Cargando…

Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence?

PURPOSE: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement is a well-known predictor for poor prognosis in rectal cancer. However, the significance is controversial in some studies. Accordingly, this study attempted to examine the prognostic impact of CRM involvement in stage III rectal cancer. MAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Jeonghyun, Kim, Hyunki, Hur, Hyuk, Min, Byung Soh, Baik, Seung Hyuk, Lee, Kang Young, Sohn, Seung Kook, Kim, Nam Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23225809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2013.54.1.131
_version_ 1782252919092936704
author Kang, Jeonghyun
Kim, Hyunki
Hur, Hyuk
Min, Byung Soh
Baik, Seung Hyuk
Lee, Kang Young
Sohn, Seung Kook
Kim, Nam Kyu
author_facet Kang, Jeonghyun
Kim, Hyunki
Hur, Hyuk
Min, Byung Soh
Baik, Seung Hyuk
Lee, Kang Young
Sohn, Seung Kook
Kim, Nam Kyu
author_sort Kang, Jeonghyun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement is a well-known predictor for poor prognosis in rectal cancer. However, the significance is controversial in some studies. Accordingly, this study attempted to examine the prognostic impact of CRM involvement in stage III rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2007, a total of 449 patients who underwent curative resection followed by complete adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for stage III rectal cancer located within 12 cm from the anal verge were selected. Patients were divided into a CRM-positive group (n=79, 17.6%) and a CRM-negative group (n=370, 82.4%). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 56.6 months, recurrent disease was seen in 53.2 and 43.5% of the CRM-positive and CRM-negative group, respectively. CRM involvement was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year systemic recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.5, CI: 1.0-2.2, p=0.017). However, no significant difference was observed for local recurrence rate between the two groups (13.0 and 13.5%, respectively, p=0.677). CONCLUSION: In this study, local recurrence rate did not differ according to CRM involvement status in stage III rectal cancer patients, although CRM involvement was shown to be an independent poor prognostic factor. Accordingly, validation of the results of this study by further large prospective randomized trials is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3521270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35212702013-01-01 Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence? Kang, Jeonghyun Kim, Hyunki Hur, Hyuk Min, Byung Soh Baik, Seung Hyuk Lee, Kang Young Sohn, Seung Kook Kim, Nam Kyu Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement is a well-known predictor for poor prognosis in rectal cancer. However, the significance is controversial in some studies. Accordingly, this study attempted to examine the prognostic impact of CRM involvement in stage III rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2007, a total of 449 patients who underwent curative resection followed by complete adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for stage III rectal cancer located within 12 cm from the anal verge were selected. Patients were divided into a CRM-positive group (n=79, 17.6%) and a CRM-negative group (n=370, 82.4%). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 56.6 months, recurrent disease was seen in 53.2 and 43.5% of the CRM-positive and CRM-negative group, respectively. CRM involvement was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year systemic recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.5, CI: 1.0-2.2, p=0.017). However, no significant difference was observed for local recurrence rate between the two groups (13.0 and 13.5%, respectively, p=0.677). CONCLUSION: In this study, local recurrence rate did not differ according to CRM involvement status in stage III rectal cancer patients, although CRM involvement was shown to be an independent poor prognostic factor. Accordingly, validation of the results of this study by further large prospective randomized trials is warranted. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2013-01-01 2012-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3521270/ /pubmed/23225809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2013.54.1.131 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kang, Jeonghyun
Kim, Hyunki
Hur, Hyuk
Min, Byung Soh
Baik, Seung Hyuk
Lee, Kang Young
Sohn, Seung Kook
Kim, Nam Kyu
Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence?
title Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence?
title_full Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence?
title_fullStr Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence?
title_full_unstemmed Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence?
title_short Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence?
title_sort circumferential resection margin involvement in stage iii rectal cancer patients treated with curative resection followed by chemoradiotherapy: a surrogate marker for local recurrence?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23225809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2013.54.1.131
work_keys_str_mv AT kangjeonghyun circumferentialresectionmargininvolvementinstageiiirectalcancerpatientstreatedwithcurativeresectionfollowedbychemoradiotherapyasurrogatemarkerforlocalrecurrence
AT kimhyunki circumferentialresectionmargininvolvementinstageiiirectalcancerpatientstreatedwithcurativeresectionfollowedbychemoradiotherapyasurrogatemarkerforlocalrecurrence
AT hurhyuk circumferentialresectionmargininvolvementinstageiiirectalcancerpatientstreatedwithcurativeresectionfollowedbychemoradiotherapyasurrogatemarkerforlocalrecurrence
AT minbyungsoh circumferentialresectionmargininvolvementinstageiiirectalcancerpatientstreatedwithcurativeresectionfollowedbychemoradiotherapyasurrogatemarkerforlocalrecurrence
AT baikseunghyuk circumferentialresectionmargininvolvementinstageiiirectalcancerpatientstreatedwithcurativeresectionfollowedbychemoradiotherapyasurrogatemarkerforlocalrecurrence
AT leekangyoung circumferentialresectionmargininvolvementinstageiiirectalcancerpatientstreatedwithcurativeresectionfollowedbychemoradiotherapyasurrogatemarkerforlocalrecurrence
AT sohnseungkook circumferentialresectionmargininvolvementinstageiiirectalcancerpatientstreatedwithcurativeresectionfollowedbychemoradiotherapyasurrogatemarkerforlocalrecurrence
AT kimnamkyu circumferentialresectionmargininvolvementinstageiiirectalcancerpatientstreatedwithcurativeresectionfollowedbychemoradiotherapyasurrogatemarkerforlocalrecurrence