Cargando…

A comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the oral and dental findings of uremic patients receiving hemodialysis and to compare the Results between diabetic and non-diabetic groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients undergoing hemodialysis were classified into diabetic and no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murali, Preethi, Narasimhan, Malathi, Periasamy, Soundararajan, Harikrishnan, Thamizh chelvan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248470
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.102490
_version_ 1782252644056694784
author Murali, Preethi
Narasimhan, Malathi
Periasamy, Soundararajan
Harikrishnan, Thamizh chelvan
author_facet Murali, Preethi
Narasimhan, Malathi
Periasamy, Soundararajan
Harikrishnan, Thamizh chelvan
author_sort Murali, Preethi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the oral and dental findings of uremic patients receiving hemodialysis and to compare the Results between diabetic and non-diabetic groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients undergoing hemodialysis were classified into diabetic and non-diabetic groups and examined for uremic oral manifestations, dental caries (DMFT), and periodontal status (CPITN). Mann-Whitney test of significance has been applied for analyzing DMFT score and chi-square test is used for analyzing CPITN score. RESULTS: Of the study group, 46% were diabetic and only 11% of them did not have any oral manifestation. Oral manifestations observed were xerostomia and uremic odor, which contributed to 47 (23%) and 37 (17%), respectively. Hyperpigmentation was present in 26 (12%), macroglossia in 23 (11%), and uremic tongue coating in 24 (11%). Mucosal petechiae were seen in 17 patients contributing to 8% of total patients. Eleven patients had tongue pallor (5%), 9 patients had glossitis with depapillation (4%), and 7 patients had dysgeusia (3%). Angular cheilitis and gingival swelling were seen in 5 patients (2%). CONCLUSION: The oral and dental manifestations were higher in prevalence in the study group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3519213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35192132012-12-17 A comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis Murali, Preethi Narasimhan, Malathi Periasamy, Soundararajan Harikrishnan, Thamizh chelvan J Oral Maxillofac Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the oral and dental findings of uremic patients receiving hemodialysis and to compare the Results between diabetic and non-diabetic groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients undergoing hemodialysis were classified into diabetic and non-diabetic groups and examined for uremic oral manifestations, dental caries (DMFT), and periodontal status (CPITN). Mann-Whitney test of significance has been applied for analyzing DMFT score and chi-square test is used for analyzing CPITN score. RESULTS: Of the study group, 46% were diabetic and only 11% of them did not have any oral manifestation. Oral manifestations observed were xerostomia and uremic odor, which contributed to 47 (23%) and 37 (17%), respectively. Hyperpigmentation was present in 26 (12%), macroglossia in 23 (11%), and uremic tongue coating in 24 (11%). Mucosal petechiae were seen in 17 patients contributing to 8% of total patients. Eleven patients had tongue pallor (5%), 9 patients had glossitis with depapillation (4%), and 7 patients had dysgeusia (3%). Angular cheilitis and gingival swelling were seen in 5 patients (2%). CONCLUSION: The oral and dental manifestations were higher in prevalence in the study group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3519213/ /pubmed/23248470 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.102490 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Murali, Preethi
Narasimhan, Malathi
Periasamy, Soundararajan
Harikrishnan, Thamizh chelvan
A comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis
title A comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis
title_full A comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis
title_fullStr A comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis
title_short A comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis
title_sort comparison of oral and dental manifestations in diabetic and non-diabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248470
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.102490
work_keys_str_mv AT muralipreethi acomparisonoforalanddentalmanifestationsindiabeticandnondiabeticuremicpatientsreceivinghemodialysis
AT narasimhanmalathi acomparisonoforalanddentalmanifestationsindiabeticandnondiabeticuremicpatientsreceivinghemodialysis
AT periasamysoundararajan acomparisonoforalanddentalmanifestationsindiabeticandnondiabeticuremicpatientsreceivinghemodialysis
AT harikrishnanthamizhchelvan acomparisonoforalanddentalmanifestationsindiabeticandnondiabeticuremicpatientsreceivinghemodialysis
AT muralipreethi comparisonoforalanddentalmanifestationsindiabeticandnondiabeticuremicpatientsreceivinghemodialysis
AT narasimhanmalathi comparisonoforalanddentalmanifestationsindiabeticandnondiabeticuremicpatientsreceivinghemodialysis
AT periasamysoundararajan comparisonoforalanddentalmanifestationsindiabeticandnondiabeticuremicpatientsreceivinghemodialysis
AT harikrishnanthamizhchelvan comparisonoforalanddentalmanifestationsindiabeticandnondiabeticuremicpatientsreceivinghemodialysis