Cargando…

Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review is to address treatment outcomes of Mandibular implant overdentures relative to implant survival rate, maintenance and complications, and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted by a PubMed search strategy a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jeong-Yol, Kim, Ha-Young, Shin, Sang-Wan, Bryant, S. Ross
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236572
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.204
_version_ 1782252497210966016
author Lee, Jeong-Yol
Kim, Ha-Young
Shin, Sang-Wan
Bryant, S. Ross
author_facet Lee, Jeong-Yol
Kim, Ha-Young
Shin, Sang-Wan
Bryant, S. Ross
author_sort Lee, Jeong-Yol
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review is to address treatment outcomes of Mandibular implant overdentures relative to implant survival rate, maintenance and complications, and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted by a PubMed search strategy and hand-searching of relevant journals from included studies. Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) and comparative clinical trial studies on mandibular implant overdentures until August, 2010 were selected. Eleven studies from 1098 studies were finally selected and data were analyzed relative to number of implants. RESULTS: Six studies presented the data of the implant survival rate which ranged from 95% to 100% for 2 and 4 implant group and from 81.8% to 96.1% for 1 and 2 implant group. One study, which statistically compared implant survival rate showed no significant differences relative to the number of implants. The most common type of prosthetic maintenance and complications were replacement or reattaching of loose clips for 2 and 4 implant group, and denture repair due to the fracture around an implant for 1 and 2 implant groups. Most studies showed no significant differences in the rate of prosthetic maintenance and complication, and patient satisfaction regardless the number of implants. CONCLUSION: The implant survival rate of mandibular overdentures is high regardless of the number of implants. Denture maintenance is likely not inflenced substantially by the number of implants and patient satisfaction is typically high again regardless os the number of implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3517958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35179582012-12-12 Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review Lee, Jeong-Yol Kim, Ha-Young Shin, Sang-Wan Bryant, S. Ross J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review is to address treatment outcomes of Mandibular implant overdentures relative to implant survival rate, maintenance and complications, and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted by a PubMed search strategy and hand-searching of relevant journals from included studies. Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) and comparative clinical trial studies on mandibular implant overdentures until August, 2010 were selected. Eleven studies from 1098 studies were finally selected and data were analyzed relative to number of implants. RESULTS: Six studies presented the data of the implant survival rate which ranged from 95% to 100% for 2 and 4 implant group and from 81.8% to 96.1% for 1 and 2 implant group. One study, which statistically compared implant survival rate showed no significant differences relative to the number of implants. The most common type of prosthetic maintenance and complications were replacement or reattaching of loose clips for 2 and 4 implant group, and denture repair due to the fracture around an implant for 1 and 2 implant groups. Most studies showed no significant differences in the rate of prosthetic maintenance and complication, and patient satisfaction regardless the number of implants. CONCLUSION: The implant survival rate of mandibular overdentures is high regardless of the number of implants. Denture maintenance is likely not inflenced substantially by the number of implants and patient satisfaction is typically high again regardless os the number of implants. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012-11 2012-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3517958/ /pubmed/23236572 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.204 Text en © 2012 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jeong-Yol
Kim, Ha-Young
Shin, Sang-Wan
Bryant, S. Ross
Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review
title Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review
title_full Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review
title_fullStr Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review
title_short Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review
title_sort number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23236572
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.204
work_keys_str_mv AT leejeongyol numberofimplantsformandibularimplantoverdenturesasystematicreview
AT kimhayoung numberofimplantsformandibularimplantoverdenturesasystematicreview
AT shinsangwan numberofimplantsformandibularimplantoverdenturesasystematicreview
AT bryantsross numberofimplantsformandibularimplantoverdenturesasystematicreview