Cargando…

Effects of Epidemic Diseases on the Distribution of Bonobos

This study examined how outbreaks and the occurrence of Anthrax, Ebola, Monkeypox and Trypanosomiasis may differentially affect the distribution of bonobos (Pan paniscus). Using a combination of mapping, Jaccard overlapping coefficients and binary regressions, the study determined how each disease c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inogwabini, Bila-Isia, Leader-Williams, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051112
_version_ 1782252884140752896
author Inogwabini, Bila-Isia
Leader-Williams, Nigel
author_facet Inogwabini, Bila-Isia
Leader-Williams, Nigel
author_sort Inogwabini, Bila-Isia
collection PubMed
description This study examined how outbreaks and the occurrence of Anthrax, Ebola, Monkeypox and Trypanosomiasis may differentially affect the distribution of bonobos (Pan paniscus). Using a combination of mapping, Jaccard overlapping coefficients and binary regressions, the study determined how each disease correlated with the extent of occurrence of, and the areas occupied by, bonobos. Anthrax has only been reported to occur outside the range of bonobos and so was not considered further. Ebola, Monkeypox and Trypanosomiasis were each reported within the area of occupancy of bonobos. Their respective overlap coefficients were: J = 0.10; Q(α = 0.05) = 2.00 (odds ratios = 0.0001, 95% CI = 0.0057; Z = −19.41, significant) for Ebola; J = 1.00; Q(α = 0.05) = 24.0 (odds ratios = 1.504, 95% CI = 0.5066–2.6122) for Monkeypox; and, J = 0.33; Q(α = 0.05) = 11.5 (Z = 1.14, significant) for Trypanosomiasis. There were significant relationships for the presence and absence of Monkeypox and Trypanosomiasis and the known extent of occurrence of bonobos, based on the equations y = 0.2368Ln(x)+0.8006 (R(2) = 0.9772) and y = −0.2942Ln(x)+0.7155 (R(2) = 0.698), respectively. The positive relationship suggested that bonobos tolerated the presence of Monkeypox. In contrast, the significant negative coefficient suggested that bonobos were absent in areas where Trypanosomiasis is endemic. Our results suggest that large rivers may have prevented Ebola from spreading into the range of bonobos. Meanwhile, Trypanosomiasis has been recorded among humans within the area of occurrence of bonobos, and appears the most important disease in shaping the area of occupancy of bonobos within their overall extent of occupancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3521019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35210192012-12-18 Effects of Epidemic Diseases on the Distribution of Bonobos Inogwabini, Bila-Isia Leader-Williams, Nigel PLoS One Research Article This study examined how outbreaks and the occurrence of Anthrax, Ebola, Monkeypox and Trypanosomiasis may differentially affect the distribution of bonobos (Pan paniscus). Using a combination of mapping, Jaccard overlapping coefficients and binary regressions, the study determined how each disease correlated with the extent of occurrence of, and the areas occupied by, bonobos. Anthrax has only been reported to occur outside the range of bonobos and so was not considered further. Ebola, Monkeypox and Trypanosomiasis were each reported within the area of occupancy of bonobos. Their respective overlap coefficients were: J = 0.10; Q(α = 0.05) = 2.00 (odds ratios = 0.0001, 95% CI = 0.0057; Z = −19.41, significant) for Ebola; J = 1.00; Q(α = 0.05) = 24.0 (odds ratios = 1.504, 95% CI = 0.5066–2.6122) for Monkeypox; and, J = 0.33; Q(α = 0.05) = 11.5 (Z = 1.14, significant) for Trypanosomiasis. There were significant relationships for the presence and absence of Monkeypox and Trypanosomiasis and the known extent of occurrence of bonobos, based on the equations y = 0.2368Ln(x)+0.8006 (R(2) = 0.9772) and y = −0.2942Ln(x)+0.7155 (R(2) = 0.698), respectively. The positive relationship suggested that bonobos tolerated the presence of Monkeypox. In contrast, the significant negative coefficient suggested that bonobos were absent in areas where Trypanosomiasis is endemic. Our results suggest that large rivers may have prevented Ebola from spreading into the range of bonobos. Meanwhile, Trypanosomiasis has been recorded among humans within the area of occurrence of bonobos, and appears the most important disease in shaping the area of occupancy of bonobos within their overall extent of occupancy. Public Library of Science 2012-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3521019/ /pubmed/23251431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051112 Text en © 2012 Inogwabini and Leader-Williams http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Inogwabini, Bila-Isia
Leader-Williams, Nigel
Effects of Epidemic Diseases on the Distribution of Bonobos
title Effects of Epidemic Diseases on the Distribution of Bonobos
title_full Effects of Epidemic Diseases on the Distribution of Bonobos
title_fullStr Effects of Epidemic Diseases on the Distribution of Bonobos
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Epidemic Diseases on the Distribution of Bonobos
title_short Effects of Epidemic Diseases on the Distribution of Bonobos
title_sort effects of epidemic diseases on the distribution of bonobos
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051112
work_keys_str_mv AT inogwabinibilaisia effectsofepidemicdiseasesonthedistributionofbonobos
AT leaderwilliamsnigel effectsofepidemicdiseasesonthedistributionofbonobos