Cargando…

Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice

BACKGROUND: A significant minority of patients do not receive all the evidence-based care recommended for their conditions. Health care quality may be improved by reducing this observed variation. Composite measures offer a different patient-centred perspective on quality and are utilized in acute h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Wet, Carl, McKay, John, Bowie, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23043262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-351
_version_ 1782253174292217856
author de Wet, Carl
McKay, John
Bowie, Paul
author_facet de Wet, Carl
McKay, John
Bowie, Paul
author_sort de Wet, Carl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A significant minority of patients do not receive all the evidence-based care recommended for their conditions. Health care quality may be improved by reducing this observed variation. Composite measures offer a different patient-centred perspective on quality and are utilized in acute hospitals via the ‘care bundle’ concept as indicators of the reliability of specific (evidence-based) care delivery tasks and improved outcomes. A care bundle consists of a number of time-specific interventions that should be delivered to every patient every time. We aimed to apply the care bundle concept to selected QOF data to measure the quality of evidence-based care provision. METHODS: Care bundles and components were selected from QOF indicators according to defined criteria. Five clinical conditions were suitable for care bundles: Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Stroke & Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Each bundle has 3-8 components. A retrospective audit was undertaken in a convenience sample of nine general medical practices in the West of Scotland. Collected data included delivery (or not) of individual bundle components to all patients included on specific disease registers. Practice level and overall compliance with bundles and components were calculated in SPSS and expressed as a percentage. RESULTS: Nine practices (64.3%) with a combined patient population of 56,948 were able to provide data in the format requested. Overall compliance with developed QOF-based care bundles (composite measures) was as follows: CHD 64.0%, range 35.0-71.9%; Stroke/TIA 74.1%, range 51.6-82.8%; CKD 69.0%, range 64.0-81.4%; and COPD 82.0%, range 47.9-95.8%; and DM 58.4%, range 50.3-65.2%. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study compliance with individual QOF-based care bundle components was high, but overall (‘all or nothing’) compliance was substantially lower. Care bundles may provide a more informed measure of care quality than existing methods. However, the acceptability, feasibility and potential impact on clinical outcomes are unknown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3523087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35230872012-12-16 Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice de Wet, Carl McKay, John Bowie, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A significant minority of patients do not receive all the evidence-based care recommended for their conditions. Health care quality may be improved by reducing this observed variation. Composite measures offer a different patient-centred perspective on quality and are utilized in acute hospitals via the ‘care bundle’ concept as indicators of the reliability of specific (evidence-based) care delivery tasks and improved outcomes. A care bundle consists of a number of time-specific interventions that should be delivered to every patient every time. We aimed to apply the care bundle concept to selected QOF data to measure the quality of evidence-based care provision. METHODS: Care bundles and components were selected from QOF indicators according to defined criteria. Five clinical conditions were suitable for care bundles: Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Stroke & Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Each bundle has 3-8 components. A retrospective audit was undertaken in a convenience sample of nine general medical practices in the West of Scotland. Collected data included delivery (or not) of individual bundle components to all patients included on specific disease registers. Practice level and overall compliance with bundles and components were calculated in SPSS and expressed as a percentage. RESULTS: Nine practices (64.3%) with a combined patient population of 56,948 were able to provide data in the format requested. Overall compliance with developed QOF-based care bundles (composite measures) was as follows: CHD 64.0%, range 35.0-71.9%; Stroke/TIA 74.1%, range 51.6-82.8%; CKD 69.0%, range 64.0-81.4%; and COPD 82.0%, range 47.9-95.8%; and DM 58.4%, range 50.3-65.2%. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study compliance with individual QOF-based care bundle components was high, but overall (‘all or nothing’) compliance was substantially lower. Care bundles may provide a more informed measure of care quality than existing methods. However, the acceptability, feasibility and potential impact on clinical outcomes are unknown. BioMed Central 2012-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3523087/ /pubmed/23043262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-351 Text en Copyright ©2012 de Wet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Wet, Carl
McKay, John
Bowie, Paul
Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
title Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
title_full Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
title_fullStr Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
title_short Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
title_sort combining qof data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23043262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-351
work_keys_str_mv AT dewetcarl combiningqofdatawiththecarebundleapproachmayprovideamoremeaningfulmeasureofqualityingeneralpractice
AT mckayjohn combiningqofdatawiththecarebundleapproachmayprovideamoremeaningfulmeasureofqualityingeneralpractice
AT bowiepaul combiningqofdatawiththecarebundleapproachmayprovideamoremeaningfulmeasureofqualityingeneralpractice