Cargando…
Prognostic Impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT Findings in Clinical Stage III and IIB Breast Cancer
BACKGROUND: This study prospectively evaluated the yield of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)FDG-PET-CT) in patients with clinical stages II and III breast cancer and the impact of PET-CT results on prognosis. METHODS: In the course of 71 months, 254 consecuti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3525816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs451 |
_version_ | 1782253467944878080 |
---|---|
author | Groheux, David Hindié, Elif Delord, Marc Giacchetti, Sylvie Hamy, Anne-sophie de Bazelaire, Cédric de Roquancourt, Anne Vercellino, Laetitia Toubert, Marie-Elisabeth Merlet, Pascal Espié, Marc |
author_facet | Groheux, David Hindié, Elif Delord, Marc Giacchetti, Sylvie Hamy, Anne-sophie de Bazelaire, Cédric de Roquancourt, Anne Vercellino, Laetitia Toubert, Marie-Elisabeth Merlet, Pascal Espié, Marc |
author_sort | Groheux, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study prospectively evaluated the yield of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)FDG-PET-CT) in patients with clinical stages II and III breast cancer and the impact of PET-CT results on prognosis. METHODS: In the course of 71 months, 254 consecutive patients with clinical stages II and III breast cancer (based on clinical examination, mammography, breast magnetic resonance imaging, and locoregional ultrasonography) underwent (18)FDG-PET-CT. The yield was assessed in the whole population and for each American Joint Committee on Cancer subgroup. The prognostic impact of PET-CT findings was analyzed. Tests of statistical significance were two-sided. RESULTS: (18)FDG-PET-CT changed the clinical stage in 77 of 254 patients (30.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.0% to 36.2%). It showed unsuspected N3 disease (infraclavicular, supraclavicular, or internal mammary nodes) in 40 patients and distant metastases in 53. PET-CT revealed distant metastases in 2.3% (1 of 44) of clinical stage IIA, 10.7% (6 of 56) of stage IIB, 17.5% (11 of 63) of stage IIIA, 36.5% (27 of 74) of stage IIIB, and 47.1% (8 of 17) of stage IIIC patients. Among 189 patients with clinical stage IIB or higher disease and adequate follow-up, disease-specific survival was statistically significantly shorter in the 47 patients scored M1 on (18)FDG-PET-CT in comparison with those scored M0, with a three-year disease-specific survival of 57% vs 88% (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, only distant disease on PET-CT and triple-negative phenotype were statistically significant prognostic factors. The relative risk of death was 26.60 (95% CI = 6.60 to 102.62) for M1 vs M0 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The yield of (18)FDG-PET-CT appeared substantial in patients with clinical stage IIB or higher breast cancer. In these patients, (18)FDG-PET-CT provided powerful prognostic stratification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3525816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35258162012-12-19 Prognostic Impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT Findings in Clinical Stage III and IIB Breast Cancer Groheux, David Hindié, Elif Delord, Marc Giacchetti, Sylvie Hamy, Anne-sophie de Bazelaire, Cédric de Roquancourt, Anne Vercellino, Laetitia Toubert, Marie-Elisabeth Merlet, Pascal Espié, Marc J Natl Cancer Inst Article BACKGROUND: This study prospectively evaluated the yield of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)FDG-PET-CT) in patients with clinical stages II and III breast cancer and the impact of PET-CT results on prognosis. METHODS: In the course of 71 months, 254 consecutive patients with clinical stages II and III breast cancer (based on clinical examination, mammography, breast magnetic resonance imaging, and locoregional ultrasonography) underwent (18)FDG-PET-CT. The yield was assessed in the whole population and for each American Joint Committee on Cancer subgroup. The prognostic impact of PET-CT findings was analyzed. Tests of statistical significance were two-sided. RESULTS: (18)FDG-PET-CT changed the clinical stage in 77 of 254 patients (30.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.0% to 36.2%). It showed unsuspected N3 disease (infraclavicular, supraclavicular, or internal mammary nodes) in 40 patients and distant metastases in 53. PET-CT revealed distant metastases in 2.3% (1 of 44) of clinical stage IIA, 10.7% (6 of 56) of stage IIB, 17.5% (11 of 63) of stage IIIA, 36.5% (27 of 74) of stage IIIB, and 47.1% (8 of 17) of stage IIIC patients. Among 189 patients with clinical stage IIB or higher disease and adequate follow-up, disease-specific survival was statistically significantly shorter in the 47 patients scored M1 on (18)FDG-PET-CT in comparison with those scored M0, with a three-year disease-specific survival of 57% vs 88% (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, only distant disease on PET-CT and triple-negative phenotype were statistically significant prognostic factors. The relative risk of death was 26.60 (95% CI = 6.60 to 102.62) for M1 vs M0 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The yield of (18)FDG-PET-CT appeared substantial in patients with clinical stage IIB or higher breast cancer. In these patients, (18)FDG-PET-CT provided powerful prognostic stratification. Oxford University Press 2012-12-19 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3525816/ /pubmed/23243198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs451 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Groheux, David Hindié, Elif Delord, Marc Giacchetti, Sylvie Hamy, Anne-sophie de Bazelaire, Cédric de Roquancourt, Anne Vercellino, Laetitia Toubert, Marie-Elisabeth Merlet, Pascal Espié, Marc Prognostic Impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT Findings in Clinical Stage III and IIB Breast Cancer |
title | Prognostic Impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT Findings in Clinical Stage III and IIB Breast Cancer |
title_full | Prognostic Impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT Findings in Clinical Stage III and IIB Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT Findings in Clinical Stage III and IIB Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT Findings in Clinical Stage III and IIB Breast Cancer |
title_short | Prognostic Impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT Findings in Clinical Stage III and IIB Breast Cancer |
title_sort | prognostic impact of (18)fdg-pet-ct findings in clinical stage iii and iib breast cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3525816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groheuxdavid prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT hindieelif prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT delordmarc prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT giacchettisylvie prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT hamyannesophie prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT debazelairecedric prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT deroquancourtanne prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT vercellinolaetitia prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT toubertmarieelisabeth prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT merletpascal prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer AT espiemarc prognosticimpactof18fdgpetctfindingsinclinicalstageiiiandiibbreastcancer |