Cargando…

In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions

BACKGROUND: Contact lens-related infections are often associated with inadequate contact lens hygiene, and therefore, contact lens care products should be able to sufficiently minimise the amount of pathogens that are responsible for these infections. In 2001, the EN ISO 14729 was introduced to ensu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hildebrandt, Claudia, Wagner, Daniela, Kohlmann, Thomas, Kramer, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-241
_version_ 1782252718686994432
author Hildebrandt, Claudia
Wagner, Daniela
Kohlmann, Thomas
Kramer, Axel
author_facet Hildebrandt, Claudia
Wagner, Daniela
Kohlmann, Thomas
Kramer, Axel
author_sort Hildebrandt, Claudia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contact lens-related infections are often associated with inadequate contact lens hygiene, and therefore, contact lens care products should be able to sufficiently minimise the amount of pathogens that are responsible for these infections. In 2001, the EN ISO 14729 was introduced to ensure adequate disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions, but this norm has recently been criticised. METHODS: In this study, six frequently used contact lens care solutions were retested according to the Stand Alone Test of the EN ISO 14729 (2001). The Stand Alone Test is a quantitative suspension test. In addition, the products were tested in a modified setting adding an organic load. The load was a mixture of human blood serum, lysozyme, and mucine, which resembles tear fluid. RESULTS: The criteria of the Stand Alone Test recommended in EN ISO 14729 were only met by Aosept Plus. This 3% hydrogen-peroxide-based contact lens care solution attained a reduction factor of > 5 log units for bacteria and > 4 for fungi in all cases. Two further contact lens care solutions, Blue Vision and Optifree Replenish, met the criteria of a reduction factor of > 3 log units for bacteria and > 1 log unit for fungi, but only in the presence of artificial tear fluid. The three remaining products did not exhibit adequate disinfecting efficacy, at least against one of the tested microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Through the observation that the artificial tear fluid used in this study influences the disinfecting efficacy of contact lens care solutions, especially that of multi-purpose solutions, in a different way than does albumin, mucine, or even the organic load suggested in EN ISO 14729, it becomes obvious that the test conditions in the EN ISO 14729 should be revised in order to create more realistic conditions, e.g., by using a more realistic artificial tear fluid. Furthermore, we suggest adapting the EN ISO 14729 to the European test hierarchy for chemical disinfectants and antiseptics, which consists of three test phases and also requests meeting stricter criteria in order to pass the test. Unless the test conditions guarantee a sufficient reduction of potential pathogens, the risk of contact lens-related microbial keratitis and other infections will remain for the users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3519705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35197052012-12-12 In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions Hildebrandt, Claudia Wagner, Daniela Kohlmann, Thomas Kramer, Axel BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Contact lens-related infections are often associated with inadequate contact lens hygiene, and therefore, contact lens care products should be able to sufficiently minimise the amount of pathogens that are responsible for these infections. In 2001, the EN ISO 14729 was introduced to ensure adequate disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions, but this norm has recently been criticised. METHODS: In this study, six frequently used contact lens care solutions were retested according to the Stand Alone Test of the EN ISO 14729 (2001). The Stand Alone Test is a quantitative suspension test. In addition, the products were tested in a modified setting adding an organic load. The load was a mixture of human blood serum, lysozyme, and mucine, which resembles tear fluid. RESULTS: The criteria of the Stand Alone Test recommended in EN ISO 14729 were only met by Aosept Plus. This 3% hydrogen-peroxide-based contact lens care solution attained a reduction factor of > 5 log units for bacteria and > 4 for fungi in all cases. Two further contact lens care solutions, Blue Vision and Optifree Replenish, met the criteria of a reduction factor of > 3 log units for bacteria and > 1 log unit for fungi, but only in the presence of artificial tear fluid. The three remaining products did not exhibit adequate disinfecting efficacy, at least against one of the tested microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Through the observation that the artificial tear fluid used in this study influences the disinfecting efficacy of contact lens care solutions, especially that of multi-purpose solutions, in a different way than does albumin, mucine, or even the organic load suggested in EN ISO 14729, it becomes obvious that the test conditions in the EN ISO 14729 should be revised in order to create more realistic conditions, e.g., by using a more realistic artificial tear fluid. Furthermore, we suggest adapting the EN ISO 14729 to the European test hierarchy for chemical disinfectants and antiseptics, which consists of three test phases and also requests meeting stricter criteria in order to pass the test. Unless the test conditions guarantee a sufficient reduction of potential pathogens, the risk of contact lens-related microbial keratitis and other infections will remain for the users. BioMed Central 2012-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3519705/ /pubmed/23033880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-241 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hildebrandt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hildebrandt, Claudia
Wagner, Daniela
Kohlmann, Thomas
Kramer, Axel
In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions
title In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions
title_full In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions
title_fullStr In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions
title_full_unstemmed In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions
title_short In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions
title_sort in-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23033880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-241
work_keys_str_mv AT hildebrandtclaudia invitroanalysisofthemicrobicidalactivityof6contactlenscaresolutions
AT wagnerdaniela invitroanalysisofthemicrobicidalactivityof6contactlenscaresolutions
AT kohlmannthomas invitroanalysisofthemicrobicidalactivityof6contactlenscaresolutions
AT krameraxel invitroanalysisofthemicrobicidalactivityof6contactlenscaresolutions