Cargando…

Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures

BACKGROUND: Multilevel analyses are ideally suited to assess the effects of ecological (higher level) and individual (lower level) exposure variables simultaneously. In applying such analyses to measures of ecologies in epidemiological studies, individual variables are usually aggregated into the hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suzuki, Etsuji, Yamamoto, Eiji, Takao, Soshi, Kawachi, Ichiro, Subramanian, S. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051717
_version_ 1782252726517760000
author Suzuki, Etsuji
Yamamoto, Eiji
Takao, Soshi
Kawachi, Ichiro
Subramanian, S. V.
author_facet Suzuki, Etsuji
Yamamoto, Eiji
Takao, Soshi
Kawachi, Ichiro
Subramanian, S. V.
author_sort Suzuki, Etsuji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multilevel analyses are ideally suited to assess the effects of ecological (higher level) and individual (lower level) exposure variables simultaneously. In applying such analyses to measures of ecologies in epidemiological studies, individual variables are usually aggregated into the higher level unit. Typically, the aggregated measure includes responses of every individual belonging to that group (i.e. it constitutes a self-included measure). More recently, researchers have developed an aggregate measure which excludes the response of the individual to whom the aggregate measure is linked (i.e. a self-excluded measure). In this study, we clarify the substantive and technical properties of these two measures when they are used as exposures in multilevel models. METHODS: Although the differences between the two aggregated measures are mathematically subtle, distinguishing between them is important in terms of the specific scientific questions to be addressed. We then show how these measures can be used in two distinct types of multilevel models—self-included model and self-excluded model—and interpret the parameters in each model by imposing hypothetical interventions. The concept is tested on empirical data of workplace social capital and employees' systolic blood pressure. RESULTS: Researchers assume group-level interventions when using a self-included model, and individual-level interventions when using a self-excluded model. Analytical re-parameterizations of these two models highlight their differences in parameter interpretation. Cluster-mean centered self-included models enable researchers to decompose the collective effect into its within- and between-group components. The benefit of cluster-mean centering procedure is further discussed in terms of hypothetical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: When investigating the potential roles of aggregated variables, researchers should carefully explore which type of model—self-included or self-excluded—is suitable for a given situation, particularly when group sizes are relatively small.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3519740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35197402012-12-18 Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures Suzuki, Etsuji Yamamoto, Eiji Takao, Soshi Kawachi, Ichiro Subramanian, S. V. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Multilevel analyses are ideally suited to assess the effects of ecological (higher level) and individual (lower level) exposure variables simultaneously. In applying such analyses to measures of ecologies in epidemiological studies, individual variables are usually aggregated into the higher level unit. Typically, the aggregated measure includes responses of every individual belonging to that group (i.e. it constitutes a self-included measure). More recently, researchers have developed an aggregate measure which excludes the response of the individual to whom the aggregate measure is linked (i.e. a self-excluded measure). In this study, we clarify the substantive and technical properties of these two measures when they are used as exposures in multilevel models. METHODS: Although the differences between the two aggregated measures are mathematically subtle, distinguishing between them is important in terms of the specific scientific questions to be addressed. We then show how these measures can be used in two distinct types of multilevel models—self-included model and self-excluded model—and interpret the parameters in each model by imposing hypothetical interventions. The concept is tested on empirical data of workplace social capital and employees' systolic blood pressure. RESULTS: Researchers assume group-level interventions when using a self-included model, and individual-level interventions when using a self-excluded model. Analytical re-parameterizations of these two models highlight their differences in parameter interpretation. Cluster-mean centered self-included models enable researchers to decompose the collective effect into its within- and between-group components. The benefit of cluster-mean centering procedure is further discussed in terms of hypothetical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: When investigating the potential roles of aggregated variables, researchers should carefully explore which type of model—self-included or self-excluded—is suitable for a given situation, particularly when group sizes are relatively small. Public Library of Science 2012-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3519740/ /pubmed/23251609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051717 Text en © 2012 Suzuki et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suzuki, Etsuji
Yamamoto, Eiji
Takao, Soshi
Kawachi, Ichiro
Subramanian, S. V.
Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures
title Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures
title_full Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures
title_fullStr Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures
title_full_unstemmed Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures
title_short Clarifying the Use of Aggregated Exposures in Multilevel Models: Self-Included vs. Self-Excluded Measures
title_sort clarifying the use of aggregated exposures in multilevel models: self-included vs. self-excluded measures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051717
work_keys_str_mv AT suzukietsuji clarifyingtheuseofaggregatedexposuresinmultilevelmodelsselfincludedvsselfexcludedmeasures
AT yamamotoeiji clarifyingtheuseofaggregatedexposuresinmultilevelmodelsselfincludedvsselfexcludedmeasures
AT takaososhi clarifyingtheuseofaggregatedexposuresinmultilevelmodelsselfincludedvsselfexcludedmeasures
AT kawachiichiro clarifyingtheuseofaggregatedexposuresinmultilevelmodelsselfincludedvsselfexcludedmeasures
AT subramaniansv clarifyingtheuseofaggregatedexposuresinmultilevelmodelsselfincludedvsselfexcludedmeasures