Cargando…

DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy

BACKGROUND: More than 100 surgical approaches to treat rectal prolapse have been described. These can be done through the perineum or transabdominally. Delorme’s procedure is the most frequently used perineal, resection rectopexy the most commonly used abdominal procedure. Recurrences seem more comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rothenhoefer, Simone, Herrle, Florian, Herold, Alexander, Joos, Andreas, Bussen, Dieter, Kieser, Meinhard, Schiller, Petra, Klose, Christina, Seiler, Christoph M, Kienle, Peter, Post, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22931552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-155
_version_ 1782252743182778368
author Rothenhoefer, Simone
Herrle, Florian
Herold, Alexander
Joos, Andreas
Bussen, Dieter
Kieser, Meinhard
Schiller, Petra
Klose, Christina
Seiler, Christoph M
Kienle, Peter
Post, Stefan
author_facet Rothenhoefer, Simone
Herrle, Florian
Herold, Alexander
Joos, Andreas
Bussen, Dieter
Kieser, Meinhard
Schiller, Petra
Klose, Christina
Seiler, Christoph M
Kienle, Peter
Post, Stefan
author_sort Rothenhoefer, Simone
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: More than 100 surgical approaches to treat rectal prolapse have been described. These can be done through the perineum or transabdominally. Delorme’s procedure is the most frequently used perineal, resection rectopexy the most commonly used abdominal procedure. Recurrences seem more common after perineal compared to abdominal techniques, but the latter may carry a higher risk of peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS/DESIGN: DeloRes is a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded multicenter trial with two parallel groups. Patients with a full-thickness rectal prolapse (third degree prolapse), considered eligible for both operative methods are included. The primary outcome is time to recurrence of full-thickness rectal prolapse during the 24 months following primary surgery. Secondary endpoints are time to and incidence of recurrence of full-thickness rectal prolapse during the 5-year follow-up, duration of surgery, morbidity, hospital stay, quality of life, constipation, and fecal incontinence. A meta-analysis was done on the basis of the available data on recurrence rates from 17 publications comprising 1,140 patients. Based on the results of a meta-analysis it is assumed that the recurrence rate after 2 years is 20% for Delorme’s procedure and 5% for resection rectopexy. Considering a rate of lost to follow-up without recurrence of 30% a total of 130 patients (2 x 65 patients) was calculated as an adequate sample size to assure a power of 80% for the confirmatory analysis. DISCUSSION: The DeloRes Trial will clarify which procedure results in a smaller recurrence rate but also give information on how morbidity and functional results compare. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Number DRKS00000482
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3519813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35198132012-12-12 DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy Rothenhoefer, Simone Herrle, Florian Herold, Alexander Joos, Andreas Bussen, Dieter Kieser, Meinhard Schiller, Petra Klose, Christina Seiler, Christoph M Kienle, Peter Post, Stefan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: More than 100 surgical approaches to treat rectal prolapse have been described. These can be done through the perineum or transabdominally. Delorme’s procedure is the most frequently used perineal, resection rectopexy the most commonly used abdominal procedure. Recurrences seem more common after perineal compared to abdominal techniques, but the latter may carry a higher risk of peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS/DESIGN: DeloRes is a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded multicenter trial with two parallel groups. Patients with a full-thickness rectal prolapse (third degree prolapse), considered eligible for both operative methods are included. The primary outcome is time to recurrence of full-thickness rectal prolapse during the 24 months following primary surgery. Secondary endpoints are time to and incidence of recurrence of full-thickness rectal prolapse during the 5-year follow-up, duration of surgery, morbidity, hospital stay, quality of life, constipation, and fecal incontinence. A meta-analysis was done on the basis of the available data on recurrence rates from 17 publications comprising 1,140 patients. Based on the results of a meta-analysis it is assumed that the recurrence rate after 2 years is 20% for Delorme’s procedure and 5% for resection rectopexy. Considering a rate of lost to follow-up without recurrence of 30% a total of 130 patients (2 x 65 patients) was calculated as an adequate sample size to assure a power of 80% for the confirmatory analysis. DISCUSSION: The DeloRes Trial will clarify which procedure results in a smaller recurrence rate but also give information on how morbidity and functional results compare. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Number DRKS00000482 BioMed Central 2012-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3519813/ /pubmed/22931552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-155 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rothenhoefer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rothenhoefer, Simone
Herrle, Florian
Herold, Alexander
Joos, Andreas
Bussen, Dieter
Kieser, Meinhard
Schiller, Petra
Klose, Christina
Seiler, Christoph M
Kienle, Peter
Post, Stefan
DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy
title DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy
title_full DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy
title_fullStr DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy
title_full_unstemmed DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy
title_short DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy
title_sort delores trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22931552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-155
work_keys_str_mv AT rothenhoefersimone delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT herrleflorian delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT heroldalexander delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT joosandreas delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT bussendieter delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT kiesermeinhard delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT schillerpetra delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT klosechristina delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT seilerchristophm delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT kienlepeter delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy
AT poststefan delorestrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrialcomparingtwostandardizedsurgicalapproachesinrectalprolapsedelormesprocedureversusresectionrectopexy