Cargando…

Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen et al. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture rate of 13.7% per year over the past 33 years. Should this trend continue, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Launonen, Antti P, Lepola, Vesa, Flinkkilä, Tapio, Strandberg, Niko, Ojanperä, Johanna, Rissanen, Pekka, Malmivaara, Antti, Mattila, Ville M, Elo, Petra, Viljakka, Timo, Laitinen, Minna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3520878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-167
_version_ 1782252852046987264
author Launonen, Antti P
Lepola, Vesa
Flinkkilä, Tapio
Strandberg, Niko
Ojanperä, Johanna
Rissanen, Pekka
Malmivaara, Antti
Mattila, Ville M
Elo, Petra
Viljakka, Timo
Laitinen, Minna
author_facet Launonen, Antti P
Lepola, Vesa
Flinkkilä, Tapio
Strandberg, Niko
Ojanperä, Johanna
Rissanen, Pekka
Malmivaara, Antti
Mattila, Ville M
Elo, Petra
Viljakka, Timo
Laitinen, Minna
author_sort Launonen, Antti P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen et al. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture rate of 13.7% per year over the past 33 years. Should this trend continue, the fracture rate would triple over the next three decades. The increasing incidence of low-energy fractures raises questions about the optimal treatment in terms of functional outcome, pain, and rehabilitation time, as well as the economical impact. Despite the high incidence and costs of proximal humerus fractures, there is currently no valid scientific evidence for the best treatment method. Several publications, including a Cochrane review outline the need for high-quality, well-designed randomized controlled trials. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures achieves better functional outcome, pain relief, and patient satisfaction compared to conservative treatment. The trial is designed to compare conservative and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in patients 60 years and older. The trial includes two strata. Stratum I compares surgical treatment with locking plates to conservative treatment for two-part fractures. Stratum II compares multi-fragmented fractures, including three- and four-part fractures. The aim of Stratum II is to compare conservative treatment, surgical treatment with the Philos locking plate, and hemiarthroplasty with an Epoca prosthesis. The primary outcome measure will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the secondary outcome measures will be the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) value, OSS, Constant-Murley Score, VAS, and 15D. Recruiting time will be 3 years. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period. DISCUSSION: This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. It gives details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and also ways of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246167
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3520878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35208782012-12-13 Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study Launonen, Antti P Lepola, Vesa Flinkkilä, Tapio Strandberg, Niko Ojanperä, Johanna Rissanen, Pekka Malmivaara, Antti Mattila, Ville M Elo, Petra Viljakka, Timo Laitinen, Minna BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen et al. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture rate of 13.7% per year over the past 33 years. Should this trend continue, the fracture rate would triple over the next three decades. The increasing incidence of low-energy fractures raises questions about the optimal treatment in terms of functional outcome, pain, and rehabilitation time, as well as the economical impact. Despite the high incidence and costs of proximal humerus fractures, there is currently no valid scientific evidence for the best treatment method. Several publications, including a Cochrane review outline the need for high-quality, well-designed randomized controlled trials. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures achieves better functional outcome, pain relief, and patient satisfaction compared to conservative treatment. The trial is designed to compare conservative and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in patients 60 years and older. The trial includes two strata. Stratum I compares surgical treatment with locking plates to conservative treatment for two-part fractures. Stratum II compares multi-fragmented fractures, including three- and four-part fractures. The aim of Stratum II is to compare conservative treatment, surgical treatment with the Philos locking plate, and hemiarthroplasty with an Epoca prosthesis. The primary outcome measure will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the secondary outcome measures will be the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) value, OSS, Constant-Murley Score, VAS, and 15D. Recruiting time will be 3 years. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period. DISCUSSION: This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. It gives details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and also ways of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246167 BioMed Central 2012-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3520878/ /pubmed/22954329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-167 Text en Copyright ©2012 Launonen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Launonen, Antti P
Lepola, Vesa
Flinkkilä, Tapio
Strandberg, Niko
Ojanperä, Johanna
Rissanen, Pekka
Malmivaara, Antti
Mattila, Ville M
Elo, Petra
Viljakka, Timo
Laitinen, Minna
Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_full Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_short Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_sort conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. a prospective randomized study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3520878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-167
work_keys_str_mv AT launonenanttip conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT lepolavesa conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT flinkkilatapio conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT strandbergniko conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT ojanperajohanna conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT rissanenpekka conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT malmivaaraantti conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT mattilavillem conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT elopetra conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT viljakkatimo conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT laitinenminna conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy