Cargando…

Comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in tumor tissue and peripheral blood can predict the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the heterogeneity of the sample sources makes it diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Fei, Wu, Jingxun, Xue, Cong, Zhao, Yuanyuan, Jiang, Wei, Lin, Liping, Wu, Xuan, Lu, Yachao, Bai, Hua, Xu, Jiasen, Zhu, Guanshan, Zhang, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3525047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251095
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S37289
_version_ 1782253386195795968
author Xu, Fei
Wu, Jingxun
Xue, Cong
Zhao, Yuanyuan
Jiang, Wei
Lin, Liping
Wu, Xuan
Lu, Yachao
Bai, Hua
Xu, Jiasen
Zhu, Guanshan
Zhang, Li
author_facet Xu, Fei
Wu, Jingxun
Xue, Cong
Zhao, Yuanyuan
Jiang, Wei
Lin, Liping
Wu, Xuan
Lu, Yachao
Bai, Hua
Xu, Jiasen
Zhu, Guanshan
Zhang, Li
author_sort Xu, Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in tumor tissue and peripheral blood can predict the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the heterogeneity of the sample sources makes it difficult to evaluate the detecting methodologies. The goal of this study is to compare different methods for analyzing EGFR mutation in blood and tumor tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one advanced NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib were included in the study. The EGFR mutation status of each patients’ blood was analyzed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), mutant-enriched liquidchip (ME-Liquidchip), and Scorpion Amplification Refractory Mutation System (Scorpion-ARMS) kits. EGFR mutation information in paired tumor samples detected by Scorpion-ARMS served as a reference. Comparative analyses were performed on mutation status results obtained from different methods and on the association between the clinical outcome of TKI treatment and EGFR mutation status. RESULTS: The response rate (RR) in the whole group was 33.3%. EGFR mutation rates were identified as 15.7%, 27.5%, and 29.4% by DHPLC, ME-Liquidchip, and Scorpion-ARMS in blood, respectively. In 34 cases that had paired tumor samples, the mutation rate in tissue was 41.2%. The RRs of patients with mutation detected by different methods were 71.4% (tumor), 62.5% (blood, DHPLC), 50.0% (blood, ME-Liquidchip), and 66.7% (blood, Scorpion-ARMS). EGFR mutation detected by Scorpion-ARMS in blood and tumor tissues had better prediction of RR to EGFR-TKI (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001) than mutation detected with DHPLC and ME-Liquidchip. CONCLUSION: Tumor tissue sample is the best source for EGFR mutation analysis in NSCLC patients. Peripheral blood samples may be used as an alternative source only in special conditions. Scorpion-ARMS, DHPLC, or ME-Liquidchip methods are all optional for detecting tumor EGFR mutation from blood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3525047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35250472012-12-18 Comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib Xu, Fei Wu, Jingxun Xue, Cong Zhao, Yuanyuan Jiang, Wei Lin, Liping Wu, Xuan Lu, Yachao Bai, Hua Xu, Jiasen Zhu, Guanshan Zhang, Li Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in tumor tissue and peripheral blood can predict the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the heterogeneity of the sample sources makes it difficult to evaluate the detecting methodologies. The goal of this study is to compare different methods for analyzing EGFR mutation in blood and tumor tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one advanced NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib were included in the study. The EGFR mutation status of each patients’ blood was analyzed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), mutant-enriched liquidchip (ME-Liquidchip), and Scorpion Amplification Refractory Mutation System (Scorpion-ARMS) kits. EGFR mutation information in paired tumor samples detected by Scorpion-ARMS served as a reference. Comparative analyses were performed on mutation status results obtained from different methods and on the association between the clinical outcome of TKI treatment and EGFR mutation status. RESULTS: The response rate (RR) in the whole group was 33.3%. EGFR mutation rates were identified as 15.7%, 27.5%, and 29.4% by DHPLC, ME-Liquidchip, and Scorpion-ARMS in blood, respectively. In 34 cases that had paired tumor samples, the mutation rate in tissue was 41.2%. The RRs of patients with mutation detected by different methods were 71.4% (tumor), 62.5% (blood, DHPLC), 50.0% (blood, ME-Liquidchip), and 66.7% (blood, Scorpion-ARMS). EGFR mutation detected by Scorpion-ARMS in blood and tumor tissues had better prediction of RR to EGFR-TKI (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001) than mutation detected with DHPLC and ME-Liquidchip. CONCLUSION: Tumor tissue sample is the best source for EGFR mutation analysis in NSCLC patients. Peripheral blood samples may be used as an alternative source only in special conditions. Scorpion-ARMS, DHPLC, or ME-Liquidchip methods are all optional for detecting tumor EGFR mutation from blood. Dove Medical Press 2012-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3525047/ /pubmed/23251095 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S37289 Text en © 2012 Xu et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Xu, Fei
Wu, Jingxun
Xue, Cong
Zhao, Yuanyuan
Jiang, Wei
Lin, Liping
Wu, Xuan
Lu, Yachao
Bai, Hua
Xu, Jiasen
Zhu, Guanshan
Zhang, Li
Comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib
title Comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib
title_full Comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib
title_fullStr Comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib
title_short Comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib
title_sort comparison of different methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of non-small cell lung cancer as a predictor of response to gefitinib
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3525047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251095
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S37289
work_keys_str_mv AT xufei comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT wujingxun comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT xuecong comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT zhaoyuanyuan comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT jiangwei comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT linliping comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT wuxuan comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT luyachao comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT baihua comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT xujiasen comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT zhuguanshan comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib
AT zhangli comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsinperipheralbloodandtumortissueofnonsmallcelllungcancerasapredictorofresponsetogefitinib