Cargando…
Are There Great Savings with Rapid Urease Test by One-Plus-One?
Autor principal: | Choi, Il Ju |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251877 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.4.341 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Commentary: One plus one does not always equal two: Mitochondrial cardioprotection
por: Guariento, Alvise, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Mass testing for COVID-19 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: “One door-one test” approach
por: Dorjdagva, Javkhlanbayar, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Saving One Nostril
por: Konar, Subhas, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Inefficiency of Rapid Urease Test for Confirmation of Helicobacter pylori
por: Abadi, Amin Talebi Bezmin, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
por: Fan, Chi‐Chen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)