Cargando…
Shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization
In nanomedicine, physicochemical properties of the nanocarrier affect the nanoparticle's pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, which are also decisive for the passive targeting and nonspecific cellular uptake of nanoparticles. Size and surface charge are, consequently, two main determining fact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22747910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-358 |
_version_ | 1782252731983986688 |
---|---|
author | Karaman, Didem Sen Desai, Diti Senthilkumar, Rajendran Johansson, Emma M Råtts, Natalie Odén, Magnus Eriksson, John E Sahlgren, Cecilia Toivola, Diana M Rosenholm, Jessica M |
author_facet | Karaman, Didem Sen Desai, Diti Senthilkumar, Rajendran Johansson, Emma M Råtts, Natalie Odén, Magnus Eriksson, John E Sahlgren, Cecilia Toivola, Diana M Rosenholm, Jessica M |
author_sort | Karaman, Didem Sen |
collection | PubMed |
description | In nanomedicine, physicochemical properties of the nanocarrier affect the nanoparticle's pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, which are also decisive for the passive targeting and nonspecific cellular uptake of nanoparticles. Size and surface charge are, consequently, two main determining factors in nanomedicine applications. Another important parameter which has received much less attention is the morphology (shape) of the nanocarrier. In order to investigate the morphology effect on the extent of cellular internalization, two similarly sized but differently shaped rod-like and spherical mesoporous silica nanoparticles were synthesized, characterized and functionalized to yield different surface charges. The uptake in two different cancer cell lines was investigated as a function of particle shape, coating (organic modification), surface charge and dose. According to the presented results, particle morphology is a decisive property regardless of both the different surface charges and doses tested, whereby rod-like particles internalized more efficiently in both cell lines. At lower doses whereby the shape-induced advantage is less dominant, charge-induced effects can, however, be used to fine-tune the cellular uptake as a prospective ‘secondary’ uptake regulator for tight dose control in nanoparticle-based drug formulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3519764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35197642012-12-12 Shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization Karaman, Didem Sen Desai, Diti Senthilkumar, Rajendran Johansson, Emma M Råtts, Natalie Odén, Magnus Eriksson, John E Sahlgren, Cecilia Toivola, Diana M Rosenholm, Jessica M Nanoscale Res Lett Nano Express In nanomedicine, physicochemical properties of the nanocarrier affect the nanoparticle's pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, which are also decisive for the passive targeting and nonspecific cellular uptake of nanoparticles. Size and surface charge are, consequently, two main determining factors in nanomedicine applications. Another important parameter which has received much less attention is the morphology (shape) of the nanocarrier. In order to investigate the morphology effect on the extent of cellular internalization, two similarly sized but differently shaped rod-like and spherical mesoporous silica nanoparticles were synthesized, characterized and functionalized to yield different surface charges. The uptake in two different cancer cell lines was investigated as a function of particle shape, coating (organic modification), surface charge and dose. According to the presented results, particle morphology is a decisive property regardless of both the different surface charges and doses tested, whereby rod-like particles internalized more efficiently in both cell lines. At lower doses whereby the shape-induced advantage is less dominant, charge-induced effects can, however, be used to fine-tune the cellular uptake as a prospective ‘secondary’ uptake regulator for tight dose control in nanoparticle-based drug formulations. Springer 2012-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3519764/ /pubmed/22747910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-358 Text en Copyright ©2012 Sen Karaman et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Nano Express Karaman, Didem Sen Desai, Diti Senthilkumar, Rajendran Johansson, Emma M Råtts, Natalie Odén, Magnus Eriksson, John E Sahlgren, Cecilia Toivola, Diana M Rosenholm, Jessica M Shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization |
title | Shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization |
title_full | Shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization |
title_fullStr | Shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization |
title_full_unstemmed | Shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization |
title_short | Shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization |
title_sort | shape engineering vs organic modification of inorganic nanoparticles as a tool for enhancing cellular internalization |
topic | Nano Express |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22747910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karamandidemsen shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT desaiditi shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT senthilkumarrajendran shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT johanssonemmam shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT rattsnatalie shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT odenmagnus shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT erikssonjohne shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT sahlgrencecilia shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT toivoladianam shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization AT rosenholmjessicam shapeengineeringvsorganicmodificationofinorganicnanoparticlesasatoolforenhancingcellularinternalization |