Cargando…

Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011

There were 83 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2011, which is an 11% increase in the number of articles since 2010. The quality of the submissions continues to increase. The editors had been delighted with the 2010 JCMR Impact Factor of 4.33, although...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pennell, Dudley J, Carpenter, John Paul, Firmin, David N, Kilner, Philip J, Mohiaddin, Raad H, Prasad, Sanjay K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23158097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-78
_version_ 1782252736578846720
author Pennell, Dudley J
Carpenter, John Paul
Firmin, David N
Kilner, Philip J
Mohiaddin, Raad H
Prasad, Sanjay K
author_facet Pennell, Dudley J
Carpenter, John Paul
Firmin, David N
Kilner, Philip J
Mohiaddin, Raad H
Prasad, Sanjay K
author_sort Pennell, Dudley J
collection PubMed
description There were 83 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2011, which is an 11% increase in the number of articles since 2010. The quality of the submissions continues to increase. The editors had been delighted with the 2010 JCMR Impact Factor of 4.33, although this fell modestly to 3.72 for 2011. The impact factor undergoes natural variation according to citation rates of papers in the 2 years following publication, and is significantly influenced by highly cited papers such as official reports. However, we remain very pleased with the progress of the journal's impact over the last 5 years. Our acceptance rate is approximately 25%, and has been falling as the number of articles being submitted has been increasing. In accordance with Open-Access publishing, the JCMR articles go on-line as they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, the Editors feel it is useful to summarize the papers for the readership into broad areas of interest or theme, which we feel would be useful, so that areas of interest from the previous year can be reviewed in a single article in relation to each other and other recent JCMR articles [1]. The papers are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought in the journal. We hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your quality manuscripts to JCMR for publication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3519784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35197842012-12-12 Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011 Pennell, Dudley J Carpenter, John Paul Firmin, David N Kilner, Philip J Mohiaddin, Raad H Prasad, Sanjay K J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Review There were 83 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2011, which is an 11% increase in the number of articles since 2010. The quality of the submissions continues to increase. The editors had been delighted with the 2010 JCMR Impact Factor of 4.33, although this fell modestly to 3.72 for 2011. The impact factor undergoes natural variation according to citation rates of papers in the 2 years following publication, and is significantly influenced by highly cited papers such as official reports. However, we remain very pleased with the progress of the journal's impact over the last 5 years. Our acceptance rate is approximately 25%, and has been falling as the number of articles being submitted has been increasing. In accordance with Open-Access publishing, the JCMR articles go on-line as they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, the Editors feel it is useful to summarize the papers for the readership into broad areas of interest or theme, which we feel would be useful, so that areas of interest from the previous year can be reviewed in a single article in relation to each other and other recent JCMR articles [1]. The papers are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought in the journal. We hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your quality manuscripts to JCMR for publication. BioMed Central 2012-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3519784/ /pubmed/23158097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-78 Text en Copyright ©2012 Pennell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Pennell, Dudley J
Carpenter, John Paul
Firmin, David N
Kilner, Philip J
Mohiaddin, Raad H
Prasad, Sanjay K
Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011
title Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011
title_full Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011
title_fullStr Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011
title_full_unstemmed Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011
title_short Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011
title_sort review of journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2011
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23158097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-78
work_keys_str_mv AT pennelldudleyj reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2011
AT carpenterjohnpaul reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2011
AT firmindavidn reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2011
AT kilnerphilipj reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2011
AT mohiaddinraadh reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2011
AT prasadsanjayk reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2011