Cargando…

The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen

BACKGROUND: Asplenic individuals are susceptible for overwhelming infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, carrying a high mortality. Although Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 is considered the major receptor for Gram-positive bacteria in innate immunity, it does not play a major role in host defense agai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lammers, Adriana J J, de Porto, AlexanderPNA, de Boer, Onno J, Florquin, Sandrine, van der Poll, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22721450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-139
_version_ 1782252728335990784
author Lammers, Adriana J J
de Porto, AlexanderPNA
de Boer, Onno J
Florquin, Sandrine
van der Poll, Tom
author_facet Lammers, Adriana J J
de Porto, AlexanderPNA
de Boer, Onno J
Florquin, Sandrine
van der Poll, Tom
author_sort Lammers, Adriana J J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Asplenic individuals are susceptible for overwhelming infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, carrying a high mortality. Although Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 is considered the major receptor for Gram-positive bacteria in innate immunity, it does not play a major role in host defense against pneumococcal pneumonia. We wanted to investigate if in absence of an intact spleen as a first line of defense, the role of TLR2 during pneumococcal pneumonia becomes more significant, thereby explaining its insignificant role during infections in immune competent hosts. METHODS: We intranasally infected splenectomized wildtype (WT), TLR2 knock-out (KO) and TLR2/4 double KO mice with either serotype 2 or 3 S. pneumoniae. RESULTS: There were no differences between asplenic WT and TLR2KO mice of bacterial loads in lung homogenates and blood, cytokine and chemokine levels in the lungs, and lung pathology scores. TLR2/4 double KO mice were not impaired in bacterial control as well, which indicates that besides the interaction between S. pneumoniae and TLR2, the interaction between pneumolysin and TLR4 does not stimulate antibacterial defense in the asplenic host either. CONCLUSIONS: These results argue against a significant role of TLR2 in host defense during S. pneumoniae pneumonia in the asplenic state. Therefore, other components can provide sufficient backup mechanisms for TLR2 deficiency in the defense against intrapulmonary infections with S. pneumoniae of the otherwise immune competent host.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3519748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35197482012-12-12 The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen Lammers, Adriana J J de Porto, AlexanderPNA de Boer, Onno J Florquin, Sandrine van der Poll, Tom BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Asplenic individuals are susceptible for overwhelming infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, carrying a high mortality. Although Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 is considered the major receptor for Gram-positive bacteria in innate immunity, it does not play a major role in host defense against pneumococcal pneumonia. We wanted to investigate if in absence of an intact spleen as a first line of defense, the role of TLR2 during pneumococcal pneumonia becomes more significant, thereby explaining its insignificant role during infections in immune competent hosts. METHODS: We intranasally infected splenectomized wildtype (WT), TLR2 knock-out (KO) and TLR2/4 double KO mice with either serotype 2 or 3 S. pneumoniae. RESULTS: There were no differences between asplenic WT and TLR2KO mice of bacterial loads in lung homogenates and blood, cytokine and chemokine levels in the lungs, and lung pathology scores. TLR2/4 double KO mice were not impaired in bacterial control as well, which indicates that besides the interaction between S. pneumoniae and TLR2, the interaction between pneumolysin and TLR4 does not stimulate antibacterial defense in the asplenic host either. CONCLUSIONS: These results argue against a significant role of TLR2 in host defense during S. pneumoniae pneumonia in the asplenic state. Therefore, other components can provide sufficient backup mechanisms for TLR2 deficiency in the defense against intrapulmonary infections with S. pneumoniae of the otherwise immune competent host. BioMed Central 2012-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3519748/ /pubmed/22721450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-139 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lammers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lammers, Adriana J J
de Porto, AlexanderPNA
de Boer, Onno J
Florquin, Sandrine
van der Poll, Tom
The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen
title The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen
title_full The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen
title_fullStr The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen
title_full_unstemmed The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen
title_short The role of TLR2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen
title_sort role of tlr2 in the host response to pneumococcal pneumonia in absence of the spleen
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22721450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-139
work_keys_str_mv AT lammersadrianajj theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT deportoalexanderpna theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT deboeronnoj theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT florquinsandrine theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT vanderpolltom theroleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT lammersadrianajj roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT deportoalexanderpna roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT deboeronnoj roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT florquinsandrine roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen
AT vanderpolltom roleoftlr2inthehostresponsetopneumococcalpneumoniainabsenceofthespleen