Cargando…

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has become the first-line surgical technique for the management of renal tumors smaller than 4 cm. Its main advantages are an excellent oncologic control together with the preservation of nephron units. Moreover, it implies a shorter length of hos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campero, José M., Ramos, Christián G., Valdevenito, Raúl, Mercado, Alejandro, Fullá, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248523
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.102664
_version_ 1782252633171427328
author Campero, José M.
Ramos, Christián G.
Valdevenito, Raúl
Mercado, Alejandro
Fullá, Juan
author_facet Campero, José M.
Ramos, Christián G.
Valdevenito, Raúl
Mercado, Alejandro
Fullá, Juan
author_sort Campero, José M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has become the first-line surgical technique for the management of renal tumors smaller than 4 cm. Its main advantages are an excellent oncologic control together with the preservation of nephron units. Moreover, it implies a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and shorter recovering times for patients. CONTEXT: We included 100 patients who consecutively underwent LPN between years 2000 and 2010 in our institution. AIMS: The aim was to present our experience and to compare it with the results reported in the literature by other centers. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients (67 men and 33 women) who underwent LPN within years 2000 and 2010 were included in the study. In all cases, surgery was performed by the same surgeon (JMC). Data were collected retrospectively, including clinical and histopathologic information, as well as surgical and functional results. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test and SPSS v17 software. A P–value < 0.05 was considered significant in all the analyses. RESULTS: The indication for LPN was a renal tumor or a complex renal cyst in the 96% of the cases. A retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach was performed in the 62% and 38% of the cases, respectively. The average size of the tumor was 3.3 cm (range 1–8). The mean surgical time was 103.5 min (range 40–204). The mean estimated blood loss was 193.7 cc. The average hospital length of stay was 50.2 h. Six (6%) patients had complications related to the surgery. The majority (n = 2) was due to intraoperative bleeding. With an average follow-up time of 42.1 months, there is no tumor recurrence reported up to now. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are similar to those reported in the international literature. LPN is a challenging surgical technique that in hands of a trained and experienced surgeon has excellent and reproducible results for the management of small renal masses and cysts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3519108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35191082012-12-17 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon Campero, José M. Ramos, Christián G. Valdevenito, Raúl Mercado, Alejandro Fullá, Juan Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has become the first-line surgical technique for the management of renal tumors smaller than 4 cm. Its main advantages are an excellent oncologic control together with the preservation of nephron units. Moreover, it implies a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and shorter recovering times for patients. CONTEXT: We included 100 patients who consecutively underwent LPN between years 2000 and 2010 in our institution. AIMS: The aim was to present our experience and to compare it with the results reported in the literature by other centers. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients (67 men and 33 women) who underwent LPN within years 2000 and 2010 were included in the study. In all cases, surgery was performed by the same surgeon (JMC). Data were collected retrospectively, including clinical and histopathologic information, as well as surgical and functional results. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test and SPSS v17 software. A P–value < 0.05 was considered significant in all the analyses. RESULTS: The indication for LPN was a renal tumor or a complex renal cyst in the 96% of the cases. A retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach was performed in the 62% and 38% of the cases, respectively. The average size of the tumor was 3.3 cm (range 1–8). The mean surgical time was 103.5 min (range 40–204). The mean estimated blood loss was 193.7 cc. The average hospital length of stay was 50.2 h. Six (6%) patients had complications related to the surgery. The majority (n = 2) was due to intraoperative bleeding. With an average follow-up time of 42.1 months, there is no tumor recurrence reported up to now. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are similar to those reported in the international literature. LPN is a challenging surgical technique that in hands of a trained and experienced surgeon has excellent and reproducible results for the management of small renal masses and cysts. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3519108/ /pubmed/23248523 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.102664 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Campero, José M.
Ramos, Christián G.
Valdevenito, Raúl
Mercado, Alejandro
Fullá, Juan
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon
title Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon
title_full Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon
title_fullStr Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon
title_short Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon
title_sort laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248523
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.102664
work_keys_str_mv AT camperojosem laparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaseriesofonehundredcasesperformedbythesamesurgeon
AT ramoschristiang laparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaseriesofonehundredcasesperformedbythesamesurgeon
AT valdevenitoraul laparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaseriesofonehundredcasesperformedbythesamesurgeon
AT mercadoalejandro laparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaseriesofonehundredcasesperformedbythesamesurgeon
AT fullajuan laparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaseriesofonehundredcasesperformedbythesamesurgeon