Cargando…
Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
BACKGROUND: A significant minority of patients do not receive all the evidence-based care recommended for their conditions. Health care quality may be improved by reducing this observed variation. Composite measures offer a different patient-centred perspective on quality and are utilized in acute h...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23043262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-351 |
_version_ | 1782253174292217856 |
---|---|
author | de Wet, Carl McKay, John Bowie, Paul |
author_facet | de Wet, Carl McKay, John Bowie, Paul |
author_sort | de Wet, Carl |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A significant minority of patients do not receive all the evidence-based care recommended for their conditions. Health care quality may be improved by reducing this observed variation. Composite measures offer a different patient-centred perspective on quality and are utilized in acute hospitals via the ‘care bundle’ concept as indicators of the reliability of specific (evidence-based) care delivery tasks and improved outcomes. A care bundle consists of a number of time-specific interventions that should be delivered to every patient every time. We aimed to apply the care bundle concept to selected QOF data to measure the quality of evidence-based care provision. METHODS: Care bundles and components were selected from QOF indicators according to defined criteria. Five clinical conditions were suitable for care bundles: Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Stroke & Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Each bundle has 3-8 components. A retrospective audit was undertaken in a convenience sample of nine general medical practices in the West of Scotland. Collected data included delivery (or not) of individual bundle components to all patients included on specific disease registers. Practice level and overall compliance with bundles and components were calculated in SPSS and expressed as a percentage. RESULTS: Nine practices (64.3%) with a combined patient population of 56,948 were able to provide data in the format requested. Overall compliance with developed QOF-based care bundles (composite measures) was as follows: CHD 64.0%, range 35.0-71.9%; Stroke/TIA 74.1%, range 51.6-82.8%; CKD 69.0%, range 64.0-81.4%; and COPD 82.0%, range 47.9-95.8%; and DM 58.4%, range 50.3-65.2%. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study compliance with individual QOF-based care bundle components was high, but overall (‘all or nothing’) compliance was substantially lower. Care bundles may provide a more informed measure of care quality than existing methods. However, the acceptability, feasibility and potential impact on clinical outcomes are unknown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3523087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35230872012-12-16 Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice de Wet, Carl McKay, John Bowie, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A significant minority of patients do not receive all the evidence-based care recommended for their conditions. Health care quality may be improved by reducing this observed variation. Composite measures offer a different patient-centred perspective on quality and are utilized in acute hospitals via the ‘care bundle’ concept as indicators of the reliability of specific (evidence-based) care delivery tasks and improved outcomes. A care bundle consists of a number of time-specific interventions that should be delivered to every patient every time. We aimed to apply the care bundle concept to selected QOF data to measure the quality of evidence-based care provision. METHODS: Care bundles and components were selected from QOF indicators according to defined criteria. Five clinical conditions were suitable for care bundles: Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Stroke & Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Each bundle has 3-8 components. A retrospective audit was undertaken in a convenience sample of nine general medical practices in the West of Scotland. Collected data included delivery (or not) of individual bundle components to all patients included on specific disease registers. Practice level and overall compliance with bundles and components were calculated in SPSS and expressed as a percentage. RESULTS: Nine practices (64.3%) with a combined patient population of 56,948 were able to provide data in the format requested. Overall compliance with developed QOF-based care bundles (composite measures) was as follows: CHD 64.0%, range 35.0-71.9%; Stroke/TIA 74.1%, range 51.6-82.8%; CKD 69.0%, range 64.0-81.4%; and COPD 82.0%, range 47.9-95.8%; and DM 58.4%, range 50.3-65.2%. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study compliance with individual QOF-based care bundle components was high, but overall (‘all or nothing’) compliance was substantially lower. Care bundles may provide a more informed measure of care quality than existing methods. However, the acceptability, feasibility and potential impact on clinical outcomes are unknown. BioMed Central 2012-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3523087/ /pubmed/23043262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-351 Text en Copyright ©2012 de Wet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Wet, Carl McKay, John Bowie, Paul Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice |
title | Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice |
title_full | Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice |
title_fullStr | Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice |
title_short | Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice |
title_sort | combining qof data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23043262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewetcarl combiningqofdatawiththecarebundleapproachmayprovideamoremeaningfulmeasureofqualityingeneralpractice AT mckayjohn combiningqofdatawiththecarebundleapproachmayprovideamoremeaningfulmeasureofqualityingeneralpractice AT bowiepaul combiningqofdatawiththecarebundleapproachmayprovideamoremeaningfulmeasureofqualityingeneralpractice |