period (ORs and 95% CIs: 0.82 (0.64–1.0) and 0.69 (0.54–0.86) for 24- and 36-month recurrence respectively). Again these effects were not present after the culling ceased. There seemed to be no effect of culling on breakdown prolongation or recurrence in the buffer zones. These results suggest that the RBCT badger culling strategies are unlikely to reduce either the prolongation or recurrence of breakdowns in the long term, and that reactive strategies (such as employed during the RBCT) are, if anything, likely to impact detrimentally on breakdown persistence. Public Library of Science 2012-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3517421/ /pubmed/23236478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051342 Text en © 2012 Karolemeas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karolemeas, Katerina
Donnelly, Christl A.
Conlan, Andrew J. K.
Mitchell, Andrew P.
Clifton-Hadley, Richard S.
Upton, Paul
Wood, James L. N.
McKinley, Trevelyan J.
The Effect of Badger Culling on Breakdown Prolongation and Recurrence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds in Great Britain
title The Effect of Badger Culling on Breakdown Prolongation and Recurrence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds in Great Britain
title_full The Effect of Badger Culling on Breakdown Prolongation and Recurrence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds in Great Britain
title_fullStr The Effect of Badger Culling on Breakdown Prolongation and Recurrence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds in Great Britain
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Badger Culling on Breakdown Prolongation and Recurrence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds in Great Britain
title_short The Effect of Badger Culling on Breakdown Prolongation and Recurrence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds in Great Britain
title_sort effect of badger culling on breakdown prolongation and recurrence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle herds in great britain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051342
work_keys_str_mv AT karolemeaskaterina theeffectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT donnellychristla theeffectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT conlanandrewjk theeffectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT mitchellandrewp theeffectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT cliftonhadleyrichards theeffectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT uptonpaul theeffectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT woodjamesln theeffectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT mckinleytrevelyanj theeffectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT karolemeaskaterina effectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT donnellychristla effectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT conlanandrewjk effectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT mitchellandrewp effectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT cliftonhadleyrichards effectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT uptonpaul effectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT woodjamesln effectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain
AT mckinleytrevelyanj effectofbadgercullingonbreakdownprolongationandrecurrenceofbovinetuberculosisincattleherdsingreatbritain