Cargando…

Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR) are the most frequent of all manifestations of drug sensitivity and manifest with varied and diverse morphology. AIMS: To study the prevalence and clinical spectrum of CADR among patients attending outpatient department (OPD) in a tertiary care hos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Abanti, Das, Nilay Kanti, Hazra, Avijit, Gharami, Ramesh Chandra, Chowdhury, Satyendra Nath, Datta, Pijush Kanti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248414
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.103304
_version_ 1782253218449850368
author Saha, Abanti
Das, Nilay Kanti
Hazra, Avijit
Gharami, Ramesh Chandra
Chowdhury, Satyendra Nath
Datta, Pijush Kanti
author_facet Saha, Abanti
Das, Nilay Kanti
Hazra, Avijit
Gharami, Ramesh Chandra
Chowdhury, Satyendra Nath
Datta, Pijush Kanti
author_sort Saha, Abanti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR) are the most frequent of all manifestations of drug sensitivity and manifest with varied and diverse morphology. AIMS: To study the prevalence and clinical spectrum of CADR among patients attending outpatient department (OPD) in a tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study was undertaken over a 1-year period in dermatology OPD of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India. Patients presenting with suspected drug-related cutaneous lesions were included if drug identity could be ascertained. Clinical profiling was done. Drug history was recorded in a format specified in Indian National Pharmacovigilance Programme and causality assessment carried out as per World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria. RESULTS: Commonest CADR in our study was morbilliform eruption (30.18%), followed by fixed drug eruption (24.52%), Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)-Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and overlap of two (24.50%), exfoliative dermatitis (7.54%), urticaria (5.6%), phototoxic drug reaction (3.8%), pityriasis rosea-like eruptions (1.89%), and severe mucositis (1.80%). Drugs implicated were sulfonamides (17%), fixed-dose combinations of fluoroquinolones with nitroimidazoles (11.30%), analgesics (11.30%), antiepileptics (11.30%), beta-lactam antibiotics (9.40%), fluoroquinolones alone (7.50%), allopurinol (7.50%), and azithromycin (5.70%). Reaction latency varied from 1 to 43 days. Causality assessment was certain and probable for 18.9% and 41.5% of the reactions, respectively, and reactions were serious in 33.96% (95% confidence interval 21.21-46.71%). CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in this study is similar in many ways to studies conducted earlier in India. Incidence of life-threatening reactions like SJS-TEN was higher compared with studies conducted abroad. Reaction time and lesion patterns are helpful in identifying an offending drug in the setting of multiple drug therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3523512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35235122012-12-17 Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India Saha, Abanti Das, Nilay Kanti Hazra, Avijit Gharami, Ramesh Chandra Chowdhury, Satyendra Nath Datta, Pijush Kanti Indian J Pharmacol Short Communication BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR) are the most frequent of all manifestations of drug sensitivity and manifest with varied and diverse morphology. AIMS: To study the prevalence and clinical spectrum of CADR among patients attending outpatient department (OPD) in a tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study was undertaken over a 1-year period in dermatology OPD of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India. Patients presenting with suspected drug-related cutaneous lesions were included if drug identity could be ascertained. Clinical profiling was done. Drug history was recorded in a format specified in Indian National Pharmacovigilance Programme and causality assessment carried out as per World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria. RESULTS: Commonest CADR in our study was morbilliform eruption (30.18%), followed by fixed drug eruption (24.52%), Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)-Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and overlap of two (24.50%), exfoliative dermatitis (7.54%), urticaria (5.6%), phototoxic drug reaction (3.8%), pityriasis rosea-like eruptions (1.89%), and severe mucositis (1.80%). Drugs implicated were sulfonamides (17%), fixed-dose combinations of fluoroquinolones with nitroimidazoles (11.30%), analgesics (11.30%), antiepileptics (11.30%), beta-lactam antibiotics (9.40%), fluoroquinolones alone (7.50%), allopurinol (7.50%), and azithromycin (5.70%). Reaction latency varied from 1 to 43 days. Causality assessment was certain and probable for 18.9% and 41.5% of the reactions, respectively, and reactions were serious in 33.96% (95% confidence interval 21.21-46.71%). CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in this study is similar in many ways to studies conducted earlier in India. Incidence of life-threatening reactions like SJS-TEN was higher compared with studies conducted abroad. Reaction time and lesion patterns are helpful in identifying an offending drug in the setting of multiple drug therapy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3523512/ /pubmed/23248414 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.103304 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Saha, Abanti
Das, Nilay Kanti
Hazra, Avijit
Gharami, Ramesh Chandra
Chowdhury, Satyendra Nath
Datta, Pijush Kanti
Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India
title Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India
title_full Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India
title_fullStr Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India
title_full_unstemmed Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India
title_short Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in Eastern India
title_sort cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in eastern india
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3523512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248414
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.103304
work_keys_str_mv AT sahaabanti cutaneousadversedrugreactionprofileinatertiarycareoutpatientsettingineasternindia
AT dasnilaykanti cutaneousadversedrugreactionprofileinatertiarycareoutpatientsettingineasternindia
AT hazraavijit cutaneousadversedrugreactionprofileinatertiarycareoutpatientsettingineasternindia
AT gharamirameshchandra cutaneousadversedrugreactionprofileinatertiarycareoutpatientsettingineasternindia
AT chowdhurysatyendranath cutaneousadversedrugreactionprofileinatertiarycareoutpatientsettingineasternindia
AT dattapijushkanti cutaneousadversedrugreactionprofileinatertiarycareoutpatientsettingineasternindia