Cargando…

Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance

BACKGROUND: Chemical insecticides against adult mosquitoes are a key element in most malaria management programmes, but their efficacy is threatened by the evolution of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes. By killing only older mosquitoes, entomopathogenic fungi can in principle significantly impact pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynch, Penelope A, Grimm, Uwe, Thomas, Matthew B, Read, Andrew F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-383
_version_ 1782252679149387776
author Lynch, Penelope A
Grimm, Uwe
Thomas, Matthew B
Read, Andrew F
author_facet Lynch, Penelope A
Grimm, Uwe
Thomas, Matthew B
Read, Andrew F
author_sort Lynch, Penelope A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chemical insecticides against adult mosquitoes are a key element in most malaria management programmes, but their efficacy is threatened by the evolution of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes. By killing only older mosquitoes, entomopathogenic fungi can in principle significantly impact parasite transmission while imposing much less selection for resistance. Here an assessment is made as to which of the wide range of possible virulence characteristics for fungal biopesticides best realise this potential. METHODS: With mathematical models that capture relevant timings and survival probabilities within successive feeding cycles, transmission and resistance-management metrics are used to compare susceptible and resistant mosquitoes exposed to no intervention, to conventional instant-kill interventions, and to delayed-action biopesticides with a wide range of virulence characteristics. RESULTS: Fungal biopesticides that generate high rates of mortality at around the time mosquitoes first become able to transmit the malaria parasite offer potential for large reductions in transmission while imposing low fitness costs. The best combinations of control and resistance management are generally accessed at high levels of coverage. Strains which have high virulence in malaria-infected mosquitoes but lower virulence in malaria-free mosquitoes offer the ultimate benefit in terms of minimizing selection pressure whilst maximizing impact on transmission. Exploiting this phenotype should be a target for product development. For indoor residual spray programmes, biopesticides may offer substantial advantages over the widely used pyrethroid-based insecticides. Not only do fungal biopesticides provide substantial resistance management gains in the long term, they may also provide greater reductions in transmission before resistance has evolved. This is because fungal spores do not have contact irritancy, reducing the chances that a blood-fed mosquito can survive an encounter and thus live long enough to transmit malaria. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-action products, such as fungal biopesticides, have the potential to achieve reductions in transmission comparable with those achieved with existing instant-kill insecticides, and to sustain this control for substantially longer once resistant alleles arise. Given the current insecticide resistance crisis, efforts should continue to fully explore the operational feasibility of this alternative approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3519523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35195232012-12-12 Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance Lynch, Penelope A Grimm, Uwe Thomas, Matthew B Read, Andrew F Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Chemical insecticides against adult mosquitoes are a key element in most malaria management programmes, but their efficacy is threatened by the evolution of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes. By killing only older mosquitoes, entomopathogenic fungi can in principle significantly impact parasite transmission while imposing much less selection for resistance. Here an assessment is made as to which of the wide range of possible virulence characteristics for fungal biopesticides best realise this potential. METHODS: With mathematical models that capture relevant timings and survival probabilities within successive feeding cycles, transmission and resistance-management metrics are used to compare susceptible and resistant mosquitoes exposed to no intervention, to conventional instant-kill interventions, and to delayed-action biopesticides with a wide range of virulence characteristics. RESULTS: Fungal biopesticides that generate high rates of mortality at around the time mosquitoes first become able to transmit the malaria parasite offer potential for large reductions in transmission while imposing low fitness costs. The best combinations of control and resistance management are generally accessed at high levels of coverage. Strains which have high virulence in malaria-infected mosquitoes but lower virulence in malaria-free mosquitoes offer the ultimate benefit in terms of minimizing selection pressure whilst maximizing impact on transmission. Exploiting this phenotype should be a target for product development. For indoor residual spray programmes, biopesticides may offer substantial advantages over the widely used pyrethroid-based insecticides. Not only do fungal biopesticides provide substantial resistance management gains in the long term, they may also provide greater reductions in transmission before resistance has evolved. This is because fungal spores do not have contact irritancy, reducing the chances that a blood-fed mosquito can survive an encounter and thus live long enough to transmit malaria. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-action products, such as fungal biopesticides, have the potential to achieve reductions in transmission comparable with those achieved with existing instant-kill insecticides, and to sustain this control for substantially longer once resistant alleles arise. Given the current insecticide resistance crisis, efforts should continue to fully explore the operational feasibility of this alternative approach. BioMed Central 2012-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3519523/ /pubmed/23171286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-383 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lynch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lynch, Penelope A
Grimm, Uwe
Thomas, Matthew B
Read, Andrew F
Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance
title Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance
title_full Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance
title_fullStr Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance
title_full_unstemmed Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance
title_short Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance
title_sort prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-383
work_keys_str_mv AT lynchpenelopea prospectivemalariacontrolusingentomopathogenicfungicomparativeevaluationofimpactontransmissionandselectionforresistance
AT grimmuwe prospectivemalariacontrolusingentomopathogenicfungicomparativeevaluationofimpactontransmissionandselectionforresistance
AT thomasmatthewb prospectivemalariacontrolusingentomopathogenicfungicomparativeevaluationofimpactontransmissionandselectionforresistance
AT readandrewf prospectivemalariacontrolusingentomopathogenicfungicomparativeevaluationofimpactontransmissionandselectionforresistance