Cargando…

Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study

BACKGROUND: One major drawback in measuring ground-reaction forces during running is that it is time consuming to get representative ground-reaction force (GRF) values with a traditional force platform. An instrumented force measuring treadmill can overcome the shortcomings inherent to overground te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kluitenberg, Bas, Bredeweg, Steef W, Zijlstra, Sjouke, Zijlstra, Wiebren, Buist, Ida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3518245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23186326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-235
_version_ 1782252545212678144
author Kluitenberg, Bas
Bredeweg, Steef W
Zijlstra, Sjouke
Zijlstra, Wiebren
Buist, Ida
author_facet Kluitenberg, Bas
Bredeweg, Steef W
Zijlstra, Sjouke
Zijlstra, Wiebren
Buist, Ida
author_sort Kluitenberg, Bas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One major drawback in measuring ground-reaction forces during running is that it is time consuming to get representative ground-reaction force (GRF) values with a traditional force platform. An instrumented force measuring treadmill can overcome the shortcomings inherent to overground testing. The purpose of the current study was to determine the validity of an instrumented force measuring treadmill for measuring vertical ground-reaction force parameters during running. METHODS: Vertical ground-reaction forces of experienced runners (12 male, 12 female) were obtained during overground and treadmill running at slow, preferred and fast self-selected running speeds. For each runner, 7 mean vertical ground-reaction force parameters of the right leg were calculated based on five successful overground steps and 30 seconds of treadmill running data. Intraclass correlations (ICC((3,1))) and ratio limits of agreement (RLOA) were used for further analysis. RESULTS: Qualitatively, the overground and treadmill ground-reaction force curves for heelstrike runners and non-heelstrike runners were very similar. Quantitatively, the time-related parameters and active peak showed excellent agreement (ICCs between 0.76 and 0.95, RLOA between 5.7% and 15.5%). Impact peak showed modest agreement (ICCs between 0.71 and 0.76, RLOA between 19.9% and 28.8%). The maximal and average loading-rate showed modest to excellent ICCs (between 0.70 and 0.89), but RLOA were higher (between 34.3% and 45.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that the treadmill is a moderate to highly valid tool for the assessment of vertical ground-reaction forces during running for runners who showed a consistent landing strategy during overground and treadmill running. The high stride-to-stride variance during both overground and treadmill running demonstrates the importance of measuring sufficient steps for representative ground-reaction force values. Therefore, an instrumented treadmill seems to be suitable for measuring representative vertical ground-reaction forces during running.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3518245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35182452012-12-11 Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study Kluitenberg, Bas Bredeweg, Steef W Zijlstra, Sjouke Zijlstra, Wiebren Buist, Ida BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: One major drawback in measuring ground-reaction forces during running is that it is time consuming to get representative ground-reaction force (GRF) values with a traditional force platform. An instrumented force measuring treadmill can overcome the shortcomings inherent to overground testing. The purpose of the current study was to determine the validity of an instrumented force measuring treadmill for measuring vertical ground-reaction force parameters during running. METHODS: Vertical ground-reaction forces of experienced runners (12 male, 12 female) were obtained during overground and treadmill running at slow, preferred and fast self-selected running speeds. For each runner, 7 mean vertical ground-reaction force parameters of the right leg were calculated based on five successful overground steps and 30 seconds of treadmill running data. Intraclass correlations (ICC((3,1))) and ratio limits of agreement (RLOA) were used for further analysis. RESULTS: Qualitatively, the overground and treadmill ground-reaction force curves for heelstrike runners and non-heelstrike runners were very similar. Quantitatively, the time-related parameters and active peak showed excellent agreement (ICCs between 0.76 and 0.95, RLOA between 5.7% and 15.5%). Impact peak showed modest agreement (ICCs between 0.71 and 0.76, RLOA between 19.9% and 28.8%). The maximal and average loading-rate showed modest to excellent ICCs (between 0.70 and 0.89), but RLOA were higher (between 34.3% and 45.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that the treadmill is a moderate to highly valid tool for the assessment of vertical ground-reaction forces during running for runners who showed a consistent landing strategy during overground and treadmill running. The high stride-to-stride variance during both overground and treadmill running demonstrates the importance of measuring sufficient steps for representative ground-reaction force values. Therefore, an instrumented treadmill seems to be suitable for measuring representative vertical ground-reaction forces during running. BioMed Central 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3518245/ /pubmed/23186326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-235 Text en Copyright ©2012 Kluitenberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kluitenberg, Bas
Bredeweg, Steef W
Zijlstra, Sjouke
Zijlstra, Wiebren
Buist, Ida
Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study
title Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study
title_full Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study
title_fullStr Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study
title_short Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study
title_sort comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. a validation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3518245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23186326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-235
work_keys_str_mv AT kluitenbergbas comparisonofverticalgroundreactionforcesduringovergroundandtreadmillrunningavalidationstudy
AT bredewegsteefw comparisonofverticalgroundreactionforcesduringovergroundandtreadmillrunningavalidationstudy
AT zijlstrasjouke comparisonofverticalgroundreactionforcesduringovergroundandtreadmillrunningavalidationstudy
AT zijlstrawiebren comparisonofverticalgroundreactionforcesduringovergroundandtreadmillrunningavalidationstudy
AT buistida comparisonofverticalgroundreactionforcesduringovergroundandtreadmillrunningavalidationstudy