Cargando…

Systematic Comparison of C3 and C4 Plants Based on Metabolic Network Analysis

BACKGROUND: The C4 photosynthetic cycle supercharges photosynthesis by concentrating CO(2 )around ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and significantly reduces the oxygenation reaction. Therefore engineering C4 feature into C3 plants has been suggested as a feasible way to increase photosynthesis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chuanli, Guo, Longyun, Li, Yixue, Wang, Zhuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23281598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-6-S2-S9
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The C4 photosynthetic cycle supercharges photosynthesis by concentrating CO(2 )around ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and significantly reduces the oxygenation reaction. Therefore engineering C4 feature into C3 plants has been suggested as a feasible way to increase photosynthesis and yield of C3 plants, such as rice, wheat, and potato. To identify the possible transition from C3 to C4 plants, the systematic comparison of C3 and C4 metabolism is necessary. RESULTS: We compared C3 and C4 metabolic networks using the improved constraint-based models for Arabidopsis and maize. By graph theory, we found the C3 network exhibit more dense topology structure than C4. The simulation of enzyme knockouts demonstrated that both C3 and C4 networks are very robust, especially when optimizing CO(2 )fixation. Moreover, C4 plant has better robustness no matter the objective function is biomass synthesis or CO(2 )fixation. In addition, all the essential reactions in C3 network are also essential for C4, while there are some other reactions specifically essential for C4, which validated that the basic metabolism of C4 plant is similar to C3, but C4 is more complex. We also identified more correlated reaction sets in C4, and demonstrated C4 plants have better modularity with complex mechanism coordinates the reactions and pathways than that of C3 plants. We also found the increase of both biomass production and CO(2 )fixation with light intensity and CO(2 )concentration in C4 is faster than that in C3, which reflected more efficient use of light and CO(2 )in C4 plant. Finally, we explored the contribution of different C4 subtypes to biomass production by setting specific constraints. CONCLUSIONS: All results are consistent with the actual situation, which indicate that Flux Balance Analysis is a powerful method to study plant metabolism at systems level. We demonstrated that in contrast to C3, C4 plants have less dense topology, higher robustness, better modularity, and higher CO(2 )and radiation use efficiency. In addition, preliminary analysis indicated that the rate of CO2 fixation and biomass production in PCK subtype are superior to NADP-ME and NAD-ME subtypes under enough supply of water and nitrogen.