Cargando…

Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement

BACKGROUND: In a standard total knee replacement, tibial component alignment is a key factor for the long term success of the surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of extramedullary and intramedullary tibial cutting guides used in indigenous and imported implants respectively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karade, Vikas, Ravi, B, Agarwal, Manish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23031403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-33
_version_ 1782253165900464128
author Karade, Vikas
Ravi, B
Agarwal, Manish
author_facet Karade, Vikas
Ravi, B
Agarwal, Manish
author_sort Karade, Vikas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a standard total knee replacement, tibial component alignment is a key factor for the long term success of the surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of extramedullary and intramedullary tibial cutting guides used in indigenous and imported implants respectively, in positioning of the tibial components in megaprosthetic knee replacements. METHODS: A comparative study of the accuracy of extramedullary and intramedullary tibial cutting guides was carried out in 92 megaprosthetic knee replacements for distal femoral tumors. For the proximal tibia cut for tibial component placement, an extramedullary guide was used in 65 patients and an intramedullary guide was used in 27 patients. Tibial component alignment angles were measured in postoperative X-rays with the help of CAD software. RESULTS: There was more varus placement in coronal plane with extramedullary cutting guide (−1.18 +/− 2.4 degrees) than the intramedullary guide (−0.34 +/− 2.31 degrees) but this did not reach statistical significance. The goal of 90 +/− 2 degrees alignment of tibial component was achieved in 54% of patients in the extramedullary group versus 67% in the intramedullary group. In terms of sagittal plane alignment, extramedullary guide showed less accurate results (2.09 +/− 2.4 degrees) than intramedullary guide (0.50 +/− 3.80 degrees) for tibial component alignment, though 78% of patients were aligned within the goal of 0–5 degrees of tibial slope angle in extramedullary group versus 63% in intramedullary group. The mean error in the measurements due to rotation of the knee during taking the X-rays was less than 0.1 degrees and distribution of the X-rays with the rotation of knee was similar in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in megaprosthetic knee replacement intramedullary guides gave more accurate results in sagittal plane and exhibited similar variability as of extramedullary guides in coronal plane.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3523050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35230502012-12-21 Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement Karade, Vikas Ravi, B Agarwal, Manish J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In a standard total knee replacement, tibial component alignment is a key factor for the long term success of the surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of extramedullary and intramedullary tibial cutting guides used in indigenous and imported implants respectively, in positioning of the tibial components in megaprosthetic knee replacements. METHODS: A comparative study of the accuracy of extramedullary and intramedullary tibial cutting guides was carried out in 92 megaprosthetic knee replacements for distal femoral tumors. For the proximal tibia cut for tibial component placement, an extramedullary guide was used in 65 patients and an intramedullary guide was used in 27 patients. Tibial component alignment angles were measured in postoperative X-rays with the help of CAD software. RESULTS: There was more varus placement in coronal plane with extramedullary cutting guide (−1.18 +/− 2.4 degrees) than the intramedullary guide (−0.34 +/− 2.31 degrees) but this did not reach statistical significance. The goal of 90 +/− 2 degrees alignment of tibial component was achieved in 54% of patients in the extramedullary group versus 67% in the intramedullary group. In terms of sagittal plane alignment, extramedullary guide showed less accurate results (2.09 +/− 2.4 degrees) than intramedullary guide (0.50 +/− 3.80 degrees) for tibial component alignment, though 78% of patients were aligned within the goal of 0–5 degrees of tibial slope angle in extramedullary group versus 63% in intramedullary group. The mean error in the measurements due to rotation of the knee during taking the X-rays was less than 0.1 degrees and distribution of the X-rays with the rotation of knee was similar in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in megaprosthetic knee replacement intramedullary guides gave more accurate results in sagittal plane and exhibited similar variability as of extramedullary guides in coronal plane. BioMed Central 2012-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3523050/ /pubmed/23031403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-33 Text en Copyright ©2012 Karade et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karade, Vikas
Ravi, B
Agarwal, Manish
Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement
title Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement
title_full Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement
title_fullStr Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement
title_full_unstemmed Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement
title_short Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement
title_sort extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23031403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-33
work_keys_str_mv AT karadevikas extramedullaryversusintramedullarytibialcuttingguidesinmegaprosthetictotalkneereplacement
AT ravib extramedullaryversusintramedullarytibialcuttingguidesinmegaprosthetictotalkneereplacement
AT agarwalmanish extramedullaryversusintramedullarytibialcuttingguidesinmegaprosthetictotalkneereplacement