Cargando…
The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen
BACKGROUND: Asplenic individuals are susceptible for overwhelming infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, carrying a high mortality. Although Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 is considered the major receptor for Gram-positive bacteria in innate immunity, it does not play a major role in host defense agai...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22721450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-139 |
_version_ | 1782252728335990784 |
---|---|
author | Lammers, Adriana J J de Porto, AlexanderPNA de Boer, Onno J Florquin, Sandrine van der Poll, Tom |
author_facet | Lammers, Adriana J J de Porto, AlexanderPNA de Boer, Onno J Florquin, Sandrine van der Poll, Tom |
author_sort | Lammers, Adriana J J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Asplenic individuals are susceptible for overwhelming infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, carrying a high mortality. Although Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 is considered the major receptor for Gram-positive bacteria in innate immunity, it does not play a major role in host defense against pneumococcal pneumonia. We wanted to investigate if in absence of an intact spleen as a first line of defense, the role of TLR2 during pneumococcal pneumonia becomes more significant, thereby explaining its insignificant role during infections in immune competent hosts. METHODS: We intranasally infected splenectomized wildtype (WT), TLR2 knock-out (KO) and TLR2/4 double KO mice with either serotype 2 or 3 S. pneumoniae. RESULTS: There were no differences between asplenic WT and TLR2KO mice of bacterial loads in lung homogenates and blood, cytokine and chemokine levels in the lungs, and lung pathology scores. TLR2/4 double KO mice were not impaired in bacterial control as well, which indicates that besides the interaction between S. pneumoniae and TLR2, the interaction between pneumolysin and TLR4 does not stimulate antibacterial defense in the asplenic host either. CONCLUSIONS: These results argue against a significant role of TLR2 in host defense during S. pneumoniae pneumonia in the asplenic state. Therefore, other components can provide sufficient backup mechanisms for TLR2 deficiency in the defense against intrapulmonary infections with S. pneumoniae of the otherwise immune competent host. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3519748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35197482012-12-12 The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen Lammers, Adriana J J de Porto, AlexanderPNA de Boer, Onno J Florquin, Sandrine van der Poll, Tom BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Asplenic individuals are susceptible for overwhelming infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, carrying a high mortality. Although Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 is considered the major receptor for Gram-positive bacteria in innate immunity, it does not play a major role in host defense against pneumococcal pneumonia. We wanted to investigate if in absence of an intact spleen as a first line of defense, the role of TLR2 during pneumococcal pneumonia becomes more significant, thereby explaining its insignificant role during infections in immune competent hosts. METHODS: We intranasally infected splenectomized wildtype (WT), TLR2 knock-out (KO) and TLR2/4 double KO mice with either serotype 2 or 3 S. pneumoniae. RESULTS: There were no differences between asplenic WT and TLR2KO mice of bacterial loads in lung homogenates and blood, cytokine and chemokine levels in the lungs, and lung pathology scores. TLR2/4 double KO mice were not impaired in bacterial control as well, which indicates that besides the interaction between S. pneumoniae and TLR2, the interaction between pneumolysin and TLR4 does not stimulate antibacterial defense in the asplenic host either. CONCLUSIONS: These results argue against a significant role of TLR2 in host defense during S. pneumoniae pneumonia in the asplenic state. Therefore, other components can provide sufficient backup mechanisms for TLR2 deficiency in the defense against intrapulmonary infections with S. pneumoniae of the otherwise immune competent host. BioMed Central 2012-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3519748/ /pubmed/22721450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-139 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lammers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lammers, Adriana J J de Porto, AlexanderPNA de Boer, Onno J Florquin, Sandrine van der Poll, Tom The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen |
title | The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen |
title_full | The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen |
title_fullStr | The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen |
title_short | The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen |
title_sort | role of tlr2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22721450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lammersadrianajj theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT deportoalexanderpna theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT deboeronnoj theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT florquinsandrine theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT vanderpolltom theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT lammersadrianajj roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT deportoalexanderpna roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT deboeronnoj roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT florquinsandrine roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen AT vanderpolltom roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen |