Cargando…

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Argument Retrieval and Reordering: An fMRI and EEG Study on Sentence Processing

In sentence processing, it is still unclear how the neural language network successfully establishes argument–verb dependencies in its spatiotemporal neuronal dynamics. Previous work has suggested that the establishment of subject–verb and object–verb dependencies requires argument retrieval from wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Lars, Obleser, Jonas, Kiebel, Stefan J., Friederici, Angela D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3518874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00523
_version_ 1782252592317857792
author Meyer, Lars
Obleser, Jonas
Kiebel, Stefan J.
Friederici, Angela D.
author_facet Meyer, Lars
Obleser, Jonas
Kiebel, Stefan J.
Friederici, Angela D.
author_sort Meyer, Lars
collection PubMed
description In sentence processing, it is still unclear how the neural language network successfully establishes argument–verb dependencies in its spatiotemporal neuronal dynamics. Previous work has suggested that the establishment of subject–verb and object–verb dependencies requires argument retrieval from working memory, and that dependency establishment in object-first sentences additionally necessitates argument reordering. We examine the spatiotemporal neuronal dynamics of the brain regions that subserve these sub-processes by crossing an argument reordering factor (i.e., subject-first versus object-first sentences) with an argument retrieval factor (i.e., short versus long argument–verb dependencies) in German. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we found that reordering demands focally activate the left pars opercularis (Broca’s area), while storage and retrieval demands activated left temporo-parietal (TP) regions. In addition, when analyzing the time course of fMRI-informed equivalent current dipole sources in the EEG at the subcategorizing verb, we found that activity in the TP-region occurs relatively early (40–180 ms), followed by activity in Broca’s area (300–500 ms). These findings were matched by topographical correlation analyses of fMRI activations in EEG sensor space, showing that, in the scalp potential, TP-region activity surfaces as an early positivity and IFG activity as a later positivity in the scalp potential. These results provide fine-grained evidence for spatiotemporally separable sub-processes of argument retrieval and reordering in sentence processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3518874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35188742012-12-17 Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Argument Retrieval and Reordering: An fMRI and EEG Study on Sentence Processing Meyer, Lars Obleser, Jonas Kiebel, Stefan J. Friederici, Angela D. Front Psychol Psychology In sentence processing, it is still unclear how the neural language network successfully establishes argument–verb dependencies in its spatiotemporal neuronal dynamics. Previous work has suggested that the establishment of subject–verb and object–verb dependencies requires argument retrieval from working memory, and that dependency establishment in object-first sentences additionally necessitates argument reordering. We examine the spatiotemporal neuronal dynamics of the brain regions that subserve these sub-processes by crossing an argument reordering factor (i.e., subject-first versus object-first sentences) with an argument retrieval factor (i.e., short versus long argument–verb dependencies) in German. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we found that reordering demands focally activate the left pars opercularis (Broca’s area), while storage and retrieval demands activated left temporo-parietal (TP) regions. In addition, when analyzing the time course of fMRI-informed equivalent current dipole sources in the EEG at the subcategorizing verb, we found that activity in the TP-region occurs relatively early (40–180 ms), followed by activity in Broca’s area (300–500 ms). These findings were matched by topographical correlation analyses of fMRI activations in EEG sensor space, showing that, in the scalp potential, TP-region activity surfaces as an early positivity and IFG activity as a later positivity in the scalp potential. These results provide fine-grained evidence for spatiotemporally separable sub-processes of argument retrieval and reordering in sentence processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3518874/ /pubmed/23248607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00523 Text en Copyright © 2012 Meyer, Obleser, Kiebel and Friederici. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Meyer, Lars
Obleser, Jonas
Kiebel, Stefan J.
Friederici, Angela D.
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Argument Retrieval and Reordering: An fMRI and EEG Study on Sentence Processing
title Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Argument Retrieval and Reordering: An fMRI and EEG Study on Sentence Processing
title_full Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Argument Retrieval and Reordering: An fMRI and EEG Study on Sentence Processing
title_fullStr Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Argument Retrieval and Reordering: An fMRI and EEG Study on Sentence Processing
title_full_unstemmed Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Argument Retrieval and Reordering: An fMRI and EEG Study on Sentence Processing
title_short Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Argument Retrieval and Reordering: An fMRI and EEG Study on Sentence Processing
title_sort spatiotemporal dynamics of argument retrieval and reordering: an fmri and eeg study on sentence processing
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3518874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00523
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerlars spatiotemporaldynamicsofargumentretrievalandreorderinganfmriandeegstudyonsentenceprocessing
AT obleserjonas spatiotemporaldynamicsofargumentretrievalandreorderinganfmriandeegstudyonsentenceprocessing
AT kiebelstefanj spatiotemporaldynamicsofargumentretrievalandreorderinganfmriandeegstudyonsentenceprocessing
AT friedericiangelad spatiotemporaldynamicsofargumentretrievalandreorderinganfmriandeegstudyonsentenceprocessing